Akshat Arora, Senior Surveyor and Yves Vandenborn, Director of Loss Prevention, of the Standard Club on Tuesday (14 January) published an article to guide members of the shipping community on regulation in the event of unavailability of IMO 2020 compliant fuel; the article has been shared with Manifold Times:
The early days of the IMO 2020 inception are seeing a few disruptions in the bunkering supply chain. The club has been notified by a few concerned members on the non-availability of the compliant fuel at certain ports.
As reported in The Hindu Business Line, the lack of low-sulphur compliant fuel oil may halt ship operations on east coast of India.
Reuters has reported tightening in bunker supply even at some of the main bunkering hubs in Europe, Asia & United States, which has caused an escalation in the price of the compliant fuel.
In order to avoid backlog and delays in bunker supply, members are advised to plan ahead and arrange bunker supply in advance of ship’s arrival at the port.
Documentation
In the event of unavailability of compliant fuel, members are required to document and evidence all steps taken to achieve compliance (Regulation 18.2.1.2). This requires the vessel to inform its flag state (Regulation 18.2.4) and to complete a Fuel Oil Non-Availability Report (FONAR). Regulation 18.2.2 provides that, ‘ships should not be required to deviate or unduly delay the voyage in order to achieve compliance‘.
However, whilst this regulation could potentially act as mitigating circumstances, it is not an exception to compliance. Members are reminded that completion of a FONAR is ‘not a free pass’. Port state control ‘shall take into account all relevant circumstances and the evidence presented to determine the appropriate action to take‘ (Regulation 18.2.3), but the ship will be de facto in breach of MARPOL Annex VI.
IMO’s FONAR guidance on investigating and evidencing procedures can be found on the right.
Members are also recommended to refer to the club’s guidance on this matter.
Source: The Standard Club
Photo credit: Photo by Tim Mossholder on Unsplash
Published: 16 January, 2020
Focuses on the lack of awareness on the importance of recording BDN seal numbers - which protects buyers and sellers in the event of a quality dispute.
‘Responsibility of the marine bunker supply chain cannot be shifted onto ship operators and crews.’
The company stressed that scrubbers was just one of several elements of the company’s overall 2020 fuel sourcing strategy.
WFS arranged for Valero Marketing & Supply Company to physically supply 350 mt to M/T Chem Ranger.
Seeks to align limit for marine distillates with minimum flashpoint of automotive diesel. If successful, new chapter could come into force in 2024.
Seeks to enforce either arbitration clause under contract or to dismiss NuStar and TPP respective liability claims, according to documents obtained by Manifold Times.
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and MPA is working closely with other agencies to monitor the situation, both globally and in Singapore, the port authority tells Manifold Times.
Caroline Yang, President of SSA, addresses issues earlier raised by players; including PMC No. 04, the seven-day restriction, contactless bunkering, sampling point, hose connection, and more.
IBIA Asia, ABIS, sources from Singapore’s bunkering and surveying companies, and an industry veteran share with Manifold Times the issues expected from MPA’s latest Covid-19 measures.
The top three positive movers in the 2020 bunker supplier list are Hong Lam Fuels Pte Ltd (+13); Chevron Singapore Pte Ltd (+12); and SK Energy International (+8), according to MPA list.
‘We will operate in the Singapore bunkering market from the Tokyo, with support from local staff at Sumitomo Corporation Singapore,’ source tells Manifold Times.
Changes include abolishing advance declaration of bunkers as dangerous cargo, reducing pilotage fees on vessels receiving bunkers, and a ‘whitelist’ system for bunker tankers.
