The International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners (Intercargo) has voiced concerns on the implementation of the 0.5% sulphur cap for marine fuel from 2020.
The organisation says it is promoting the consideration of transitional issues such as the availability and safety aspects of compliant fuels, and incidents of non-availability of low sulphur bunkers at certain ports.
It also encourages the effective implementation of the International Maritime Organization (IMO)’s 2020 sulphur cap regulation, yet with a pragmatic approach.
According to Intercargo, shipowners currently face technical and operational challenges in achieving compliance from 01 Jan 2020 due to the current marine fuel supply landscape and widespread uncertainty.
“The availability of compliant fuels and their safe consumption are especially of concern,” it explains.
“A drastic step-change is expected in 2020 and if a smooth transition is not ensured, the impact will be great. There will be an impact on trade, on economic growth and on the societies of both developed and developing countries worldwide.”
Dr Kostas G. Gkonis, Secretary General at Intercargo, says regulations are welcomed but these should be practically applied.
“It is said that the bulk ship is the workhorse of international trade. We should make sure we do not slay the horse though,” he notes.
“Regulation is welcome but should also be measured and wise. We see regulations being adopted whose implementation cannot be effective.
“Two examples are ballast water management, with experience building this year, and the bunkers’ sulphur cap, where important decisions are also to be taken this year.
“In both cases we have set a deadline without having yet the technologies in the first case or the fuel in the second case to meet the regulatory requirements.”
Photo credit: International Maritime Organization
Published: 8 March, 2018
MEPC 73 approved a draft circular containing IMO’s Guidance on best practice for fuel oil suppliers.
Shares information on “compatibility” and “cold flow properties” of IMO 2020 fuels as well as related risks.
The local bunkering sector has adapted to IMO 2020 requirements and LSFO is now available at more than two earlier locations, notes bunker supplier Trillion Energy.
Recent bans and negative sentiment expressed in the press has created uncertainty about scrubbers.
Bank of America report points out price changes ‘quickly dissipating’ as trade war between US and China escalates.
IMO must ‘not entertain any arguments calling for a delay or exemptions’ in implementation of Arctic HFO ban, says Dr Sian Prior.
‘The JMs have failed to discharge their duties by blindly helping the Banks mount a false case against the Defendant,’ wrote defence lawyers representing former IPP Director Dr Goh Jian Hian in court statement.
Lead prosecutor Andreas Myllerup Laursen aims for a fine and a prison sentence in the so-called Syria case scheduled to commence in Odense, Denmark on 26 October, writes the Danish publication.
In a modern re-telling of the story of David versus Goliath, local bunker barge owners/charterers successfully resisted claims brought in the Singapore courts by Phillips 66 for misdelivery of bunkers.
Bunker barge owners and operators; traders and suppliers; banks, including players in other countries, will have to re-examine respective operations, advises Helmsman Associate Director Jonathan Tan.
Vopak BL was a non-essential document with no contractual force and had no effect as a contract of carriage or as a document of title, states written Judgement issued by Singapore Court of Appeal.
Dwivedi Vivek Kumar ended his tenure as Global Head – Bitumen & Shipping & Regional Head – APAC at GP Global APAC on 10 November 2020 due to internal structuring of the GP Global Group.
