The Lloyd’s Register Fuel Oil Bunkering Analysis and Advisory Service (FOBAS) on Friday (12 April) issued an alert informing all shipowners and operators of high acid number and possible fuel contamination at Fujairah:
Over recent weeks FOBAS has tested a number of fuels from Fujairah with elevated acid number (TAN). The tested TAN values were all well above the average for the port (0.12mgKOH/g).
Acid number can be a reflection of naturally occurring naphthenic acids in the fuel from the crude source or a reflection of contamination with acidic compounds. High acid number fuel due to naphthenic acids are common in certain parts of the world (although not previously Fujairah) and are not considered problematic during use. Fuels contaminated with extraneous acidic compounds however have been linked to many operational problems in the past. ISO 8217 recognises that presence of acids even if within the specified limits of ISO 8217:2010 i.e. 2.5 mg KOH/g, can cause operational problems if the acids present in fuels are not naturally occurring Naphthenic acids.
Investigative analysis using FTIR and GCMS test methods has been carried out on a selection of these fuels and the results show a mixed picture of contamination with low levels of certain fatty acids and phenols. Some of the specific compounds detected include 4 cumyl phenol, Bisphenol and commonly found fatty acids Palmitic and Stearic acids. All individual components have been found at low levels but in combination with a number of unidentified components the total concentration in some cases is much higher.
Past experience has shown some of these components have been linked with severe operational problems, particularly around filters, fuel injection pumps and fuel injectors. We would like to reiterate that any such contaminants even at low levels contravenes the stipulations of Revised MARPOL Annex VI regulation 18.3 and International Marine Fuel Standard ISO 8217, Clause 5.
Further to this for vessels bunkering at this port we would recommend as a precaution to test any HFO for its acid number if not already doing so as standard and confirm with suppliers that they are supplying fuel in compliance with MARPOL Annex VI Reg 18.3 and ISO8217 general requirements clause 5.
Photo credit: Port of Fujairah
Published: 15 April, 2019
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.
‘We [Consort Bunkers] have the opinion that the bunker business in Singapore is not related to the widely reported earlier cargo commodity trading mishaps,’ company source tells Manifold Times.
Representatives of INTERTANKO, Helmsman and Rajah & Tann gather to discuss IMO 2020, legal frameworks for the purchase and supply of alternative marine fuels, and the handling of bunker claims.