The trend of contaminated bunkers has now placed proper taken bunker samples in a position arguably more important than before, says the Managing Director, AMEA, of international fuel testing and inspection company Veritas Petroleum Services (VPS).
“Contractual terms and multimillion dollar damages aside, it essentially boils down to the bunker sample and its analysis in these contaminated bunker cases,” Rahul Choudhuri told Manifold Times.
“Singapore, with SS 600 (Singapore Standard Code of Practice for Bunkering), already has the strictest regulations in place and VPS data shows that 23% of vessels bunkering in Singapore still do not follow this bunkering standard in terms of sampling control & documentation; taking this into account it is unclear what the non-compliance rate is at other ports but it is bound to many times more.”
The most common occurrence of improper sampling control is when Chief Engineers send in bunker samples to a fuel testing laboratory, such as VPS, for analysis with the seal sample number different from records in the bunker delivery note (BDN).
“If any issue arises from the ship-owners side, the supplier may say the concerned bunker sample is not stated on the BDN and therefore does not accept responsibility,” he explains.
“Chances of losing the claim in a dispute case are very high when this happens; as long as the seal number is not shown the ship-owner cannot go for any claims.”
Other sampling control issues can also come from an unclear agreement between the ship-owner and supplier without help from port authorities, or from bunker samples taken from multiple locations – both which can be solved by having a bunker surveyor who is able to clarify and control matters relating to sampling requirements.
“We are expecting more contaminated bunker fuel cases to emerge due to IMO 2020,” forecasts Choudhuri.
“So, proper bunker sampling and documentation for the purpose of blended fuel analysis and dispute resolution will be the coming key value add for marine fuel surveyors irrespective of the implementation of the MFM.
“Compared to the potential amount of damages caused by contaminated fuels, it will be prudent for a ship-owner to engage a bunker surveyor to acquire prefect bunker samples as an insurance policy.”
Photo credit: Veritas Petroleum Services
Published: 1 March, 2019
The newly launched Code of Best Practices – Commodity Financing guidelines will be the new ‘reference point’ taken by banks when considering to give trade finance to trading houses, believes Ian Teo.
Captain Daknash Ganasen, Senior Director (Operations & Marine Services), MPA, provides direction on what should players do when providing bunker fuel to a COVID-19 infected ship, and more.
Garren Hay will be responsible for sales of the PANOLIN range of Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants for the Singapore sole distributor agent Gealubes Consulting & Trading Pte Ltd.
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.