Oslo-listed ship bulk ship operator and management firm Belships ASA has entered into an agreement to hedge the price differential between compliant 0.5% sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) and 3.5% sulphur fuel oil (HSFO), it says.
The secured exposure is for 24,000 metric tonnes (mt) of bunkers for the full calendar year 2020. The volume equals the annual fuel consumption of about four vessels. The fixed price differential is USD 198 per ton, with monthly settlements in 2020.
“The company’s trading fleet will be physically ready by January 2020 to comply with the IMO Sulphur Cap 2020, which prohibits marine bunkering fuels containing more than 0.5% sulphur in order to improve the shipping industry’s environmental footprint,” it explains.
“The bunker price differential hedge reduces downside risks and represents an efficient alternative to costly installations of scrubbers, whilst retaining full utilisation of the fleet and the flexibility to adjust the position as the market develops.”
To date, the Belships fleet counts 19 Supramax/Ultramax bulk carriers, including one newbuilding from Imabari, Japan in the first half of 2020.
Published: 13 May, 2019
Sukumar Verma, Managing Director at Informa Connect Singapore, explains how the world’s largest bunkering event will be virtually carried out between 6 to 8 October 2020.
David John Kidd amassed losses of over SGD 1 million to Lukoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd through multiple irregular trades with Transocean Oil over a four-month period in 2016.
Helmsman LLC lawyers discuss pausing of LC payment, what it means for parties buying ships from companies of a group affected by fraud allegations, and trafficking in spent bills of lading.
Beluga Asia has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with Sun Marine Corporation to acquire bunker tanker M.T. MA Veronica for USD 2.45 million.
Listing of Brightoil’s shares on the Stock Exchange was cancelled on 16 March 2020, according to a written Judgement of Russell Coleman, a Judge of the Court of First Instance.
‘To this end, the Bank has shown there are grounds for suspecting the CIA Contract may be a sham / fake contract and/or was not performed,’ said CMB’s submission to the Singapore court.