Connect with us

Biofuel

ENGINE: Knowledge gaps are hidden barriers to biofuel term contracts, says FincoEnergies

Lack of knowledge on pricing, quality and product availability for biofuels is leading to hesitation in signing term agreements, FincoEnergies told ENGINE.

Admin

Published

on

fincoenergies logo

Lack of knowledge on pricing, quality and product availability for biofuels is leading to hesitation in signing term agreements, FincoEnergies told ENGINE.  

When it comes to biofuels, a lack of knowledge and visibility on biofuel prices is one of the main reasons shipping companies are hesitant to close term contracts today, Johannes Schürmann, commercial director of FincoEnergies’ marine division said.

"We have pitched to quite a few customers about closing a term contract, maybe a 1- or 2-year contract based on one biofuel pricing index, but we haven’t succeeded," Schürmann explained. "The main reason is that internally, they need board approval to lock in certain price levels. They prefer using a floating price with a fossil index, like ICE Gasoil plus a fixed premium, to calculate their exact financial exposure."

While some globally accepted pricing indexes for biofuels exist, shipping companies often lack access to these essential price points. And without reliable pricing information, these companies struggle to make informed decisions, making them reluctant to engage in long-term commitments. 

“The main reason is they have no clue [about] the pricing indexes in biofuel,” Schürmann said.

To address this, Schürmann argued for fixed-term contracts, which lock in prices over an agreed period, reducing exposure to spot market fluctuations and easing logistical challenges related to adjusting barge or cargo deliveries.

Another challenge is uncertainty about availability of biofuels, particularly outside major bunkering hubs like ARA and Singapore. Suppliers in more and more ports have launched biofuel bunker operations, but there is a perception among shipowners that availability is still lacking and that opting for biofuels to comply with regulations like FuelEU Maritime in the EU can reduce their flexibility if they call at ports without availability.

Term contracts can help mitigate these risks by sending firm demand signals to suppliers, who can then plan future investments and establish logistics to meet increased bunker demand, according to Schürmann.

The sulphur factor for biofuels  

Different grades of biofuels can be used in the road, shipping or power generation industries. However, quality differences among these grades can significantly impact pricing in the shipping sector, Schürmann emphasised. This variability can make it difficult for buyers to predict costs accurately, which in turn can influence their decision to sign term contracts.

Some biofuels can be used interchangeably as road or bunker fuels. Others have higher sulphur content, which makes them unsuitable for road while still acceptable for shipping. 

For instance, a product with 20 ppm sulphur content cannot be used by vehicles because it exceeds the road standard cap of 10 ppm. But it can be used in shipping since it is below the International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) 0.10% - or 1,000 ppm - cap. This product may be sold at a discount because it is limited to bunkering, he explained.  

Biomethanol's quality and pricing labyrinth  

The pricing situation becomes even more challenging for new alternative fuels like low-carbon methanol or ammonia, Schürmann argued.  

For instance, he said, green ammonia is not yet widely available, making it difficult to establish prices for it. Methanol, and especially biomethanol, currently lacks a standardised pricing mechanism for shipping. Some companies provide individual quotes, but market prices vary widely across suppliers. This can complicate decision-making for buyers considering these emerging bunker fuels. 

Discrepancy in quality and regulations can add another layer of complexity to the pricing structures for fuels like biomethanol. 

Biomethanol quality, especially for prototype batches, can differ significantly. Specifications of methanol supplied for shipping are gradually aligning with the International Methanol Producers and Consumers Association (IMPCA) Reference Specifications.  

The IMPCA reference specs are a set of standards that define fuel quality of methanol by testing for elements like chloride, sulphur, hydrocarbons, acidity and volatility.

These specifications help ensure consistency within methanol grades. But there remains some uncertainty about the range of methanol grades that engine manufacturers like MAN Energy Solutions and Wärtsilä can accept. Engine manufacturers are still determining which specifications to allow and finalise, which complicates methanol's pricing and market readiness.  

As methanol begins aligning with chemical industry specifications, any quality variations or unmet specifications could create price disparities depending on which industries can utilise the product, he added. 

Given this uncertainty, shipping companies might feel it is more prudent to adopt a wait-and-see approach, preferring to engage in spot or very short-term deals like quarterly agreements, rather than committing to multiple-year contracts. 

