Goodwood Associates, a Singapore-based wholesaler of petrochemical products, has just commenced legal action to wind up marine fuel supplier Southernpec (Singapore) Pte Ltd (SSPL) and its sister firm Southernpec (Singapore) Shipping Pte Ltd (SPSPL), after the Court of Appeal upheld a judgement quashing claims by both entities that a pair of oil trades carried out on their watch in 2015 were sham transactions.
Wong Joo Wan of Alternative Advisors Pte Ltd is the appointed liquidator. The High Court of Singapore has set 25 June 2021 as the hearing date for the winding-up application.
SSPL, which had its operating licences revoked in 2019 after the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore found it guilty of malpractices, had placed two orders in July 2015 for about 3,200 metric tons of fuel oil.
SPSPL, which is involved in vessel chartering and oil storage, acted as one of two guarantors for SSPL under the two agreements. The other guarantor was Southernpec Corporation, the Guangzhou-incorporated parent company of SSPL.
Both orders were fulfilled by Goodwood, which played the role of an intermediary credit sleever by buying the fuel oil from BMS United Bunkers (Asia) Pte Ltd (BMS), an oil trader, and selling it to SSPL.
After SSPL failed to make payment of US$1.49 million for the fuel oil, Goodwood found out there were other counterparties involved in the two trades, which in reality were part of an extensive web of transactions set up without Goodwood’s knowledge.
The fuel oil trades soured after two counterparties in the trading chain – Universal Alliance and Taigu (Singapore) Energy – defaulted on their respective payments, resulting in SSPL holding back on paying Goodwood.
Everyone in the chain went after their immediate trading counterparty for payment, except SSPL, which alleged that both trades were sham transactions and designed to artificially inflate the revenues of Goodwood and BMS.
Goodwood lodged a police report in October 2015 following SSPL’s allegations, paving the way for a set of lawsuits that lasted until this year.
On 5 November 2020, High Court Judge Hoo Sheau Peng ruled in favour of Goodwood and declared the July 2015 trades were not sham transactions. SSPL and SPSPL were ordered to pay Goodwood US$1.49 million for the two trades, as well as contractual interest and costs.
The two Southernpec entities sought to overturn the decision but their attempt was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 6 May 2021.
To date, both companies have yet to make full payments to Goodwood. Accordingly, Goodwood has commenced proceedings to wind them up.
Related: USD $1.49 million bunker credit sleeving dispute between Goodwood and Southernpec reaches conclusion
Photo credit: Benjamin Child
Published: 7 June, 2021
Advanced analytical services will support support clients in the shipping sector allowing for more accurate and efficient testing of methanol as a marine fuel, Bryan Quek tells bunkering publication Manifold Times.
While slow steaming may help save fuel cost and lowers emissions, it may end up being a costly endeavour for ship owners. Innospec suggests looking at smart slow steaming instead, shares Nicea Ng.
Bunker claim was regarding the supply and delivery of RMG380 to the demise charter of the India-flagged oil tanker on 24 February 2022 at Yosu port, according to court documents obtained by Manifold Times.
Claim was regarding sales of LSFO from Gulf Petrochem to Prime Oil Trading on 24 February 2020 which was due for payment on 23 June 2020 after a 120-day credit period, state court documents.
Remi Eriksen of DNV Group, shared during event, the business case for decarbonization must involve four key factors including alternative bunker fuels once safety guidelines and bunkering infrastructure are established.
Malaysian government will ensure all obligations and conditions under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships or MARPOL are implemented, says Transport Minister.