Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Fuel Availability Outlook (22 July 2026)

Availability tight across all grades in Singapore; bad weather keeps bunkering halted in Zhoushan’s outer anchorages; availability good across several Sri Lankan ports.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • Availability tight across all grades in Singapore
  • Bad weather keeps bunkering halted in Zhoushan’s outer anchorages
  • Availability good across several Sri Lankan ports

Singapore and Malaysia

VLSFO availability in Singapore remains tight, with recommended lead times at 14-19 days, largely unchanged from last week. Tightness persists because Singapore’s fuel oil inventories have yet to recover to pre-conflict levels, while cargo arrivals remain constrained due to renewed US-Iran hostilities disrupting traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

According to the latest Enterprise Singapore data, fuel oil stocks dropped below 18 million bbls in June from more than 23 million bbls in March. Inventories have also remained below 20 million bbls so far this month.

The lower inventory levels have tightened VLSFO supply, lending support to the benchmark price.

HSFO availability also remains tight, with recommended lead times of 9-13 days, compared with 10-12 days a week ago. LSMGO supply has tightened further, with lead times widening to 9-11 days from 6-9 days last week.

In Malaysia’s Port Klang, bunker fuel availability remains tight. VLSFO supply is constrained for prompt stems, while LSMGO availability also remains limited. HSFO continues to face supply pressure.

East Asia

Despite softer demand, VLSFO availability in Zhoushan has tightened, with recommended lead times extending to around 12 days, up from about eight days previously. A source attributed the longer waiting times to limited refinery supply.

Lead times for both LSMGO and HSFO have also lengthened to around seven days, compared with about five days last week.

Meanwhile, bunkering operations at Zhoushan’s outer Tiaozhoumen and Xiazhimen anchorages have remained suspended since 7 July due to adverse weather. Most suppliers are still uncertain about when normal bunker operations across the port will fully resume, the source added.

Bunker fuel availability across northern China remains mixed. Suppliers in Dalian and Qingdao have ample stocks of VLSFO and LSMGO, although HSFO availability in Qingdao remains limited. In Tianjin, all major bunker grades continue to face supply constraints, while VLSFO and HSFO remain tight in Shanghai. LSMGO availability in Shanghai, however, is relatively stable.

Supply constraints also persist across several southern Chinese ports. Both VLSFO and LSMGO remain tight in Fuzhou. Xiamen has sufficient VLSFO availability but tighter LSMGO supply, while both grades remain constrained in Yangpu and Guangzhou.

Hong Kong’s bunker market remains steady, with recommended lead times for all major bunker grades holding at around seven days, broadly unchanged from recent weeks.

In Taiwan, state-owned bunker supplier CPC Corporation (CPC) has temporarily stopped accepting new LSMGO nominations for deliveries at Kaohsiung due to a tight barge schedule.

According to a source, LSMGO deliveries have been suspended since last Friday and will remain on hold until CPC clears its backlog of pending orders.

The disruption has also affected VLSFO supply in Kaohsiung, with recommended lead times increasing to 4-5 days from around three days last week.

Elsewhere in Taiwan, bunker availability remains stable. Recommended lead times for both VLSFO and LSMGO are around two days in Hualien, while Keelung and Taichung continue to record lead times of about three days, broadly unchanged from the previous week.

Bunker fuel availability has tightened across South Korea’s southern ports, including Busan, Ulsan, Masan, Onsan, Yeosu and Kwangyang. Recommended lead times for both VLSFO and LSMGO have increased to 9-16 days, from 4-12 days last week. HSFO has also tightened, with lead times extending to 9-16 days from 4-12 days a week earlier.

In South Korea’s western ports—including Incheon, Daesan, Dangjin, Pyeongtaek and Taean—recommended lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO remain at 9-16 days, largely unchanged from last week. HSFO availability has tightened, with lead times rising to 9-16 days from 4-12 days previously.

Weather-related disruptions are expected to affect bunker operations in Daesan on 21 and 23 July.

Supply remains constrained at major Japanese ports, including Tokyo, Chiba, Kawasaki, Kashima, Nagoya, Yokkaichi, Osaka, Kobe, Mizushima and Oita. VLSFO and LSMGO continue to be offered by only a limited number of suppliers, while HSFO is relatively more accessible, with recommended lead times of around 7-10 days.

In contrast, Indonesia’s bunker market remains comfortably supplied. VLSFO availability is stable across Jakarta, Surabaya, Balikpapan and Cigading, where suppliers are generally recommending lead times of around 2-3 days.