Addressing the biomethanol demand drought 

FincoEnergies started offering truck-to-ship biomethanol deliveries in the Port of Amsterdam last year. But demand remains low.

“We have had biomethanol in stock for over a year; we have a truck ready to deliver, and we have the parts ready to deliver, but we see that demand for biomethanol is very, very low,” Schürmann said. 

The company is still betting on this fossil fuel alternative because it expects demand to pick up in the near-term.

"Whilst current demand is developing, the company maintains its commitment to biomethanol, supported by industry movements such as Maersk's recent long-term methanol sourcing agreement," he said.

There are now 43 methanol-capable vessels in operation globally and another 342 vessels are on order for deliveries towards 2033, according to classification society DNV's database.

“So yeah, we need to invest in that [fuel],” Schürmann said.  

To offset financial risks, he thinks that fuel suppliers should strike the right balance between spot deliveries and term contracts.  

"There will be shipping companies that close contracts; you only need to find the right ones, and you need to set up a partnership approach.”  

By Konica Bhatt

 

Photo credit: FincoEnergies
Source: ENGINE
Published: 18 November, 2024

Continue Reading

Biofuel

Argus Media: IMO incentive to shape bio-bunker choices

IMO proposal for ship owners who exceed emissions reduction targets to earn surplus credits will play a key role in biofuel bunkering options going forward.

Admin

Published

on

By

resized argusmedia

An International Maritime Organization (IMO) proposal for ship owners who exceed emissions reduction targets to earn surplus credits will play a key role in biofuel bunkering options going forward.

22 April 2025 

The price of these credits will help determine whether B30 or B100 becomes the preferred bio-bunker fuel for vessels not powered by LNG or methanol. It will also influence whether biofuel adoption is accelerated or delayed beyond 2032.

At the conclusion of its meeting earlier this month the IMO proposed a dual-incentive mechanism to curb marine GHG emissions starting in 2028. The system combines penalties for non-compliance with financial incentives for over-compliance, aiming to shift ship owner behavior through both "stick" and "carrot" measures. As the "carrot", ship owners whose emissions fall below the IMO's stricter compliance target will receive surplus credits, which can be traded on the open market. The "stick" will introduce a two-tier penalty system. If emissions fall between the base and direct GHG emissions tiers, vessel operators will pay a fixed penalty of $100/t CO2-equivalent. Ship owners whose emissions exceed the looser, tier 2, base target will incur a penalty of $380/t CO2e. Both tiers tighten annually through 2035.

The overcompliance credits will be traded on the open market. It is unlikely that they will exceed the cost of the tier 2 penalty of $380/t CO2e. Argus modeled two surplus credit price scenarios — $70/t and $250/t CO2e — to assess their impact on bunker fuel economics. Assessments from 10-17 April showed Singapore very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) at $481/t, Singapore B30 at $740/t, and Chinese used cooking oil methyl ester (Ucome), or B100, at $1,143/t (see charts).

If the outright prices remain flat, in both scenarios, VLSFO would incur tier 1 and tier 2 penalties, raising its effective cost to around $563/t in 2028. B30 in both scenarios would receive credits putting its price at $653/t and $715/t respectively. In the high surplus credit scenario, B100 would earn roughly $580/t in credits, bringing its net cost to about $563/t, on par with VLSFO, and more competitive than B30. In the low surplus credit scenario, B100 would earn just $162/t in credits, lowering its cost to approximately $980/t, well above VLSFO.

At these spot prices, and $250/t CO2e surplus credit, B100 would remain the cheapest fuel option through 2035. At $70/t CO2e surplus credit, B30 becomes cost-competitive with VLSFO only after 2032. Ultimately, the market value of IMO over-compliance credits will be a major factor in determining the timing and extent of global biofuel adoption in the marine sector.

By Stefka Wechsler

Scenario 1, $70/t surplus credit $/t

Scenario 1, $70/t surplus credit $/t

Scenario 2, $250/t surplus credit $/t

Scenario 2, $250/t surplus credit $/t

 

Photo credit and source: Argus Media
Published: 22 April, 2025

Continue Reading

FuelEU

FincoEnergies launches pooling service for FuelEU Maritime compliance

FuelEU Pooling service enables undercompliant vessels to meet their compliance targets by pooling with vessels running on GoodFuels sustainable bio bunker fuels.

