Connect with us

ECA

MPA issues Guidelines for Preventing Pollution During Bunkering

Offenders liable to fine between $1,000 and $1 million, or imprisonment for term not exceeding two years, or both.

Admin

Published

on

5d12a91892f87 1561504024

The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) on Wednesday (25 June) issued a circular to all vessels that are supplying and receiving bunkers in the Port of Singapore.

The Guidelines for Preventing Pollution During Bunkering Operations circular highlights that bunkering related oil spills are generally due to operational lapses and could be prevented if all the necessary precautions are taken.

It also highlights the master, the owner and the agent of the ship shall each be guilty of an offence and shall each be liable on conviction to a fine of not less than $1,000 and not more than $1 million or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both, for any discharge of oil or oily mixture occurring from a Singapore ship into any part of the sea or from any ship into Singapore waters.

Guidelines to be observed by bunker tankers and receiving vessels during bunkering operations

  1. Both bunker tanker and receiving vessel are to be securely moored taking into consideration the prevailing and expected sea/weather conditions. Moorings are to be tended to promptly throughout the entire operation.
  2. The entire bunkering operation is to be supervised by a responsible person.
  3. An effective and reliable communication line is to be used and agreed between both bunker tanker and receiving vessel. (Alternatively if the main communication fails on either ship, the agreed emergency signal is to be sounded and all bunkering operations are to be suspended immediately).
  4. Prior to the commencement of bunkering operation, the maximum pumping rate and maximum pressure including starting and topping-up rate have to be agreed upon by both bunker tanker and receiving vessel.
  5. The emergency shut-down procedure is to be agreed upon by both vessels prior to the commencement of bunkering operation.
  6. The bunker hoses/arms are to be in good condition and properly rigged and securely connected.
  7. Before commencement of bunkering operation, all overboard discharge scuppers are to be effectively plugged and drip trays of adequate size are to be placed in position.
  8. The cargo and bunker connections when not in use are to be securely blanked off.
  9. The sea and overboard discharge valves when not in use are to be closed and lashed.
  10. During the entire bunkering operation, there should be sufficient personnel onboard in a state of readiness to deal with an emergency including the use of main engine for unmooring should the need arises.
  11. During the entire operation, no other operation involving (internal) transfer of bunker in bulk is to be carried out onboard either vessel.
  12. Fire-fighting, oil spill response equipment and dispersant are to be ready for immediate use.
  13. A person should be in constant attendance at both the delivery and receiving hose connection during the bunkering operation.
  14. A safe access between the bunker tanker and receiving vessel has to be provided.
  15. Day/night signal is to be exhibited clearly.
  16. In event of an oil spill, the Master, owner or agent shall inform the Marine Safety Control Centre immediately (Tel: 6325-2488 / 2489, VHF Ch 07) and comply with any instructions that may be given.
  17. For more detailed guidelines, refer to the Bunkering Pre-Delivery Safety Checklist as stated in Singapore Standard Code of Practice for Bunkering SS600 and Technical Reference for Bunker Mass Flow Metering TR48 published by Enterprise Singapore as amended from time to time.

Source: Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore
Published: 26 June, 2019

 

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel

FOBAS: Summary of marine fuel oil sulphur requirements

FOBAS publishes a bulletin to provide ship operators with an updated reminder of marine fuel oil sulphur regulations under various regulatory frameworks.

Admin

Published

on

By

Louis Reed from Unsplash

Lloyd’s Register Fuel Oil Bunkering Analysis and Advisory Service (FOBAS) on Wednesday (24 June) published a bulletin to provide ship operators with an updated reminder of marine fuel oil sulphur regulations under various regulatory frameworks: 

MARPOL Annex VI

Ships operating inside or outside Emission Control Areas (ECA) for Sulphur Oxides (SOx) i.e., ECA-SOx, are

required to comply with specific sulphur limits in respect of the fuel oils as used unless the particular

combustion systems (engine, boiler, other) in use have in operation an approved exhaust gas cleaning system as per MARPOL Annex VI regulation 4. These fuel oil limits are as follows;

  • Inside ECA-SOx: Max sulphur content of 0.10% m/m
  • Outside ECA-SOx: Max sulphur content of 0.50% m/m

MARPOL Annex VI regulation 14.3 currently gives the following as ECA-SOx together with the respective geographic limits:

  • Baltic Sea;
  • North Sea;
  • North American (which includes an area around the Hawaiian Islands);
  • US Caribbean Sea;
  • Mediterranean Sea;
  • Canadian Arctic; and
  • Norwegian Sea

Additionally, MEPC 84 adopted the North-East Atlantic as an ECA-SOx which will come into effect from 1 September 2028.

European initiatives

For EU, UK, and Turkish ports situated outside ECA-SOx, ships must switchover to a fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.10% m/m when at berth. Similarly, Norway and Iceland have also 0.10% m/m requirements for ships at berth and operating in Fjords (territorial / internal waters).