Oceania

VLSFO availability remains stable in Western Australia, with suppliers in Kwinana and Fremantle generally recommending lead times of around seven days. Bunkering at both ports is handled by a single supplier, with all deliveries carried out by barge.

Supply conditions are more mixed along Australia’s east coast. In Port Kembla, VLSFO can be supplied via truck or pipeline, while suppliers in Sydney maintain adequate stocks of both VLSFO and LSMGO. HSFO remains comparatively tighter in Sydney, where suppliers typically require around seven days of advance notice.

In Queensland, VLSFO and LSMGO availability remains good in Brisbane and Gladstone, with recommended lead times also holding at around seven days.

Further south, suppliers continue to maintain healthy VLSFO inventories in Melbourne and Geelong. However, bunker deliveries at both ports depend on a single barge, keeping lead times at about one week. HSFO supply has tightened further in both Melbourne and Brisbane.

Meanwhile, one supplier is offering all major bunker grades in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne with lead times of around five days. In Dampier, bunker deliveries continue to be conducted through truck-assisted pipeline operations, making advance planning and berth confirmation particularly important, according to a market source.

Across the Tasman Sea, bunker fuel availability remains broadly unchanged in New Zealand. VLSFO is readily available in Tauranga and Auckland, where suppliers recommend lead times of around four days. At Marsden Point, both VLSFO and LSMGO can be supplied directly to vessels through pipeline infrastructure.

Weather continues to present operational risks across New Zealand. Bunker deliveries remain particularly susceptible to disruption in Wellington and ports across the South Island, where adverse weather can periodically interrupt supply operations.

South Asia

Recommended lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO at India’s west coast ports of Kandla, Sikka, Pipavav, Dahej and Hazira remain at 3–4 days, according to a source.

The monsoon is expected to disrupt bunker operations at several Indian ports over the coming days, with weather-related delays likely to affect delivery schedules. Bunkering is forecast to face disruptions at Kandla and Sikka between 20–24 July, while rough sea conditions could hamper operations in Mumbai, Cochin and Visakhapatnam during the same period.

In Sri Lanka, bunker market conditions remain stable, with adequate stocks of all major bunker fuel grades in Colombo and Hambantota. One supplier is recommending lead times of around seven days, almost unchanged from last week.

Adverse weather could also intermittently disrupt bunker operations in Colombo between 20–24 July and in Trincomalee between 20–23 July, potentially delaying bunker deliveries.

Middle East

Despite escalating US-Iran hostilities in the Strait of Hormuz, bunker fuel availability has improved in Fujairah. VLSFO and LSMGO supply has eased, with several suppliers now able to accommodate prompt delivery requests. HSFO availability, however, has tightened and is largely being offered only on a firm enquiry basis.

Similar supply conditions are being reported at the neighbouring UAE bunker hub of Khor Fakkan.

In Jeddah, VLSFO and LSMGO availability remains relatively stable.

In Qatar’s Ras Laffan, VLSFO and LSMGO supply continues to be constrained.

At Port Suez in Egypt, HSFO inventories remain tight, while VLSFO stocks are close to depletion.

Further south, the availability of all major bunker fuel grades remains limited in Djibouti.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

Admin

Published

on

By

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Taiwanese shipping firm Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation (Yang Ming) and South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean on Wednesday (2 September) signed a shipbuilding contract for six 13,000 TEU class LNG dual-fuel container vessels. 

The contract was signed by Dr. Chuck Tsai, Chairman of Yang Ming, and Mr. Charles Kim, CEO of Hanwha Ocean. The vessels are scheduled for delivery between 2028 and 2029. 

They will complement Yang Ming’s existing fleet of 10,000+ TEU vessels and serve as key vessels on East-West services, with deployment flexibility across trade lanes connecting Asia with the East and West Coasts of North America, South America, and the Mediterranean. 

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

“As Yang Ming transitions toward net-zero emissions, LNG provides a relatively mature and economically viable alternative fuel solution, capable of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 20%,” the company said. 

“At the same time, ammonia can serve as a carbon-free fuel by utilising converted LNG storage facilities, while offering relatively lower conversion costs and comparatively well-developed supply chains and infrastructure. The Ammonia Fuel Ready design will therefore provide Yang Ming with greater flexibility in responding to increasingly stringent international regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.”

