Connect with us

Business

NewOcean delays release of FY 2021 results, ‘catastrophic credit freeze’ amongst reasons

Difficulties faced by the company include departure of staff, relocation of its headquarters to China, severely affected staff recruitment process due to Covid-19 restrictions.

Admin

Published

on

NewOcean

Hong Kong-listed NewOcean Energy Holdings Limited on Wednesday (29 June) said it was unable to publish the audited annual results of the Group for the year ended 31 December 2021. 

Manifold Times previously reported the Company receiving a letter from the Stock Exchange setting out the resumption guidance for the resumption of trading in the Company’s shares including announcing all material information for the Company’s shareholders and investors to appraise the Company‘s position.

Some of the issues the Group outlined in the delay included relocation of its headquarters to Mainland China and the departure of a considerable number of staff

UPDATE ON BUSINESS OPERATION AND PUBLICATION OF 2021 AUDITED ANNUAL RESULTS

Due to the catastrophic credit freeze by the banks in year 2020, the Group was under tight cashflow. From year 2021 onward, the Group has gradually downsized its operating size and focused on generating lease income through leasing out the Group’s terminal facilities in Zhuhai and other fixed assets. 

Following the relocation of the headquarters function of the Group’s regional offices in Mainland China and the departure of a considerable number of Hong Kong management and account staff who were unable to accept the relocation of their place of work, the Group experienced difficulties in preparing preliminary annual results announcement of the Group for the year ended 31 December 2021. 

Due to the Covid-19 pandemic in the first half year of 2022, there were serious entrance restrictions imposed by the government in Hong Kong, and other regions in Mainland China, Hong Kong staff are not easy moving over to work in the headquarter in Mainland China. Moreover, the staff recruitment process have been severely affected as well. As at the dated of this announcement due to the outbreak of the Covid-19, the Group is unable to function properly and effectively. As a result of the current situation of the Group, the unaudited consolidated management account of the Group for the year ended 31 December 2021 remains unavailable. 

Accordingly, the Company was unable to publish: 

(i)the audited annual results of the Group on or before the end of March 2022 as required under Rule 13.49(1) of the Listing Rules; and 

(ii) the unaudited management account as required under Rule 13.49(3) of the Listing Rules. 

Upon the relaxation of the prevention measures and travel restrictions caused by the pandemic, the Group will continue to recruit additional professionals to further strengthen the financial reporting team of the Group and target to announce its unaudited and audited financial results for the year ended 31 December 2021 as soon as practicable.

UPDATED ON BERMUDA WINDING UP PETITION AND HONG KONG WINDING UP PETITION

As disclosed in the Announcements, the Bermuda Winding Up Petition and Hong Kong Winding Up Petition have been adjourned to 8 July 2022 and 27 July 2022 respectively.

RESUMPTION GUIDANCE

The Company is working closely with its legal advisers and taking appropriate steps to fulfil the Resumption Guidance. The Company remains committed to using its best endeavours to fulfil the Resumption Guidance as soon as practicable and will update the shareholders and potential investors of the Company as and when appropriate should there be any material development on the Resumption Guidance.

CONTINUED SUSPENSION OF TRADING

Trading in the shares of the Company will continue to be suspended pending fulfilment of the Resumption Guidance.

Trading in the Company’s Shares may be suspended if any winding up order is made by the court with provisional liquidators appointed to the Company. Shareholders and potential investors should exercise caution when dealing in the Shares of the Company.

Manifold Times earlier reported NewOcean Energy Holdings Limited saying it experienced difficulties in preparing preliminary annual results of the Group for the year ended 31 December 2021.