Admin

Published

on

By

fincoenergies logo

GoodFuels biofuel supplier FincoEnergies on Wednesday (16 April) announced the launch of its FuelEU Pooling service, created to enable shipowners to meet FuelEU Maritime compliance in a cost-effective way.

FuelEU Maritime, effective from 1 January 2025, mandates the reduction of greenhouse gas intensity of energy used on board ships trading in the EU. For many operators, particularly those with limited access to low-carbon fuels, compliance can be both complex and costly.

Designed for shipowners, operators, charterers, and technical managers, FincoEnergies’ FuelEU Pooling service enables undercompliant vessels to meet their compliance targets by pooling with vessels running on GoodFuels sustainable biofuels, when these vessels are overcompliant and have ‘Surplus’ emission reduction available for allocation.

FincoEnergies also partnered with Lloyd’s Register (LR), who supported the development of the service. Their technical expertise has enabled shaping a solution that aligns with both regulatory requirements and FincoEnergies' established position as a biofuel supplier in the fuel supply chain.

“FuelEU Maritime represents one of the most important regulatory shifts for the shipping industry in decades,” said Alberto Perez, Global Head, Maritime Commercial Markets at LR. “By integrating technical expertise with strategic guidance, we ensure shipowners, operators, and suppliers not only comply with evolving emissions standards, but also proactively transform their operations, embracing new technologies and alternative fuels to ensure a sustainable and profitable future.”

“With a decade of experience in biofuel bunkers and carbon certificate trading in the voluntary market, we are excited to expand our creative and solution-oriented product portfolio with FuelEU Pooling,” said Johannes Schurmann, Commercial Director International Marine at FincoEnergies. 

“Thanks to our physical presence in the supply chain, shipping companies looking for FuelEU surplus can confidently rely on us as a trusted partner in their decarbonisation journey.”

Through its role as Pool Organiser, FincoEnergies streamlines the entire pooling process – from performing biofuel bunkers and prefinancing Surplus, to Surplus allocation and pool verification. With cost-effective pricing, FuelEU Pooling provides shipping companies with a competitive alternative for changing their fuel mix themselves.

 

Photo credit: FincoEnergies
Published: 21 April, 2025

Continue Reading

Financial Result

CBL International reports net loss of USD 3.87 million for FY 2024

Despite the net loss, CBL reports a 35.9% revenue increase, which was primarily driven by a 38.1% increase in sales volume, supported by the addition of new customers during the year and more.

Admin

Published

on

By

buildings

CBL International Limited (CBL), the listing vehicle of Banle Group, a leading marine fuel logistic company in the Asia-Pacific region, on Thursday (17 April) announced its annual financial results for the year ended 31 December 2024.

The company reported a consolidated revenue of USD 592.52 million for the year, marking a 35.9% increase from USD 435.90 million in 2023. 

This growth was primarily driven by a 38.1% increase in sales volume, supported by the addition of new customers during the year, expansion of its supply network to cover more ports, and a broader customer base that now includes bulk carriers and oil and gas tankers in addition to container liner operators.

However, due to challenging market conditions, CBL reported a net loss of USD 3.87 million in 2024, compared to a net income of USD 1.13 million in 2023. 

This was mainly attributed to a 25.5% decrease in gross profit to USD 5.37 million in 2024 from USD 7.21 million in 2023 and a 56.8% rise in operating expenses to USD 8.70 million in 2024 from USD 5.55 million in 2023. 

The company adopted a volume-driven growth strategy that involved offering more competitive pricing in a market characterised by intensified competition and pricing pressure. 

“While this approach supported increased sales volume and market share, it also contributed to narrower profit margins,” it said. 

In addition to reduced gross margins, the net loss was impacted by increased expenses for business expansion, biofuel operation, additional expenses to enhance ESG, and a rise in interest expenses. These were partially offset by a reduction in income tax expenses. 

The financial outcome reflects both the dynamic nature of the bunkering industry and the company’s ongoing investment in client base development and geographic growth, which are expected to enhance long-term positioning as market conditions normalise.

Earnings per share (EPS) reflected this, decreasing to USD (0.136) in 2024 from USD 0.045 in 2023. Cash and cash equivalents increased by 8.3% to USD 8.02 million as of December 31, 2024 from USD 7.40 million as of December 31, 2023.

