The World Wide Fund For Nature (WWF) on Thursday (15 October) said a proposed international shipping agreement arranged by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) should first close its “huge loopholes” on the ban of HFO in Arctic waters.
WWF’s observations echo an earlier statement made by the Clean Arctic Alliance.
New research from the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) shows that under the current text, only 16% of HFO used by the shipping industry in the region will actually be banned by the regulation.
IMO member states are currently finalizing the text for an Arctic HFO ban that will be voted on in next month’s meeting of the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC).
“Arctic sea ice is melting at an unprecedented rate and that means more and more vessels will be travelling through the region,” said Andrew Dumbrille, sustainable shipping specialist, WWF-Canada.
“That increased traffic brings potential threats to marine life and ecosystems already under stress from a rapidly changing climate.
“Arctic States need to ensure the final agreement fulfils the original intent of the HFO ban and completely eliminate its use by 2024 to protect the food security and livelihoods of local and Indigenous communities from pollution and spills.”
Given the severe risks a heavy fuel oil spill poses to polar environments, the IMO has already banned its use and carriage in the Antarctic.
“There is still time to get this right. If the text is left as is, this will be a ban in name only,” adds Mark Lutes, senior advisor for global climate policy for WWF Climate & Energy.
“HFO is one of the world’s dirtiest fuels, producing higher levels of air and climate pollutants than any other marine fuel.
“Effectively banning HFO in the Arctic is an important step in the IMO fulfilling its commitment to a comprehensive greenhouse gas emissions reduction strategy. The shipping industry must do its part in achieving a net-zero future.”
WWF calls on all Arctic states to lead further negotiations at the IMO to strengthen the current text of the HFO ban on use and carriage for use. States should be calling for the removal of any so-called waivers and exemptions which would delay a full ban, due to come into effect in 2024.
Related: Clean Arctic Alliance: Implications of the IMO’s Draft Heavy Fuel Oil Ban in the Arctic
Related: Clean Arctic Alliance calls out proposed Arctic shipping regulation to be full of loopholes
Photo credit: NOAA
Published: 16 October, 2020
Production and export of LSFO aimed at reducing inventory of HFO and increasing profits, reports Sinopec News Network.
The Infineum Marine Venture Team has built up a good understanding of VLSFO in terms of cold flow properties and the approaches to manage their higher wax content.
Captain Rahul Choudhuri, Managing Director AMEA at VPS, suggests a ban on the obsolete marine fuel quality standards of ISO 8217:2005 and 2012 which no longer apply to the shipping sector.
‘This is a big project that I think many people are taking very seriously and certainly us included,’ says DHT.
Offers pragmatic approach focusing on ‘willful non-compliance’ of sulphur regulations.
Review of the 2015 Guidelines on Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (EGCS) is underway at the IMO, it updates.
Caroline Yang, President of SSA, addresses issues earlier raised by players; including PMC No. 04, the seven-day restriction, contactless bunkering, sampling point, hose connection, and more.
IBIA Asia, ABIS, sources from Singapore’s bunkering and surveying companies, and an industry veteran share with Manifold Times the issues expected from MPA’s latest Covid-19 measures.
The top three positive movers in the 2020 bunker supplier list are Hong Lam Fuels Pte Ltd (+13); Chevron Singapore Pte Ltd (+12); and SK Energy International (+8), according to MPA list.
‘We will operate in the Singapore bunkering market from the Tokyo, with support from local staff at Sumitomo Corporation Singapore,’ source tells Manifold Times.
Changes include abolishing advance declaration of bunkers as dangerous cargo, reducing pilotage fees on vessels receiving bunkers, and a ‘whitelist’ system for bunker tankers.
Claim relates to deliveries of MGO to the vessels Pacific Diligence, Pacific Valkyrie, Pacific Defiance, Crest Alpha 1, and Pacific Warlock between March 2020 to April 2020.
