New Jersey-based international blending advisory company Refinery Automation Institute, LLC. (RAI) in early April published a research paper focusing on the nonlinearity of bunker component properties and its solutions.
The paper IMO 2020 and the importance of nonlinear blending properties calculation was written by Eliseo Curcio, the Vice President and CFO at RAI.
“This might seem like an easy concept, but the majority of blenders and shipowners calculate bunker blend component properties linearly,” he said.
“This is a large mistake, one that overestimates or underestimates valuable or safety-related properties (i.e., viscosity, flashpoint, pour point, etc.) and can result in significant financial losses.”
Curcio explained bunker fuel oil and hydrocarbon based components do not “attract” each other, and chemical interactions modify the behaviour of the solution or blend when components are mixed together.
He showed examples of differences between results of linear and nonlinear calculated bunker blends, and validated the accuracy of nonlinear calculations with data from a fuel testing laboratory.
“The IMO 2020 sulfur bunker regulations make it economically vital to consider the difference between linear and nonlinear property calculation results, and their potential impact on profit or loss,” concludes Curcio.
“A terminal or refinery that produces 100,000 tpd of bunker fuel shows a difference of $44 MM/yr in profit just by considering the nonlinearity of the blend property calculation.
“The economic benefit is not the only advantage of using the nonlinear correlation. As previously mentioned, using the wrong calculations for properties like flashpoint, pour point and compatibility can significantly impact the quality of the final bunker product, as well as the safety of operations.
“Blenders and terminal operators should sell compliant VLSFO that meets all specifications and is both stable and compatible.”
The complete paper IMO 2020 and the importance of nonlinear blending properties calculation is available for viewing at this link.
Related: ISO 8217 standard not realistic for 0.5%S VLSFO, says bunker blending veteran
Photo credit: Refinery Automation Institute
Published: 8 April, 2020
Methanol provides a safe and effective carrying medium for hydrogen, enabling adoption of clean zero emission fuel cell power solutions, says firm.
Purchases 8,200-dwt MT African Sprinter to continue bunker operations off Namibia in West Africa.
Shipowner continued contract with engineering firm after initial retrofit project of two hybrid scrubbers.
Electronic meetings of creditors for An Guang Shipping and Xin Bo Shipping have been arranged for 25 February, according to Government Gazette posts.
CircFuel project will further develop technology so that the waste used provides both energy for cement production and liquid fuel with a low CO2 footprint.
Muhamad Farhan Bin Mohamed Rashid was allegedly involved in charges related to criminal breach of trust, money laundering, and drug offences, according to court documents seen by Manifold Times.
Cash of SGD 4.43 million and USD 243,100, and one piece of 100-gram gold-coloured bar recovered in safe belonging to Abdul Latif Bin Ibrahim kept at Extra Space warehouse storage facility, show court documents.
Program introduces periodic assessments, mass flow metering data analysis, and regular training for relevant key personnel to better handle the MFMS to ensure a high level of continuous operational competency.
U.S. Claims Register Summary recorded a total USD 833 million claim from a total 180 creditors against O.W. Bunker USA, according to the creditor list seen by Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times.
Glencore purchased fuel through Straits Pinnacle which contracted supply from Unicious Energy. Contaminated HSFO was loaded at Khor Fakkan port and shipped to a FSU in Tanjong Pelepas, Malaysia to be further blended.
Individuals were employees of surveying companies engaged by Shell to inspect the volume of oil loaded onto the vessels which Shell supplied oil to; they allegedly accepted bribes totalling at least USD 213,000.
MPA preliminary investigations revealed that the affected marine fuel was supplied by Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd who later sold part of the same cargo to PetroChina International (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