Related: NewOcean delays release of FY 2021 results, postpones AGM to Sep 2022
Related: NewOcean: Winding up petition proceedings in court adjourned to 27 July
Related: Hong Kong Stock Exchange issues trading resumption guidance to NewOcean Energy
Related: NewOcean appoints law firm to oppose petition at 15 June hearing
Related: NewOcean warns of trading halt of company shares on HKSE from 1 April onwards
Related: NewOcean delays release of FY 2021 results, postpones AGM to Sep 2022
Related: NewOcean Energy auditor tender resignation over disagreement of FY 2021 audit fee
Related: NewOcean company secretary and authorised representative resigns on HQ relocation
Related: NewOcean Energy loses second Executive Director on HQ relocation to China
Related: NewOcean Energy HQ relocates to mainland China, Executive Director resigns
Related: NewOcean Energy officially begins ‘soft touch’ debt restructuring process
Related: NewOcean Energy reshuffles lineup of Independent Non-executive Directors
Related: NewOcean Energy defends against HSBC winding up petition, secures time for debt restructuring
Related: NewOcean: Winding up petition proceedings at Bermuda court to continue on 14 December
Related: NewOcean Energy Holdings forecasts 87% decrease net loss on year for 1H2021
Related: NewOcean posts USD 479 million FY 2020 loss; possible downsize of oil business
Related: NewOcean Energy delays release of 2020 financial results; to be published by end June
Related: NewOcean appoints Crowe as new auditors; replaces Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Related: NewOcean creditor scheme meeting dates at courts now ‘unrealistic’; delayed till further notice
Related: NewOcean auditors resign due to significant outstanding documents & information
Related: NewOcean revises creditor scheme meeting dates at Hong Kong, Bermuda Courts due to ‘substantial’ amendments
Related: NewOcean records USD 304.3 million loss, portion of SG bunkering business to remain
Related: NewOcean Energy issues USD 304.8 million net loss warning ahead of FY 2020 results
Related: NewOcean proposal to adjourn court scheme meeting approved by creditors
Related: NewOcean creditors meeting application granted by Supreme Court of Bermuda
Related: NewOcean planning creditors meeting, foundation of debt restructuring plan laid out
Related: NewOcean records USD 174 million 1H 2020 loss; Singapore bunkering business remains
Related: NewOcean Energy publishes profit warning to shareholders ahead of 1H 2020 results
Related: NewOcean Energy records 66% bunker sales jump to 4.5 million mt in FY 2019

 

Photo credit: NewOcean Energy Holdings Limited
Published: 30 June, 2022

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel

Singapore: Bunker fuel sales drops by 6.8% on year in May 2026

4.55 million mt of various marine fuel grades were delivered at the world’s largest bunkering port in May, down from 4.88 million mt recorded during the similar month in 2025, according to MPA data.

Admin

Published

on

By

Singapore: Bunker fuel sales drops by 6.8% on year in May 2026

Sales of marine fuel at Singapore port dropped by 6.8% on year in May 2026, according to data from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA).

In total, 4.55 million metric tonnes (mt) (exact 4,548,000 mt) of various marine fuel grades were delivered at the world’s largest bunkering port in May, down from 4.88 million mt (4,878,100 mt) recorded during the similar month in 2025.

Deliveries of marine fuel oil, low sulphur fuel oil, ultra low sulphur fuel oil, marine gas oil and marine diesel oil in May (against on year) recorded respectively 1.79 million mt (-5.3% from 1.89 million mt), 2.29 million mt (-6.5% from 2.45 million mt), zero (-100% from 1,200 mt), 600 (35.2% from 1,700 mt) and zero (from zero).

Singapore: Bunker fuel sales drops by 6.8% on year in May 2026

Bio-blended variants of marine fuel oil, low sulphur fuel oil, ultra low sulphur fuel oil, marine gas oil and marine diesel oil in May, (against on year) recorded respectively 11,600 mt (-71.6% from 40,900 mt), 36,400 mt (-62.1% from 96,100 mt), zero (from zero), zero (from zero) and zero (from zero). B100 biofuel bunkers, introduced in February last year, recorded 12,800 mt (+573.7% from 1,900 mt). 

LNG and methanol sales were 70,300 mt (+56.2% from 45,000 mt) and zero (from zero) respectively. There were no recorded sales of ammonia for the month and so far since 2025.

