BIMCO on Monday (20 May) informed the shipping industry about several developments on scrubbers reached at the 74th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 74) meeting which ended on Friday.
The meeting agreed on guidance for a malfunctioning scrubber and an investigation on scrubber washwater, notes Jeppe Skovbakke Juhl, Manager, Maritime Technology & Regulation at BIMCO.
“If the Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (EGCS) fails, and the ship is no longer in compliance with the sulphur-rules, the ship should change over to compliant fuel oil, if the EGCS cannot be put back into a compliant condition within one hour,” he notes.
“The failure should also be properly reported in the EGCS Record Book.
“The reason for a failure could be either a system error or a failure of a monitoring instrument, where the system malfunction cannot be rectified.
“If the ship does not have compliant fuel oil or sufficient amount of compliant fuel oil on board, the ship should communicate a proposed course of action to the relevant authorities (including the ship’s administration), in order to bunker compliant fuel oil or carry out repair works. The authorities need to sign off on this course of action.
“There are several different designs of marine exhaust gas cleaning systems that remove sulphur oxides from ship’s engine and boiler exhaust gases. The troubleshooting may therefore vary among the EGCS manufacturer.”
Meanwhile, Juhl informs MEPC has agreed to task its sub-committee on Pollution Prevention and Response (PPR) to look into the discharge from open-looped scrubbers, in particular the environmental impact of the washwater.
“During the meeting, several delegations expressed some fundamental concerns whether a scrubber system could constitute a more favourable treatment of ships equipped with a scrubber system (or Exhaust Gas Cleaning System), compared to ships using compliant fuel,” he updates.
“Today, the industry is faced with many new national or regional rules on the water discharges from scrubbers. These rules are increasingly restricting – or even prohibiting – ships from discharging scrubber washwater certain sea areas – such as ports, estuaries and coastal areas. Hence, as part of the work, PPR is tasked to evaluate and possibly harmonize the rules and guidance on the discharge of washwater from scrubbers.
“Preliminary results from scientific studies modelling the accumulative effect of scrubber discharge in port shows very limited effect when compared to the EU water quality standards.
“This is not an issue that will be decided soon, as finalization is expected in 2022.”
A series of earlier MEPC 74 coverage by Manifold Times, focusing on developments, have been organised below:
Related: IBIA: MEPC 74 completes IMO 2020 guidelines
Related: ICS: Shipping ‘on track’ to meet 2030 CO2 reduction target
Related: MEPC 74: ‘Little or no serious discussion’ on GHG reductions
Related: MEPC 74: Talks on carbon emissions at Arctic pushed to PPR 7
Related: MEPC 74: LR publishes summary report of meeting
Related: MEPC 74: ClassNK covers Air Pollution in preliminary report
Photo credit: International Maritime Organization
Published: 22 May, 2019
Issues faced by shipowners coming into 2020 have now been overshadowed by the pandemic but challenges remain on the full implementation of IMO 2020.
Company ‘uniquely positioned’ to take advantage of emerging opportunities 2020 brings, it says.
Reminds shipping industry that carriage ban is meant to support consistent implementation of the sulphur cap.
35,000 mt of bunker fuel was loaded from Sinochem Tianjin Port warehouse onto its Lipingtan tanker to be exported, said General Administration of Customs.
‘The important thing now is to ensure consistent implementation of the requirement,’ says Secretary-General.
For the purpose of facilitating smooth and consistent implementation of the global 2020 sulphur cap.
Caroline Yang, President of SSA, addresses issues earlier raised by players; including PMC No. 04, the seven-day restriction, contactless bunkering, sampling point, hose connection, and more.
IBIA Asia, ABIS, sources from Singapore’s bunkering and surveying companies, and an industry veteran share with Manifold Times the issues expected from MPA’s latest Covid-19 measures.
The top three positive movers in the 2020 bunker supplier list are Hong Lam Fuels Pte Ltd (+13); Chevron Singapore Pte Ltd (+12); and SK Energy International (+8), according to MPA list.
‘We will operate in the Singapore bunkering market from the Tokyo, with support from local staff at Sumitomo Corporation Singapore,’ source tells Manifold Times.
Changes include abolishing advance declaration of bunkers as dangerous cargo, reducing pilotage fees on vessels receiving bunkers, and a ‘whitelist’ system for bunker tankers.
Claim relates to deliveries of MGO to the vessels Pacific Diligence, Pacific Valkyrie, Pacific Defiance, Crest Alpha 1, and Pacific Warlock between March 2020 to April 2020.
