Audit, Tax and Advisory services firm KPMG in late January issued an update addressing whether receipts from sales of bunker fuel oil delivered to vessels as in Texas ports and waters are Texas sourced receipts and liable for tax:
A Texas Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recently addressed whether receipts from sales of bunker fuel oil delivered to foreign-registered vessels in Texas ports and waters were Texas sourced receipts.
The taxpayer, an oil and gas pipeline and storage company, sold bunker fuel oil to ships from various countries. On its original franchise tax returns, the taxpayer included receipts from the sale of fuel oil to foreign-registered vessels in Texas ports in its Texas apportionment factor.
However, the taxpayer later filed amended returns claiming that its Texas receipts were overstated because it included the sales of fuel oil to foreign vessels.
Under Texas law, receipts from sales of tangible personal property are sourced to Texas if the property is delivered or shipped to a buyer in the state.
The FOB point, location of title passage, and other conditions of the sale are not relevant to the determination of Texas gross receipts.
The taxpayer argued that receipts from sales of fuel oil to foreign vessels were not Texas receipts because the buyers were not operating in Texas and were therefore not “in the state.”
The ALJ disagreed. In his view, the oil was delivered to vessels in Texas ports and Texas waters and therefore the receipts were Texas receipts. Moreover, under the Comptroller’s rules, revenue from transactions occurring in Texas waters were Texas receipts.
The taxpayer also argued that the rule conflicted with the statute and the statute was unconstitutional, but the ALJ did not have jurisdiction to address these claims. The taxpayer also argued that Texas franchise tax laws were preempted by federal statute- the Maritime Transportation Security Act.
However, the ALJ determined that the taxpayer failed to present any legal authority to support its preemption argument.
Source: KPMG
Published: 12 February, 2019
Company believes market and business partners ‘likely to have greater confidence and comfort in continuing business dealings’ if placed under judicial management, says Director.
Sinfeng Marine Services filed an application to the Court of Appeal to withhold information from the liquidators on October 2019; the appeal was dismissed a month later.
Owner and operator liable for crew’s wrongdoings even if they are acting for their own benefit.
‘Sinfeng is of the view that the documents in relation to almost all of the alleged debts are not genuine.’
Defendants allegedly neglected duties, leaving Aegean’s former CEO, Dimitris Melisanidis, free to defraud firm.
Captain could not produce sufficient documents to prove legality of 3 million litres of gasoline onboard.
IBIA Asia, ABIS, sources from Singapore’s bunkering and surveying companies, and an industry veteran share with Manifold Times the issues expected from MPA’s latest Covid-19 measures.
The top three positive movers in the 2020 bunker supplier list are Hong Lam Fuels Pte Ltd (+13); Chevron Singapore Pte Ltd (+12); and SK Energy International (+8), according to MPA list.
‘We will operate in the Singapore bunkering market from the Tokyo, with support from local staff at Sumitomo Corporation Singapore,’ source tells Manifold Times.
Changes include abolishing advance declaration of bunkers as dangerous cargo, reducing pilotage fees on vessels receiving bunkers, and a ‘whitelist’ system for bunker tankers.
Claim relates to deliveries of MGO to the vessels Pacific Diligence, Pacific Valkyrie, Pacific Defiance, Crest Alpha 1, and Pacific Warlock between March 2020 to April 2020.
3,490 mt of LSFO from Itochu Enex was lifted at Universal Terminal; the same bunker stem was bought by Global Marine Logistics and delivered by bunker tanker Juma to receiving vessel Kirana Nawa.