 

Photo credit: Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore
Published: 15 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel Quality

Bunker flash: High concentrations of catalytic fines, elevated acid numbers found in Singapore

Maritec-Naias issued an alert regarding high levels of catalytic fines and elevated acid numbers present in multiple VLSFO bunker samples from deliveries in the Singapore port.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Hans Reniers on Unsplash

Bunker fuel testing and marine surveying business Maritec-Naias on Friday (12 June) issued an alert regarding high levels of catalytic fines and elevated acid numbers present in multiple VLSFO bunker samples from deliveries in the Singapore port: 

During the period of 20 May 2026 and 02 June 2026, Maritec Pte. Ltd. (hereafter referred to as Maritec-Naias) conducted testing on five samples representing Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (VLSFO) deliveries from two suppliers in the Singapore port. The analyses revealed Aluminium and Silicon (Al+Si) concentrations ranging from 61 mg/kg to 68 mg/kg.

It is important to note; these values exceed the ISO 8217:2010/2017 specification limit of 60 ppm but remain within the permissible tolerance limit of 72 ppm under ISO 4259 for a single test result. In this regard, Catalytic Fines content, (Aluminium+Silicon), above 60 ppm is regarded as high. Of the five samples, three originated from one supplier, while the remaining two were from another.

Aluminium and Silicon constitute the principal classes of abrasive solids in fuels. Elevated concentrations of such particles at the engine inlet can precipitate abnormal wear and tear of fuel system components, piston rings, and cylinder liners. To safeguard against this, many engine manufacturers stipulate a maximum threshold of 15 mg/kg Al+Si at the engine inlet.

The primary method of mitigating Catfines is through an efficiently operating fuel purification system. Monitoring Aluminium and Silicon levels both before and after centrifugation provides a reliable measure of the system’s effectiveness in removing these contaminants.

During a similar period, Maritec-Naias also tested fifteen bunker fuel samples representing VLSFO that exhibited elevated Acid Numbers, ranging from 2.0 mg KOH/g to 2.5 mg KOH/g. While these values remain within specification limits, they are nonetheless considered at higher side. Elevated Acid Numbers may stem from contamination with acidic compounds such as Phenolic compounds and Alkyl Resorcinols, often associated with Estonian Shale Oil. Such contaminants can lead to operational complications including sludge formation, fuel pump seizures, and compromised injection equipment cleanliness.

Maritec-Naias Recommendations

  • High Catfines monitoring: Maritec-Naias advises collecting samples at critical points within the fuel system — including the fuel oil tank transfer pump, before and after centrifuge, service tank, and after fine-filter — to evaluate the efficiency of fuel cleaning.
  • Elevated Acid Numbers: For fuels with elevated Acid Numbers, Maritec-Naias recommends conducting Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) using the Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) method to identify the specific acidic compounds present or upgrading your marine fuel testing package to MFTP Plus, which enables pre-emptive monitoring to detect major harmful substances prevalent in the market, such as Cashew Nut Shell Liquid (CNSL), Phenolic compounds and Alkyl Resorcinols that cause damage to equipment.

Maritec-Naias states, while all data and findings presented in this document are true, it does not reflect on the overall quality of fuel being supplied in Singapore region. If you intend to bunker at this region, please request for a Certificate of Quality (CoQ) prior to loading.

 

Photo credit: Hans Reniers on Unsplash
Published: 15 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Incident

Three dead after supply boat sinks following collision off Pasir Panjang Terminal

PCG recovered three bodies from the waters after a supply boat sank off Pasir Panjang Terminal on 12 June 2026 at about 9.30am following a collision with a landing craft.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED bunker tanker singapore

The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) on Friday (12 June) said a supply boat sank off Pasir Panjang Terminal at about 9.30am after colliding with a landing craft. 

MPA, Police Coast Guard (PCG), and SCDF Marine Division, immediately activated their crafts to the incident site and commenced search and rescue operations.

“The landing craft is stable with no reported injury to crew on board,” MPA said in a statement. 

PCG has recovered three bodies from the waters, believed to be deceased crew members of the sunken supply boat. Search and rescue operations, including diving operations, are ongoing to determine if there are other crew members from the supply boat missing.

“Port operations have not been affected. Navigational broadcasts have been issued advising vessels to keep clear of the incident area,” it added.

“Investigations into the incident are ongoing.” 

 

Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 15 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending