The Clean Arctic Alliance, a consortium of 17 non-profit environmental organisations working across 14 countries campaigning for a ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) bunker fuel in the Arctic, says shipowners should look past scrubbers as a solution to the upcoming 2020 sulphur regulations.
"Scrubbers, however, are far from a perfect solution," says Dr Sian Prior, lead advisor to the Clean Arctic Alliance.
"From 2020, in order to reduce sulphur oxide (SOx) emissions from shipping, IMO regulations dictate that fuel must have a maximum of 0.5% sulphur content. Ship operators will need to either switch to low sulphur fuel, or use a scrubber to remove the SOx from the exhaust gas.
"While switching to low-sulphur fuel tackles the problem of air emissions at source, scrubbers are an end-of-pipe technology, which produces a residue (sludge and wash-water) from the cleaning process that needs to be disposed of – and there is concern that scrubber residue and wash-water could end up being dumped in the ocean."
According to Prior, Maersk has identified commercial, technical and operational challenges as its reasons for not investing in scrubbers to meet the new sulphur cap in 2020.
A switch from HFO to distillate fuel will cause minimal or no technical intervention on ships for ship operators.
Enforcement of the sulphur regulation will also be simpler when using low-sulphur fuel, since ships would have no need to carry fuels with a higher sulphur content than 0.5%.
"Ahead of a meeting of IMO member governments in early February which will consider measures to implement the sulphur cap on fuel oil in 2020, the Clean Arctic Alliance is urging Arctic shipping operators against the installation of scrubbers," she states.
"The best protection for the Arctic will be delivered by a move by shipping industry away from heavy fuel oils and towards low sulphur diesel or distillate fuels. Not only will this remove the HFO spill risk, it will reduce emissions of both SOx and black carbon."
Photo credit: Clean Arctic Alliance
Published: 14 February, 2018
Seminar discussed various issues, such as disposal of non-compliant marine fuel after IMO 2020 deadline.
A major contributing factor is longer than expected fuel storage times, thanks to the Covid-19 slowdown in bunker deliveries, writes CEO Ralph Lewis.
Rosneft RMLS 40 low-sulfur marine fuel now available for delivery at ports in the Far East, Black Sea, Arctic and Baltic regions, says the company.
Delayed exhaust gas scrubber installations will further boost demand for IMO-compliant products.
DMA 0.001%S [Ultra Low Sulphur Marine Diesel] and DMB 0.01%S [Low Sulphur Marine Diesel] available at Port of Tauranga, New Zealand.
Most HSFO supplies are based on long-term contracts, as shipowners look to lock in supplies even after the bulk of the market switched to VLSFO, reports Argus Media.
Top three positive movers in 2021 were Hong Lam Fuels Pte Ltd (+14); Sirius Marine Pte Ltd (+12); and TFG Marine (+11); according to the latest data from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore.
Webinar will offer delegates insights on the prevention of operational issues when using VLSFOs, along with an update on biofuels and bunker fuel quality trends for 2021 and its forecast for the current year.
Heating VLSFOs to prevent cold flow issues causes issues related to distillate ageing, and there is a gentle balance to be maintained when handling the product.
Research into n-paraffin distribution of VLSFOs has shown that they not only differ from MGO, but significantly differ from each other as well, states bulletin.
Bunker Holding and Dan-Bunkering have decided not to appeal the city court ruling in the case where the companies were on trial for breaching EU sanctions against Syria, states USTC.
Poll shows market participants think Singapore’s future as a bunkering hub in the near term will be impacted most by growth in alternative bunker fuels and intensifying competition from other ports in Asia.
