Panelists at the International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA) ‘Bunkering & Shipping in Transition’ conference discussed the mysteriously low uptake of the ISO 8217:2017 marine fuel quality standard with Unni Einemo, IBIA Director and IMO Representative, on Monday (12 April).
Chris Turner, Manager, Bunker Quality and Claims at Integr8 Fuels highlighted the importance of looking back at fundamentals; namely the contractual paperwork and the charterparty when considering the issue.
He cites in many instances the charterparty could have simply specified the latest ISO 8217 edition available.Meaning ultimately, more stringent requests for ISO 8217:2017 will result in its higher uptake in the market.
Douglas Raitt, Global FOBAS Manager, Lloyd’s Register described the situation to be “a complete mystery” as it is in the bunker suppliers’ interests to offer ISO 8217:2017.
This is due to the presence of a clause in ISO 8217:2017 that recognises the complexity of the bunkering supply chain, thus allowing for trace amounts of non-hydrocarbon products in the fuel – something that does not exist in earlier ISO standards of bunker fuels.
However, Raitt also pointed it is also this clause which deters shipowners from favouring the 2017 edition – rendering the situation to be a bit of a Catch-22.
“All I do know is currently only about 15% of the market is on the 2017 edition, which is frighteningly low in my view because the standard has been in play for four years now,” he states.
Charlotte Røjgaard, Global Head of Marine Fuel Services, Bureau Veritas Verifuel shared: “I do know there has been some scaremongering around the newest spec that it is not good enough and it doesn’t offer enough protection.”
“That could also be an explanation why some would not go for it. But yes, it’s a bit of a mystery.”
Overall, all panelists expressed their agreement with Turner’s statement that it all stems down to the clauses used within charterparty and contractual documents. They believed the uptake of the ISO 8217:2017 marine fuel quality standard could increase if contract clauses specified for the latest marine fuel quality standard.
Published: 26 April, 2021
Estimated total value of MFO which was erroneously recorded as having been delivered to the receiving vessels across the 14 proceeded CMA charges is US$121,585.60, states court document.
On 5th June 2021, VPS carried out a Remaining On Board (R.O.B.) survey on board a Singapore-registered bunker tanker at short notice by the Charterer and quickly identified the theft of 98 metric tons of bunker fuel.
No quarantine required if vessels have not called at Brazil, India, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines and South Africa during the 21 days prior to arrival at Hong Kong port, according to Marine Department notice.
CCIC discuss the progression of MFM technology for bunkering at Singapore port with Manifold Times; and possible development of a primary facility for MFM calibration.
‘The acquisition of PGI Industries will enhance VPS’ preventative maintenance services offered to the power sector, increasing protection and sustainability of the asset,’ says Malcolm Cooper, CEO, VPS.
A foreign vessel was involved in an alleged unauthorised STS incident with bunker tanker Pearl Melody on 5 June, Director and General Manager of Consort Bunkers tells Manifold Times.