“We will do everything in our power to recover these damages. Society here cannot be left to pay for this,” said Port Authority COO Ronald Paul.
The port is further planning to replace a section of the slopes stretching over more than 9 kilometres that have been contaminated by the Bow Jubail oil spill.
“With respect to the slopes, the slope elements are often soiled not only along the top, but also on the sides and bottom of the stone,” it says.
“In addition, the filter layer (rubble layer on which the stone is placed) is also contaminated.
“Cleaning the slope is done by means of a combination of high-pressure spraying and flushing with hot (90°) water. This method turned out to be extremely effective in previous clean-up operations.
“The reasons that this method will not achieve the envisaged solution under these circumstances are the oil type – heavy fuel oil – and the fact that the oil was spilled more than a month ago, with the result that much of the volatile components have evaporated.
“Along certain sections of the slopes, replacing the slopes is cheaper than cleaning.”
The entire clean-up operation is estimated to last until the middle of next year.
The port of Rotterdam has almost 75 kilometres of quay wall and more than 200 kilometres of slopes.
The Port of Rotterdam Authority in July submitted a lawsuit against National Chemical Carriers at the U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Louisiana due to the bunker spill.
Related: Rotterdam Port Authority sues NCC over bunker spill
Related: UPDATE 3: Rotterdam bunker spill incident
Related: UPDATE 2: Rotterdam bunker spill incident
Related: UPDATE: Rotterdam bunker spill
Related: Odfjell apologies for Rotterdam bunker spill incident
Related: Bunker spill at Rotterdam, shipowner held responsible
Photo credit: Port of Rotterdam Authority
Published: 13 August 2018
Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.
Cost of alternative bunker fuels, bunker operations and technology advancement are some considerations to be examined by the maritime industry, says Neo, director of SDE International Pte Ltd.
Kim Hyung Joon and Han Donghoon were planning to join the Singapore entities of Hartree Group - either Hartree Partners Singapore Pte Ltd or Hartree Marine Fuels - in October, discovered management.
‘When you think of Helmsman on the next occasion, think of us as lawyers with expertise in various fields. Come to us before a problem develops. It’s the process that matters,’ says Tang Chong Jun, Executive Director.
Bernard Chew was a former shareholder of MB Marine and was an authorised signatory of the company’s cheques at the material time, according to court documents obtained by Manifold Times.
Maersk, CMA CGM, BP and Stena Bulk give insights on availability of the three potential bunker fuel types, their plans, transition from fuel oil and LNG to alt fuels, how important sustainable marine fuels are to shipowners and more.