A final decision by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) to not grant a Texas-based oil and gas pipeline and storage company a US $2.4 million tax refund on bunkers delivered to international vessels at a Texas port was due to rules implemented by the Texas Motor Fuels Tax Code.
A Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts spokesperson Wednesday summarised and pointed out to Manifold Times fuel oil in the U.S. being categorised into various numbers:
“Fuel Oil numbers 1-4 are subject to the Motor Fuels Tax Code but Numbers 5-6, if clearly identified as bunker fuel on the sales invoice, would be subject to sales tax licensing and rules in the Texas Sales & Use Tax Code,” he told Manifold Times.
The unidentified tax claimant was selling bunker fuel to ships from various countries and filed franchise tax refund claims for the reporting years of 2011 through 2013 in 2015, according to the hearing document seen by Manifold Times.
The requested tax refund for fuel oil sales from a Texas port to a foreign registered ship are as follows:
|Report Year||Requested Refund|
The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts (Comptroller) denied the requests because they did not include the necessary documentation.
The claimant later requested a refund hearing contending that its Texas receipts were overstated because they include sales of fuel oil that was used by foreign flagged vessels.
“In the instant matter, Claimant contends its original franchise tax returns erroneously included receipts from the sale of bunker fuel oil to foreign-registered vessels. It argues that the receipts at issue are not Texas receipts because the buyers’ business consisted of transporting goods and passengers across oceans but never between U.S. ports,” said ALJ Victor Simonds.
“It states that, though the product at issue was delivered to vessels that were in Texas, the buyers were not ‘in this state’ because they were not operating in Texas since the buyers could not use or sell the bunker fuel oil in Texas.
“Based on the plain meaning of the apportioning statutes, if tangible personal property is delivered or shipped to a buyer in this state, then the receipt is a Texas receipt.
“It is also clear that the Legislature anticipated that, in some instances, the delivery point and FOB point might not be the same. When they are not, it is the point of delivery that is determinative for apportionment purposes, not the FOB point. The statute does not stand for the proposition that the point of delivery should be disregarded when the FOB and delivery points are the same.
“Claimant delivered its product to purchasers that were in Texas ports and waters; i.e., the bunker fuel oil was purchased by and delivered to buyers that were in this state. Therefore, based on the plain meaning of the statute, Staff’s refund denials were proper because the receipts at issue were Texas receipts.”
The full Comptroller’s decision can be found here.
Published: 13 February, 2019
‘Generally, you have to heat VLSFOs to prevent waxing, but the more you heat them the lower the shelf life is going to be,’ Dr Malcolm Cooper, the Group Managing Director of VPS, tells Manifold Times.
Current low prices for road and aviation fuels in September could mean another increase of flashpoint off-spec cases for MGO when players start introducing the products back into the bunker stream.
Some bunker suppliers at various ports have even achieved their sales target for the year; the trend doesn't seem to be slowing down and suppliers are expecting a boom during end of September.
The company has entered a memorandum of agreement with Millenium Satu Ltd to acquire the 7,550 dwt oil tanker to increase service flexibility; vessel will be paid over an installment period of 36 months.
Deloitte & Touche JMs believe IPP has a viable claim against Dr Goh Jin Hian for breaches of his director’s duties to act with skill, care and diligence which he owned to IPP, states court document.
An earlier MPA notice outlined precautionary measures for personnel to observe when conducting marine refuelling operations at port in order to minimise the risk of contracting Covid-19.