New York-listed oil and bunker trading firm World Fuel Services (WFS) posted a 37% increase in profit for the first quarter (Q1) ended 31 March 2019.
It recorded net profit of $42.8 million in Q1 2019, compared to profit of $31.2 million in Q1 2018, show latest figures.
Total revenue from its aviation, land and marine segments was $8.68 billion in Q1 2019, 5.5% lower than revenue of $9.18 billion during the similar quarter last year.
“The year-over-year decrease in revenue is principally driven by the decline in volumes in our marine and land segments,” explained WFS Chairman and CEO Michael Kasbar in a recent earning call.
Specifically, the company’s marine segment posted gross profit of $35.2 million in Q1 2019, higher than gross profit of $31.2 million in Q1 2018.
Its marine segment recorded revenue of $1.93 billion in Q1 2019, down from revenue of $2.03 billion in Q1 2018.
“Our marine segment delivered positive year-over-year results and made judicious choices about our portfolio while maintaining a focus on cost efficiency and prudent risk management,” he notes.
“Gross profit margins remain strong in Q1 and our focus on returns on capital is designed to continue that trend.
“We are leveraging the supply and logistics competencies we already have in place across all of our businesses to capture internal synergies, which will further augment our efforts to address the industry challenge, its challenge is inherent within the IMO 2020 low-sulphur regulations.”
In Q1 2019, WFS sold 5.2 million metric tonnes (mt) of marine fuel, down 575,000 mt compared to the first quarter of last year.
“The volume reduction principally related to our continued efforts to exit certain low margin business activities in Asia,” said Kasbar who was optimistic of WFS’s performance for its marine segment, moving forward.
“The marine team continues to focus on growth opportunities, which means our return thresholds including the identification and penetration of new markets,” he adds.
“Our team continues to execute well with core margins and returns remaining well above the prior year.
“Looking ahead to the second quarter, we expect marine gross profit to be similar to the first quarter, which would again, drive solid year-over-year improvement.”
Related: WFS returns to profit for 2018 in ‘year of continuing transformation’
Related: WFS records ‘better than expected performance’ in marine segment
Related: WFS Q2 bunker sales volume 13% down on year
Related: WFS posts Q1 net profit on increase in oil prices, offset by lower volume
Related: WFS posts net loss of $142.0 million in 2017
Photo credit: World Fuel Services
Published: 26 April, 2019
The port of Trieste has appointed three commissioners to ensure business continuity of Depositi Costieri Trieste, it says.
5,000 kWh energy storage system will enable ships to operate with zero emissions while in port- meeting RINA Green Plus class notation.
‘[...]The IHS Markit’s data reveals we are the second largest port network in the international marine lubricants segment,covering a total of 93 countries,’ said Total Lubmarine.
Recent developments from lowered production and recovering economies affecting demand for marine fuel in the shipping market, explains Analyst at Gasum.
‘Digital Twin’ concept does not require hardware on vessel to track bunker fuel consumption and emissions.
Regardless of the decision related to the carbon levy proposal, history has shown that the maritime industry will face new challenges each year.
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.
‘We [Consort Bunkers] have the opinion that the bunker business in Singapore is not related to the widely reported earlier cargo commodity trading mishaps,’ company source tells Manifold Times.
