Global stainless-steel manufacturer Outokumpu on Wednesday (4 November) published an article explaining the mechanics behind why stainless steel is a more viable and cost-effective choice for the aggressive corrosion conditions found in marine scrubber units; it was written by Björn Helmersson, a corrosion specialist with Outokumpu:
In 2020, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) introduced new standards intended to reduce sulfur emissions that cause acid rain and air pollution. Their main impact is that the sulfur content in the fuel oil used by merchant vessels is limited to 0.5% globally and 0.1 % in designated Emission Control Areas (ECAs) – the Baltic Sea area, the North Sea area, the United States, Canada, and the United States Caribbean Sea area.
Currently, vessel operators have two main options. They can switch to very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) that contains less than the 0.5 % sulfur limit, but which is more expensive. Or they can install a scrubber that washes the vessel’s exhaust gases so that it can continue to run on high-sulfur fuel (HFO).
Scrubber designs
Generally, the shipping industry uses wet scrubbers (see Figure 1). These exhaust gas cleaning (EGC) systems wash the exhaust gas stream by forcing it into contact with water to remove the sulfur dioxide (SO2), a toxic gas that is directly harmful to human health.
There are three main design arrangements for marine EGCs:
Figure 1 – Open-Loop EGC system (credit: Exhaust Gas Cleaning Association).
Material selection is critical for reliability
The conditions inside a scrubber are very harsh, with a combination of acids, elevated temperatures and a high chloride content in the wash water. To ensure the desired 20-year service life, high-alloyed stainless steels and nickel base alloys are required. It can be devastating to select a material with insufficient corrosion resistance. Yet the safest choice is seldom the most economic one.
Corrosion types and service conditions
There are three main types of corrosion risk found in marine scrubbers:
Pitting corrosion
Crevice corrosion
Uniform corrosion
At the inlet, where the uncleaned gas meets the wash water, there is a mix of wet and dry conditions, with condensing acids from gas and chloride-rich wash water and elevated temperatures. These conditions are very aggressive with a risk of uniform and pitting corrosion.
Within the scrubber body there is a slightly acidic wash water combined with a lower temperature than the inlet. The main risk here is pitting corrosion. Similar conditions apply for other parts of the scrubber system, such as packing material, demisters, tubing and spray nozzles
Crevice corrosion may occur in areas where two surfaces are in close contact, such as flanges, packing material and under deposits.
The influence of scrubber type on material selection
In the open-loop design, the presence of chlorides typically requires the use of high-alloyed materials. In the closed-loop design, where water is recirculated and treated with caustic chemicals, the corrosivity depends on the quality of the wash water. Typically, the conditions are less aggressive than in the open-loop design.
Since the hybrid design alternates between open- and closed-loop operation, materials must be selected according to the most aggressive operating conditions. Therefore, the same materials are used as in an open-loop scrubber.
Operational experience and field testing are vital
Outokumpu has been supplying stainless steel for marine EGCs since 2006. It carries out extensive R&D activities including laboratory testing and long-term field testing in cooperation with marine scrubber OEMs and their customers. The results show that material selection must always be done on a case by case basis.
For the scrubber body, Ultra 254 SMO is one of the most widely used grades. This is a 6% molybdenum and nitrogen-alloyed austenitic stainless steel with extremely high resistance to both uniform and localized corrosion. It was developed initially for oil and gas offshore platforms and the pulp and paper industry.
However, in some cases it is possible to use a 25Cr super duplex stainless steel such as Forta SDX 2507. This offers similar corrosion resistance to Ultra 254 SMO and improved mechanical strength. It is well proven in extremely corrosive environments such as desalination, chemical, or offshore subsea applications.
Standard 22Cr duplex stainless steel can also be used successfully in less aggressive applications such as closed-loop designs and some parts of open-loop scrubbers. A typical example is Forta DX 2205, which is the most popular duplex product on the market. It offers very good resistance to uniform and localized corrosion in combination with high mechanical strength.
Ultra 654 SMO – an alternative for scrubber inlets
As the entry point for hot exhaust gas, the scrubber inlet is a particularly demanding application. Traditionally, Alloy 31 has been the material of choice. It is an iron-nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloy with nitrogen addition developed to fill the gap between special alloyed austenitic stainless steels and nickel alloys.
The test program has established that Ultra 654 SMO offers a viable and more cost-effective alternative. This is a 7% molybdenum and very high nitrogen-alloyed austenitic grade that is the most corrosion resistant stainless steel in the world.
Ultra 654 SMO has a higher mechanical strength than Alloy 31. If the design of the inlet enables this higher strength to be utilized then it could offer weight savings between 15 to 25%. Furthermore, the lower nickel content of Ultra 654 SMO also makes it cost-effective and more stable in price.
Practical examples
Outokumpu currently supplies stainless steel material for use in the construction of around 60% of the marine scrubbers installed every year. Two typical examples include:
Ecospray Technologies S.r.l. Italy (Figure 2) needed a highly corrosion resistant material for its exhaust gas cleaning scrubbers. Ultra 254 SMO proved to be the best combination of performance, price and dimensions.
Figure 2 – Ecospray Technologies scrubber in Ultra 254 SMO.
ContiOcean Environment Tech Co., Ltd. delivers open-loop scrubbers to cargo ships of various size classes. Forta SDX 2507 provides the necessary corrosion resistance for the harsh conditions in the scrubber body (see Figure 3).
Figure 1 – Open-loop marine scrubber manufactured by ContiOcean Environment Tech Co., Ltd in super duplex stainless steel
Summary – key facts about materials for marine scrubbers
Photo credit: Outokumpu
Published: 4 November, 2020
Crew who understand the system and regulatory issues will increase the lifetime of machinery, reduce opex, and, crucially, lower the risk of non-compliance.
The EU environment committee has voted for a ‘phase-out’ of open-loop exhaust scrubbers and calls for members to proceed with its own efforts to decarbonise shipping.
DNV GL speaks with Fabian Kock, head of Environmental Certification at DNV GL on study conducted of owners’ experiences with installing and running scrubbers.
BroadPeak Global LP, Asia Green Fund and The Saudi Arabian Industrial Investments Company has launched Elessent Clean Technologies on 1 January 2022
‘Tackling climate change is too big a challenge for one organisation to fix alone. Radical carbon reduction throughout supply chains is an absolute necessity,’ states UECC spokesman.
Scrubber washwater should not be discharged in Oman's waters unless an approved private facility is used and there is no set limit set for fines for any breach.
Program introduces periodic assessments, mass flow metering data analysis, and regular training for relevant key personnel to better handle the MFMS to ensure a high level of continuous operational competency.
U.S. Claims Register Summary recorded a total USD 833 million claim from a total 180 creditors against O.W. Bunker USA, according to the creditor list seen by Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times.
Glencore purchased fuel through Straits Pinnacle which contracted supply from Unicious Energy. Contaminated HSFO was loaded at Khor Fakkan port and shipped to a FSU in Tanjong Pelepas, Malaysia to be further blended.
Individuals were employees of surveying companies engaged by Shell to inspect the volume of oil loaded onto the vessels which Shell supplied oil to; they allegedly accepted bribes totalling at least USD 213,000.
MPA preliminary investigations revealed that the affected marine fuel was supplied by Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd who later sold part of the same cargo to PetroChina International (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
‘MPA had immediately contacted the relevant bunker suppliers to take necessary steps to ensure that the relevant batch of fuel was no longer supplied. Further investigations are currently on-going,’ it informs.
