Sachin Shanbhag, Claims Director of marine insurer, North on Friday (21 February) published an article on new regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the prevention and control of marine pollution from ships:
We refer Members to previous Circulars resting with Circular No 2015/013 of June 2015 on the Regulations of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on the Prevention and Control of Marine Pollution from Ships and the requirement that Owners/Operators of (a) any ship carrying polluting and hazardous cargoes in bulk or (b) any other ship above 10,000 GT enter into a pollution clean-up contract with a Ship Pollution Response Organisation (SPRO) before the ship enters a PRC port or engages in loading, discharge or ship-to-ship transfers outside of the port but within 20 nautical miles off shore.
Members are informed that the PRC Maritime Safety Agency (MSA) recently published new Measures of Administration on Agreement for Ship Pollution Response Regime, which will become effective on 1 March 2020. In conjunction with the new Measures, the MSA has also published a Directory of Hazardous Bulk Liquid Cargo Apt to Cause Pollution (the “Directory”) for which oil booms need to be deployed during cargo operations or an Agreement with a SPRO needs to be concluded. The International Group (IG) has checked this effective date with the China MSA and it has been confirmed that this date will remain as 1 March 2020 and will not be postponed due to the COVID-19 outbreak.
As can be seen from the attached updated SPRO table, there is no material change to the SPRO requirements as a result, however Members will note that from 1 March 2020, no SPRO Agreements will be needed for any of the following:
Oil booming is only required, inter alia, for ships loading, discharging, transferring over 300 MT of cargoes listed in the Directory.
Pursuant to the new Measures, the MSA no longer publishes its own recommended SPRO Agreement wording and the parties are free to negotiate all terms. A new Committee has been established under the auspices of the China Diving and Salvage Association (CDSA) which is due to take responsibility for training and assessing the capabilities of SPROs, establishing a central database for information as to SPRO capabilities and negotiating contract terms. However, this Committee is in its infancy such that for the time-being the position remains unchanged from that advised in the previous Circular (Circular No 2015/013 of June 2015) and Owners are advised to check with local agents, MSAs and the Club for the purposes of identifying SPROs in individual Chinese ports.
Members should also note the following:
The IG has reviewed the existing IG recommended SPRO Agreement wording in light of these developments and, at present, it is recommended that Owners continue to sign SPRO Agreements on the attached IG recommended wording. Members will be informed if there are any changes to the Agreement wording, including in light of any future negotiations with the CDSA Committee. It is recommended that Owners entering into new SPRO arrangements continue to ensure that the SPRO also provides an accompanying response tariff (which can be checked with the Club).
The IG will continue to monitor developments, particularly the work of the CDSA and report to Members. In the interim, any Member requested to agree to a variation of the attached recommended contract is advised to check with the Club to ensure that such variations do not cause the contract to fall outside the scope of the IG Guidelines.
If Members are in any doubt about the contract and SPRO tariff, then it is recommended that they contact the Club before contracting with any SPRO.
All Clubs in the International Group of P&I Clubs have issued similar Circulars.
Source: North
Photo credit: sergio souza on Unsplash
Published: 24 February, 2020
‘By implementing a regional EU ETS, shipping risks getting hit by multiple emission trading systems making a global ETS difficult to achieve,’ states Secretary General.
Customers using the platform will be able to view details including quality of fuel delivered, operational timelines and quantity received per mass flow meter profiles.
Brightoil now hopes to focus on its upstream operations and plans to apply for a new share listing in Shanghai after the restructuring programme is completed.
Battery capacity of 1,458 kWh (equivalent to 40 electric cars) allows the vessel to sail for up to 50km with 2.5 hours of charging; saving 20.16 mt of bunker fuel annually.
The company does not expect to file its annual report within the 15 calendar days after the due date.
The partnership will create a ‘one-stop-shopping’ service for exhaust gas cleaning systems in the region.
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and MPA is working closely with other agencies to monitor the situation, both globally and in Singapore, the port authority tells Manifold Times.
Caroline Yang, President of SSA, addresses issues earlier raised by players; including PMC No. 04, the seven-day restriction, contactless bunkering, sampling point, hose connection, and more.
IBIA Asia, ABIS, sources from Singapore’s bunkering and surveying companies, and an industry veteran share with Manifold Times the issues expected from MPA’s latest Covid-19 measures.
The top three positive movers in the 2020 bunker supplier list are Hong Lam Fuels Pte Ltd (+13); Chevron Singapore Pte Ltd (+12); and SK Energy International (+8), according to MPA list.
‘We will operate in the Singapore bunkering market from the Tokyo, with support from local staff at Sumitomo Corporation Singapore,’ source tells Manifold Times.
Changes include abolishing advance declaration of bunkers as dangerous cargo, reducing pilotage fees on vessels receiving bunkers, and a ‘whitelist’ system for bunker tankers.
