Singapore shipping firm Pacific International Lines (PIL) has left a trade agreement with the Nigerian Federal government due to unfavourable duty and tonnage laws, according to Nigeria media New Telegraph Online.
The Federal Government entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with PIL about two years ago to help Nigeria form a national carrier with stake holding of 60 to 40% between PIL and Nigerian ship owners respectively.
However, the deal did not pull through due to unfavourable Nigerian fiscal policies, tax laws, tonnage tax laws and more; while other countries declare zero duty on imported ships, an average import duty charged in Nigeria for an imported vessel is 14% of its value.
The President of Shipowners Association of Nigeria (SOAN) Engr. Greg Ogbeifun, who was a member of the ministerial committee set up to facilitate the joint venture between PIL and Nigeria, was unhappy with the chance of a Nigerian flagged national fleet gone.
“I am a member of the ministerial committee, I can tell you that PIL pulled out of the deal because the Nigerian fiscal policies do not make establishment of a fleet of that nature possible where they would be involved competition in global trade,” he said.
“Our fiscal policies, tax laws, tonnage tax laws and other laws affect international shipping.
“If you take a Panamax crude tanker of $40 million, you would have to pay another 14% duty in order to import the vessel into the country despite flying Nigerian flag.”
The import tax was the reason why Nigerian shipping firms could not compete internationally as it made the cost of carrying cargo by foreign liners cheaper than shipping companies in Nigeria, says Ogbeifun.
Published: 23 May, 2018
Singapore-based Kwek Kee Seng and local firms Anfasar Trading (S) Pte. Ltd. and Swanseas Port Services Pte. Ltd., including other entities, added to list.
Vessel successfully delivered 7,000 cubic metres LNG bunker fuel via ship-to-ship transfer to a CMA CGM dual fuel container ship on 22 November 2022.
‘The initiatives in the industry are many and it´s a challenge to know which technology or solution will, in the end, prevail,’ explains CEO Carl-Johan Hagman.
Paul Collier, Senior Associate at global law firm Clyde & Co, offers advice to shipowners suspecting off-specification bunker fuel may have been supplied to their vessel.
‘When someone bid at a $45/t discount, I responded “I will buy from you at that price rather than sell.” I shut my laptop and stopped working on that day,’ a bunker supplier said.
‘The JMs have failed to discharge their duties by blindly helping the Banks mount a false case against the Defendant,’ wrote defence lawyers representing former IPP Director Dr Goh Jian Hian in court statement.
Buyers can nominate deliveries on platform and plan operations together with suppliers following ‘one single truth’ concept with all players aware of what has been agreed when and by whom, says DNV spokesman.
Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.
Cost of alternative bunker fuels, bunker operations and technology advancement are some considerations to be examined by the maritime industry, says Neo, director of SDE International Pte Ltd.
Kim Hyung Joon and Han Donghoon were planning to join the Singapore entities of Hartree Group - either Hartree Partners Singapore Pte Ltd or Hartree Marine Fuels - in October, discovered management.
‘When you think of Helmsman on the next occasion, think of us as lawyers with expertise in various fields. Come to us before a problem develops. It’s the process that matters,’ says Tang Chong Jun, Executive Director.
Bernard Chew was a former shareholder of MB Marine and was an authorised signatory of the company’s cheques at the material time, according to court documents obtained by Manifold Times.
