New Jersey-based international blending advisory company Refinery Automation Institute, LLC. (RAI) in early April published a research paper focusing on the nonlinearity of bunker component properties and its solutions.
The paper IMO 2020 and the importance of nonlinear blending properties calculation was written by Eliseo Curcio, the Vice President and CFO at RAI.
“This might seem like an easy concept, but the majority of blenders and shipowners calculate bunker blend component properties linearly,” he said.
“This is a large mistake, one that overestimates or underestimates valuable or safety-related properties (i.e., viscosity, flashpoint, pour point, etc.) and can result in significant financial losses.”
Curcio explained bunker fuel oil and hydrocarbon based components do not “attract” each other, and chemical interactions modify the behaviour of the solution or blend when components are mixed together.
He showed examples of differences between results of linear and nonlinear calculated bunker blends, and validated the accuracy of nonlinear calculations with data from a fuel testing laboratory.
“The IMO 2020 sulfur bunker regulations make it economically vital to consider the difference between linear and nonlinear property calculation results, and their potential impact on profit or loss,” concludes Curcio.
“A terminal or refinery that produces 100,000 tpd of bunker fuel shows a difference of $44 MM/yr in profit just by considering the nonlinearity of the blend property calculation.
“The economic benefit is not the only advantage of using the nonlinear correlation. As previously mentioned, using the wrong calculations for properties like flashpoint, pour point and compatibility can significantly impact the quality of the final bunker product, as well as the safety of operations.
“Blenders and terminal operators should sell compliant VLSFO that meets all specifications and is both stable and compatible.”
The complete paper IMO 2020 and the importance of nonlinear blending properties calculation is available for viewing at this link.
Related: ISO 8217 standard not realistic for 0.5%S VLSFO, says bunker blending veteran
Photo credit: Refinery Automation Institute
Published: 8 April, 2020
Alexei Medvedev (pictured) and Mikhail Antonov explain how regulation will affect the company in an interview.
Japan’s first syndicated loan certified by Japan Credit Rating Agency Ltd. with highest ranking of ‘Green 1.’
Issues Work Instructions to certify ‘qualifying engines’ for earlier vessels, writes legal firm Blank Rome.
Revised guidelines on scrubber air and water discharge performance made more stringent; to be adopted after the MEPC meeting in early April.
Global price reporting agency remains the only publisher of LSFO 0.5% delivered bunker assessments.
Vessels entering Taiwanese ports to use 0.5% sulphur limit marine fuel from 1st January 2019.
Sukumar Verma, Managing Director at Informa Connect Singapore, explains how the world’s largest bunkering event will be virtually carried out between 6 to 8 October 2020.
David John Kidd amassed losses of over SGD 1 million to Lukoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd through multiple irregular trades with Transocean Oil over a four-month period in 2016.
Helmsman LLC lawyers discuss pausing of LC payment, what it means for parties buying ships from companies of a group affected by fraud allegations, and trafficking in spent bills of lading.
Beluga Asia has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with Sun Marine Corporation to acquire bunker tanker M.T. MA Veronica for USD 2.45 million.
Listing of Brightoil’s shares on the Stock Exchange was cancelled on 16 March 2020, according to a written Judgement of Russell Coleman, a Judge of the Court of First Instance.
‘To this end, the Bank has shown there are grounds for suspecting the CIA Contract may be a sham / fake contract and/or was not performed,’ said CMB’s submission to the Singapore court.
