The lack of progress and low ambition shown at this week’s round of negotiations to reduce shipping’s contribution to the climate crisis is deeply concerning and disappointing, the Clean Shipping Coalition (CSC) has said.
Two years after agreeing its initial greenhouse gas strategy, a meeting of the UN maritime agency, the IMO, did little more than review options already on the table and gave far too much time to technical measures that will deliver too little too late, notes CSC.
There was however widespread acceptance by IMO member states and industry that ship speed is one of the most important factors affecting GHG emissions, and the CSC’s ship speed proposal is among those proposals for operational measures to be taken forward.
“The importance of speed reduction in cutting ship GHG emissions in the short-term is woven into the fabric of many of the proposed measures,” said John Maggs, senior policy advisor at Seas at Risk.
“The challenge as we go forward is to ensure that this most straight-forward of approaches is taken up and implemented in such a way that all ships contribute speed-related emissions savings.”
Japan and Norway’s proposed measure to certify ships that limit their engine power – though the limit can easily be reversed – is unambitious, opaque, and susceptible to cheating, notes CSC.
Crucially, it won’t achieve the urgent and deep cuts in emissions that are necessary if shipping is to respond appropriately to the climate emergency.
“The IMO spent yet another week talking the talk without deciding anything except to kick the can further down the road,” said Faig Abbasov, shipping policy manager at Transport & Environment.
“Everything is slow at the IMO, except for polluting ships, and this needs to change. With Norway and Japan’s proposal, the IMO is being blown off course and will achieve nothing more than ‘greenwashing’ of world shipping.”
Dan Hubbell, shipping emissions campaign manager at Ocean Conservancy, said: “There is a real risk that when developing measures the IMO aims only to achieve the floor of targets set on an unambitious baseline. The IMO must follow the science and aim for full decarbonisation of the shipping sector by 2050 at the latest, and that makes some measures more appropriate than others.”
Related: ‘Clock is ticking’ for IMO to launch emissions reduction measures
Related: Decreasing vessel speeds offer ‘false impression’ of GHG reductions
Related: Shipping CEOs agree on mandatory speed measure for vessels
Related: UK Chamber of Shipping supports ‘ambitious’ GHG reduction strategy
Photo credit: International Maritime Organization
Published: 19 November, 2019
Claiming USD 108,887.87 for the supply and delivery of 310.00 mt of low sulphur marine gas oil at the Port of Jeddah on or about 23 February 2020.
A sanitisation expert offers Manifold Times a summary of the processes involved in disinfecting a ship together with the equipment and products used in the operation.
‘As the saying goes without people buying things, manufacturing will slow, trade will also slow and shipping movements slows down. It’s a whole chain of reaction,’ says Simon Neo.
Laboratory looking to collaborate with Singapore bunker surveyors to roll out COVID 19 testing service, which has been successfully adopted by land-based industries, to the maritime sector.
Sinfeng Marine Services filed an application to the Court of Appeal to withhold information from the liquidators on October 2019; the appeal was dismissed a month later.
‘We have already settled [the issue] with Global Energy Trading and the suit has been withdrawn/discontinued,’ a source at Bunker House Petroleum told Manifold Times.