In addition, the vessels will be equipped with Type B LNG fuel tanks with a design pressure of 1.0 bar to enhance the safety and efficiency of LNG operations, together with a range of energy-saving technologies, including Wind Shields, Rudder Bulbs, Pre-Swirl Stators, and Shore Power Systems. Smart ship technologies and cybersecurity protection features will also be incorporated to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and reliability while effectively reducing fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Deliveries under Yang Ming’s next-generation fleet optimization plan commenced earlier this year. By 2030, a total of 24 new vessels are expected to enter service. 

This includes 18 LNG dual-fuel vessels—comprising five 15,500 TEU, seven 16,000 TEU, and the six 13,000 TEU vessels under this contract—alongside six 8,000 TEU methanol dual-fuel-ready ships. 

 

Photo credit: Yang Ming Marine Transport
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Both secured AiP for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Admin

Published

on

By

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Lloyd’s Register (LR) and the Marine Design and Research Institute of China (MARIC) on Thursday (3 September) have secured Approval in Principle (AiP) for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Announced at SMM 2026, the concept addresses one of the biggest investment challenges facing shipping today: the need to develop vessels and capabilities that can support a range of alternative fuel options and pathways as technologies, infrastructure and regulations evolve.

While LNG is already a mature fuel pathway, methanol and ammonia remain at an earlier stage of development, with questions around global fuel availability, infrastructure development, economics and long-term adoption.

The 114,000 DWT tanker concept has been designed as a product and crude oil carrier that can accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia as technologies, regulations and fuel supply chains mature. By incorporating conversion readiness at the design stage, the concept aims to reduce future retrofit complexity and provide owners with greater confidence when planning long-term fleet investments.

The design concept was reviewed against LR’s July 2026 class rules and regulations, including requirements relating to ships using gases and other low-flashpoint fuels, alongside relevant IACS Common Structural Rules for oil tankers. Final classification and statutory approval remain subject to full compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.

Theo Kourmpelis, Global Business Director for Tankers, Lloyd’s Register, said: “Shipowners are being asked to make major investment decisions today despite continued uncertainty around which fuels will dominate in the decades ahead. Alternative fuel solutions each offer potential pathways to compliance, but fuel infrastructure, regulation and economics continue to evolve at different speeds around the world.

“Designs that preserve flexibility will be critical in helping owners manage risk while preparing for multiple future scenarios.”

Si Nan, Marine & Offshore Marketing Department Vice Director, MARIC, said: “As the industry explores different decarbonisation pathways, shipowners need vessel designs that can adapt alongside technological and regulatory developments. This concept was developed specifically to provide greater fuel flexibility and long-term resilience, allowing owners to respond to changing market requirements without being locked into a single fuel strategy.

“Receiving Approval in Principle from Lloyd’s Register is an important milestone that validates the design concept and supports its future development.”

 

Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity while the strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform alternative-fuelled vessel ordering was strong in August, with 52 new vessels added to the platform.

This is the highest monthly total since October 2024 and follows another active month in July, when 47 vessels were added to the database.

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity, with 46 orders recorded. The container segment led the way with 30 orders, while the car carrier segment contributed a further 12 LNG-fuelled vessels. In addition, four ethanol-fuelled bulk carriers and two hydrogen-powered bulk carriers were added during the month, as well as one LNG bunker vessel.

The strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year. In total, 242 alternative-fuelled vessel orders have been placed in the first eight months of 2026, representing a 27% increase compared with the same period in 2025.

LNG remains the dominant fuel choice, accounting for 63% of all alternative-fuelled vessel orders registered so far this year. Container vessels represent the largest share of these LNG orders (59%), followed by car carriers (30%).

Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “The past two months have been particularly strong for alternative-fuelled vessel ordering, with August recording the highest monthly total we’ve seen since October 2024. This has helped lift year-to-date orders to a level well above the same period last year.

“LNG remains the leading fuel choice, driven largely by activity in the container and car carrier segments. These sectors have been among the earliest adopters of alternative fuels, supported by predictable liner operations and increasing demand from cargo owners to reduce emissions across supply chains. 

“For many owners, LNG offers a combination of emissions reductions, fuel availability and future flexibility while the longer-term fuel landscape continues to evolve. 

“At the same time, the latest figures include orders for ethanol- and hydrogen-fuelled vessels, highlighting that owners continue to explore a range of decarbonization pathways. Different segments are making different fuel choices, but the overall level of activity demonstrates continued investment in lower-emission shipping.”

Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.26 PM Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.36 PM

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS



Trending