Other initiatives

Due to increasing concerns around the environmental impact from shipping on local air quality, there are a number of national and local regulations which require the use of low sulphur fuel oils, typically maximum sulphur content 0.10% m/m, or other measures by all or certain ships within defined areas. Examples of these are China, California (CARB), South Korea and Sydney. Furthermore, there can be other related restrictions, for example, on the discharges to sea from exhaust gas cleaning systems.

However, whereas with the MARPOL Annex VI ECA-SOx, there is a single point of reference as to which areas are covered, there is no such central registry for these regional, national or local initiatives taken outside MARPOL Annex VI. Consequently, in all the cases, it is important for ships to check with the relevant authorities beforehand in order to confirm the current status as regards SOx and related emission requirements in order to avoid any penalties – which can be substantial.

 

Photo credit: Louis Reed from Unsplash
Published: 25 June, 2026

Continue Reading

ECA

DNV: North-east Atlantic joins expanding network of ECAs

DNV highlighted key information on the new North-East Atlantic ECA, which will enter into force on 1 September 2027, following recent amendments MARPOL Annex VI adopted at MEPC 84.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED william william on Unsplash

Classification society DNV on Wednesday (17 June) highlighted key information on the new North-East Atlantic ECA, which will enter into force on 1 September 2027 following recent amendments MARPOL Annex VI adopted at MEPC 84, creating a continuous emissions control area across much of the North Atlantic: 

Need to Know

  • The new North-East Atlantic ECA will enter into force on 1 September 2027, creating a continuous emissions control area across much of the North Atlantic.
  • SOx limits (0.10% sulphur) will apply from 1 September 2028.
  • Ships meeting the MARPOL “three‑date” criteria (from 1 January 2027 onward) must comply with Tier III NOx limits for engines above 130 kW when operating in the ECA.

North-East Atlantic ECA

In general, the ECAs are designed to reduce air pollution from NOx, SOx and PM, and play a vital role in protecting sensitive marine environments as well as improving air quality for nearby communities.

The latest addition is the North-East Atlantic ECA, covering the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and territorial seas of Portugal, Spain, France, Ireland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Greenland and mainland UK that are not already included in existing ECAs. The EEZs surrounding Madeira, the Azores and the Canary Islands will be excluded. The precise ECA boundaries are defined by exact coordinates in Appendix VII of the revised MARPOL Annex VI.

Once in force, this designation will create a continuous ECA across the North-East Atlantic, linking the Canadian Arctic, Norwegian Sea, North Sea and Mediterranean Sea ECAs into a single, connected regulatory area.

eca map 2026 1

Application

The North-East Atlantic ECA, as part of the next amendments to Annex VI of MARPOL, will enter into force on 1 September 2027. The effective dates will be as follows:

SOx requirements

The sulphur limits for new North-East Atlantic ECA take effect 12 months after entry into force, in other words on 1 September 2028. From that date onwards, ships must use fuel with a sulphur content of no more than 0.10%.

Alternatively, compliance may be achieved using exhaust gas cleaning systems (EGCS) when operating on higher-sulphur fuels. However, it should be noted that restrictions on the use of open-loop EGCSs are becoming increasingly stringent, particularly in the coastal waters of northern Europe under OSPAR (please refer to our Technical and Regulatory News No. 26/2025), thereby limiting this as a practical compliance option in the region.

Note: The full article by DNV can be read here

 

Photo credit: william william on Unsplash and DNV
Published: 19 June, 2026

Continue Reading

ECA

VPS examines North-East Atlantic ECA on current bunker fuel mix and testing

Impact of this new ECA, will not only affect bunker fuel selection and testing, but it will also require a review of, voyage planning, bunker procurement and scrubber strategy, amongst others.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED VPS logo

Steve Bee, Group Marketing and Strategic Projects Director, and Emilian Buksak, Decarbonisation Advisor of marine fuels testing company VPS, on Wednesday (8 April) highlighted MEPC 84 approved a new emission control area (ECA) covering the North-East Atlantic Ocean, with agreements reached on adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI. 

The new ECA, which will become the world’s largest emission control area, will be implemented on 1st September 2027

In a recent article, VPS outlined how VPS testing, data, CEM systems and advisory services can support vessels in both their operational and compliance challenges associated with this new ECA:

The recent International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO), Maritime Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting in London, had its main focus on setting binding greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for the global shipping sector. In keeping with the Committee’s continuing drive to decarbonise shipping and reduce the pollutant emissions from the global fleet, one major outcome from the MEPC-84 meeting was the approval of a new emission control area (ECA) covering the North East Atlantic Ocean, with agreements reached on adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI.