Business Expansion in Challenging Times

CBL International’s operational expansion was a key focus in 2024, particularly in a challenging industry environment marked by geopolitical tensions, such as the Red Sea crisis and broader Middle East tensions. The company grew its service network from 36 ports at the time of its IPO in March 2023 to over 60 ports by year-end 2024, covering Asia Pacific, Europe, Africa, and Central America. Revenue growth year-on-year was notable across China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, and South Korea.

Key new ports included Mauritius, Panama, and India, enhancing its global reach. This expansion was supported by servicing nine of the world’s top 12 container shipping lines, representing nearly 60% of global container fleet capacity. The Company’s European expansion focused on strengthening cross-regional service offerings for Euro–Asia trade routes. Growth was supported by a stronger presence in the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) region and a new Ireland office established in late 2023, enhancing local sourcing capabilities.

Customer diversification was another priority, with the share of non-container liners in total revenue increased, and sales concentration among the top five customers declined in fiscal year 2024.

A significant highlight was the company’s push towards sustainability, with biofuel sales surging by 628.8% and volume by 603.0%. The introduction of B24 biofuel (76% fossil fuel, 24% used cooking oil methyl ester) in Hong Kong, China, and Malaysia reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 20%, supported by ISCC EU and ISCC Plus certifications secured in 2023. This aligns with global trends towards greener shipping solutions and positions CBL as a leader in sustainable fuel logistics.

Strategically, CBL enhanced its IT systems, implementing real-time order tracking, data analytics, and workflow automation to improve efficiency. Credit risk management was strengthened, and working capital management improved with increased factoring facilities and a cash balance rise, navigating macroeconomic challenges through pricing strategies and port network adjustments. Additionally, CBL expanded its funding sources by accessing capital markets, such as private placement, increasing financial flexibility to support growth initiatives.

CBL’s Outlook for the Future

Despite the net loss, CBL’s management remains optimistic about the future, viewing current industry challenges as an opportunity to build resilience and enhance customer loyalty. 

While prudently evaluating the impact of the latest US tariff policy, among other macro incidents such as geopolitical tensions, regulatory changes, and shifting global trade dynamics, on the economy and the bunkering sector, CBL believes its broad global network, primarily focused on intra-Asia and Euro-Asia trade routes, helps mitigate potential adverse effects. Since the company has no operation on U.S. ports, the impact of such policies may be limited in the near future.

The company’s strategic expansion of ports, diversification of its client base, and commitment to sustainable initiatives are designed to position it for growth when market conditions improve.

By investing in new ports and expanding relationships with key industry players, CBL aims to secure long-term partnerships that will strengthen its market position as global trade stabilises and profitability improves.

Dr. Teck Lim Chia, Chairman and CEO of CBL International Limited, stated, “We are confident in our strategy to expand our service network, maximise sales volume and explore sustainable offerings, even in these challenging times.”

“Our investments in new ports, diversified clients, and sustainable fuels are building a foundation for future growth. We believe that by demonstrating our capabilities at present, we will earn customer loyalty that will yield substantial benefits as the market recovers, positioning CBL International for significant success in the years ahead.”

Looking ahead, CBL remains focused on expanding its market presence, particularly in biofuels, and enhancing its global supply network. 

 

Photo credit: Kyle Sudu on Unsplash
Published: 17 April, 2025

Continue Reading
Advertisement
  • Aderco Manifold Website Advert EN
  • Consort advertisement v2
  • EMF banner 400x330 slogan
  • v4Helmsman Gif Banner 01
  • RE 05 Lighthouse GIF
  • SBF2
  • Sea Trader & Sea Splendor
  • Zhoushan Bunker

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS

  • HL 2022 adv v1
  • Singfar advertisement final
  • Triton Bunkering advertisement v2
  • MFT 25 01 E Marine Logo Animation
  • SEAOIL 3+5 GIF


  • 300 300
  • CNC Logo Rev Manifold Times
  • NW Logo advertisement
  • Innospec logo v6
  • Mokara Final
  • PSP Marine logo
  • Synergy Asia Bunkering logo MT
  • metcore
  • MFA logo v2
  • endress
  • Advert Shipping Manifold resized1
  • VPS 2021 advertisement
  • LabTechnic

Trending