This new ECA, which will become the world’s largest emission control area, will be implemented on 1st September 2027, with the ECA requirements taking effect on 1st September 2028. It will cover the territorial seas and exclusive economic zones of Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Ireland, the United Kingdom, France, Spain and Portugal, extending up to 200 nautical miles from their baselines:

VPS examines North-East Atlantic ECA impact on current bunker fuel mix and testing

A key advantage of the new NE Atlantic ECA is that it will close the gap between the existing ECAs in the North and Baltic Sea, plus the Mediterranean, creating an almost continuous zone of reduced shipping emissions. It will also connect to the newly approved ECAs in the Canadian Arctic and Norwegian Sea, which are scheduled for implementation in 2026 and 2027 respectively. Together these ECAs will cover almost half of all Arctic coastal waters, improving air quality, by reducing SOx, NOx and Particulate Matter (PM), protecting  public health, and reducing the environmental impacts from shipping.

The sulphur limit for the marine fuels allowed to be burnt within this new ECA will reduce from the current 0.50% to 0.10%. This will force vessels to use either effective abatement technology (scrubbers), or alternatively burn marine distillates, ultra-low-sulphur fuels (ULSFOs), or biofuels with a sulphur content of less than 0.10%.

Without doubt this new ECA will cause a significant change to the current fuel mix, probably on an even greater scale than was witnessed with the introduction of the Mediterranean ECA back in May 2025.  The fuel mix in the Mediterranean Pre-ECA implementation was,  53% VLSFO, 28% HSFO, 16% MGO, 2% ULSFO and 1% Biofuels. But from the 1st May 2025, the fuel mix changed to, 30% VLSFO, 29% HSFO, 30% MGO, 8% ULSFO and 4% Biofuels.  

So, in terms of actual tonnage, the Mediterranean ECA witnessed a decrease in VLSFOs by 23%, whilst MGO usage increased by 107%. At the same time, ULSFO and biofuels supply increased 4-fold.

Regarding fuel quality within the Mediterranean post-ECA implementation, MGO off-specification rates increased to 4%. However, the most worrying off-specification rates were for ULSFOs which saw a 10-times increase from 2% to 20% from the start of the ECA, with the main off-specification parameters being pour point, sulphur, TSP, CCAI, water and viscosity.

Therefore, it is fair to assume we’ll witness a similar dramatic fuel mix change upon the implementation of the NE Atlantic ECA, with possibly similar fuel off-specification issues, highlighting the continuing need for proactive fuel testing to protect vessels, crew and the environment.

Whilst the focus on fuel quality is essential, the multi-pollutant nature of this new ECA, covering SOx, PM and NOx, also brings the role of continuous emissions monitoring increasingly to the fore. Therefore, a further consideration relating to the impact of this new ECA relates to vessel newbuilds and the stricter NOx Tier III requirements. For newbuilds subject to the stricter NOx Tier III requirements, compliance depends not only on engine certification at delivery, but on demonstrating that exhaust after-treatment systems, typically Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) or Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR), continue to perform as designed throughout the service life of the vessel.

For scrubber-equipped ships, real-time SO₂ measurement provides the operational evidence of equivalency that Port State Control inspections increasingly expect to see. Plus, for vessels operating under multiple overlapping regulatory regimes, including the new NE Atlantic ECA, EU MRV, EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime, continuous emissions monitoring via the VPS EMSYS CEM system delivers a single, verified source of emissions data that can be applied across all of them.

As noted by DNV in their MEPC 84 technical and regulatory update, the newly adopted IMO measurement guidelines can also be used for determining actual methane and nitrous oxide under the EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime, confirming the direct route from IMO-recognised measurement to EU compliance reporting.

At an operational level, the new ECA will introduce considerable complexity in the way fuel consumption is attributed across voyage segments, with VLSFOs burnt outside the zone and compliant fuels inside, all of which carry implications for consumption reporting, charterparty allocation and EU MRV alignment. VPS Maress can provide the underlying fuel and energy data into one auditable platform, helping crews manage the operational complexity that the new ECA introduces, including voyage segmentation, fuel changeover and emissions accounting, plus providing the consolidated data foundation that feeds existing EU MRV and IMO DCS reporting obligations. 

VPS PortStats via the VPS Verisphere eco-system, (VeriSphere | VPS), further supports bunker procurement planning with port-by-port intelligence on compliant fuel availability and price spreads. Such intelligence and insights, will prove particularly valuable in the months immediately following 1st September 2028, when the supply pressure on 0.10% sulphur fuels is likely to peak.

Regarding the more strategic decisions ahead, including Tier III engine selection for newbuilds, retrofit feasibility for existing tonnage, and charterparty clauses allocating the ECA fuel cost premium between owners and charterers, VPS Advisory Services can provide the integrated commercial and technical perspective needed to navigate this transition with confidence.

Therefore, its clear the impact of this new ECA, will not only affect the choice of fuel to be burnt onboard and its subsequent quality testing, but it will also require a review of, voyage planning, bunker procurement, scrubber strategy, engine certification, compliance documentation and charterparty exposure.

Related: DNV on IMO MEPC 84: Revisiting Net‑Zero Framework

 

Photo credit: VPS
Published: 14 May, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending