Connect with us
DNV Decarbonization Insight Series August 2026 - What maritime professionals should know about AI Training

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (13 May 2026)

Bunker supply tight in Singapore; bunker availability improves in Zhoushan; fuel availability tight across all grades in Fujairah.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • Bunker supply tight in Singapore
  • Bunker availability improves in Zhoushan
  • Fuel availability tight across all grades in Fujairah

Singapore and Malaysia

VLSFO and HSFO availability in Singapore is very tight right now. VLSFO delivery schedules in the port have stretched further, now ranging between 12-14 days, compared to 9-18 days previously. HSFO lead times stand at 9-14 days, from last week’s 4-10-day window. LSMGO availability has tightened as well, with lead times extending to 8-9 days, from last week’s 5-9 days.

There are very limited suppliers offering small HSFO parcels in Singapore, and a premium is expected for quantities of 500 mt and below, a trader said.

At Malaysia’s Port Klang, VLSFO supply remains relatively stable, especially for smaller prompt volumes. Tighter conditions persist for LSMGO, while HSFO availability continues to face constraints, making both grades increasingly difficult to secure.

East Asia

Availability in Zhoushan has slightly improved this week, with lead times for all grades shortening to around 4-7 days, down from last week’s 5-7 days.

Bunker availability across northern China remains mixed, with lead times ranging between 4-7 days for all grades. Dalian and Qingdao are well supplied with VLSFO and LSMGO, although HSFO is tight in Qingdao. In Shanghai, VLSFO and HSFO availability is limited, while LSMGO supply remains relatively stable.

Prompt bunker fuel availability has improved in southern Chinese ports. Lead times here range between 3-6 days, another trader said. Notably, Fuzhou is tight on both VLSFO and LSMGO, while Xiamen has adequate VLSFO but limited LSMGO.

HSFO availability in Hong Kong is exceptionally this week. Expected lead times for all grades are around seven days at least.

Taiwan’s bunker market remains steady, according to another trader. Lead times are approximately four days for both VLSFO and LSMGO at Keelung. In Hualien, Taichung and Kaohsiung, lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO range between 2-3 days. There are no barges available at Suao and Hualien, the trader said.

In South Korea’s southern ports – Busan, Ulsan, Masan, Onsan, Yeosu and Kwangyang – availability of all three conventional bunker grades is tight. Recommended lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO are at around 7-10 days, up from last week’s 3-5 days.

Across western ports, including Incheon, Daesan, Dangjin, Pyeongtaek and Taean, lead times remain around eight days for all grades, higher than the previous week’s estimates of five days.

In Japan, supply conditions remain largely tight across key hubs such as Tokyo Bay, Nagoya and Osaka. “Major Japanese refiners have significantly curtailed spot supply for ocean-going vessels to prioritize domestic demand,” a trader said.

Overall, LSMGO availability in Japanese ports is extremely scarce, the trader said. “A domestic shortage of gasoil has led to a near-total absence of offers for the bunker market,” he added.

Recommended lead times stand at approximately 10-11 days for HSFO and VLSFO across major ports including Tokyo, Nagoya, Osaka.

Oceania

Bunker supply conditions vary across Australia’s east coast. In New South Wales, VLSFO can be delivered in Port Kembla by truck or pipeline. Suppliers in Sydney have ample VLSFO and LSMGO stocks, though HSFO availability remains constrained, with lead times of about seven days.

In Western Australia, VLSFO supply in Kwinana and Fremantle is available through a single barge operator, with lead times generally standing at about seven days.

In Queensland, suppliers in Brisbane and Gladstone are indicating lead times of around seven days for VLSFO and LSMGO. Deliveries of VLSFO and LSMGO are carried out by two separate barges operated by different suppliers, while HSFO supply depends on request.

Supply conditions in Victoria are comparatively steady, with Melbourne and Geelong holding sufficient VLSFO inventories, although prompt HSFO supply remains tight. Bunker operations at both ports rely on a single barge, with recommended lead times of roughly seven days.

In New Zealand, bunker availability continues to be steady. VLSFO is easily accessible in Tauranga and Auckland, with certain Tauranga berths linked to pipeline infrastructure. At Marsden Point, vessels can receive both VLSFO and LSMGO directly through pipeline deliveries.

South Asia

In India, VLSFO availability continues to be constrained at Kandla, Sikka, Hazira and New Mangalore.

Prompt bunker supply remains strong in Sri Lanka, with Colombo and Hambantota carrying sufficient stocks across all fuel grades and at least one supplier capable of offering immediate deliveries.

Middle East

Prompt bunker availability in Fujairah across all grades is very tight currently, with supply across all grades subject to enquiry, another source said.

Bunker demand has substantially dropped in Fujairah as many vessels continue to wait until transit through the Strait of Hormuz – currently under a US blockade – clears. Only a handful of suppliers can provide fuel grades in the port, “as no imports coming in at the moment,” the source said.

Bunker demand in Saudi Arabia’s Jeddah is moderate. There is adequate LSMGO available at the port, while VLSFO remains constrained.

Operations at Kuwait’s Shuaiba and Shuwaikh continue without disruption. Meanwhile, LSMGO availability is tight at Djibouti.

In Qatar, bunkering is proceeding without issues at Hamad, Doha and Al Ruwais, with operations also ongoing at Mesaieed and Ras Laffan. However, VLSFO and LSMGO supply remains constrained in Ras Laffan.

By Aparupa Mazumder

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 13 May, 2026

Continue Reading

Legal

Singapore police arrest eight over alleged illegal MGO transaction off Tuas

SPF says preliminary investigations found that crew members of a Singapore-registered tugboat misappropriated MGO worth about SGD 10,570 without their company’s knowledge and sold it illegally.

Admin

Published

on

By

Singapore police arrest eight over alleged illegal MGO transaction off Tuas

The Singapore Police Force (SPF) on Thursday (13 August) said it has arrested eight men, aged between 25 and 54, for their suspected involvement in an illegal transaction of Marine Gas Oil (MGO).

On 13 August 2026 at about 1.05am, officers from the Police Coast Guard (PCG) conducted a check on a Singapore-registered tugboat in the waters off Tuas and discovered that eight crew members were possibly involved in the illegal transaction of MGO. 

“Preliminary investigations revealed that the crew members of the tugboats misappropriated MGO valued at about SGD 10,570 (USD 8,258), without their company’s knowledge,” SPF said in a statement.

“The MGO was sold illegally for their personal financial gain.”

The eight crew members will be charged in court on 14 August 2026 with the offence of theft by servant of property in possession of master under Section 381 of the Penal Code 1871 If convicted, they shall be punished with an imprisonment term that may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.

“The Police take a serious view of illegal transaction of MGO in Singapore Territorial Waters and will continue to conduct enforcement and security checks to prevent, deter and detect such illicit activities in Singapore waters,” SPF added. 

 

Photo credit: Singapore Police Force
Published: 14 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Port & Regulatory

Gard: Sulphur-related bunker claims rise amid tighter China MSA enforcement

Claims involving excessive sulphur content in marine fuels have been rising, while stricter inspections by the China MSA have heightened the focus on sulphur compliance, particularly in the Bohai Sea.

Admin

Published

on

By

shraga kopstein on Unsplash

Maritime protection and indemnity (P&I) club Gard on Wednesday (12 August) highlighted that claims involving excessive sulphur content in marine fuels have been rising, while stricter inspections by the China MSA have heightened the focus on sulphur compliance, particularly in the Bohai Sea:

Rise in off-spec sulphur claims

Recent claims experience indicates that bunker quality continues to pose a significant operational risk for shipowners. In our earlier review of bunker-related claims during the first five months of 2026, we highlighted a rise in off-specification bunker incidents amid increased pressure on global fuel supply chains following the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. 

Specifically for Sulphur compliance, between January and June 2026, the number of sulphur-related cases increased by more than threefold compared with the same period in 2025. Notably, the number of cases recorded in the first six months of this year has already exceeded the total number reported during the whole of last year by approximately 40%. 

While each case is fact-specific, the increase is notable because excessive sulphur content constitutes a MARPOL compliance issue. Unlike many other bunker quality problems, sulphur non-compliance identified through port state inspections can result in vessel delays, enforcement action, and substantial costs associated with debunkering and fuel disposal. 

The map below illustrates the geographical distribution of sulphur-related claims recorded during the first six months of 2026, based on the location where the bunkers were stemmed.

Distribution of sulphur related claims

China MSA steps up sulphur compliance enforcement

According to our correspondent, Huatai, on 5 June 2026, the maritime authorities of Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning and Shandong jointly launched a special campaign on ship pollution prevention and control in the Bohai Sea region. The campaign involves coordinated supervision by local MSA branches across the region and is expected to last nearly five months. It covers major ports and surrounding port areas in the Bohai Sea region, including Tianjin, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao, Huanghua, Jinzhou, Yingkou and Longkou. 

While the initiative is broader than bunker sulphur compliance alone, its scope includes inspections relating to air pollution prevention, SOx emissions, fuel compliance and other high-pollution-risk operations. Enforcement measures are expected to comprise onboard inspections, cross-regional enforcement activities, unannounced spot checks and remote monitoring. These efforts will be supported by a combination of UAV patrols, maritime patrol vessels, shore-based monitoring systems and rapid on-site fuel testing. 

As a result, vessels trading in the Bohai Sea region may experience increased scrutiny of fuel compliance documentation, fuel sampling records, onboard fuel management procedures, and the handling or disposal of suspected non-compliant fuel.

Documents typically requested by China MSA

Based on our recent experience, including the case discussed above, and subject to the specific requirements of the local MSA office, owners and operators may be requested to provide supporting documentation such as: 

  • Bunker documentation – Bunker Delivery Notes (BDNs), MARPOL fuel sample records, fuel test reports, and relevant fuel quality certificates. 
  • Statutory certificates – including the International Air Pollution Prevention (IAPP) Certificate and International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) Certificate. 
  • Operational records – engine logbooks, deck and navigation logbooks, Oil Record Book entries, and records relating to fuel transfers, storage and consumption. 
  • Sampling documentation – the Master’s statement and any records demonstrating how fuel samples were drawn, sealed, labelled, handled and retained. 
  • Correspondence records – communications with the authorities, bunker suppliers, charterers and other relevant stakeholders. 
  • Fuel disposal records – approved disposal plans, debunkering documentation, receipts and evidence of final disposal, where applicable. 

The exact documentation required will depend on the nature of the investigation, the findings of the inspection, and the requirements of the local enforcement authority. 

Possible regulatory consequences in China

Under the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People’s Republic of China, ocean-going vessels are required to use fuel oil meeting atmospheric pollutant control requirements after berthing. Vessels operating within designated emission control areas must also comply with applicable emission standards. Article 106 provides that where vessel fuel oil fails to meet applicable standards or requirements, the competent maritime authorities may impose fines ranging from RMB 10,000 to RMB 100,000. Liability may extend to shipowners, ship operators and ship managers depending upon the circumstances of the case. 

Recommendation

Sulphur compliance should be treated as both a fuel quality and regulatory risk. Owners and operators are encouraged to take preventive steps before bunkering, act promptly if non-compliant fuel is suspected, and preserve evidence carefully if an inspection or claim arises. Under amended 

Resolution A.1206(34), Appendix 18, 2.1.5, if the BDN shows compliant fuel, but the master has independent test results of the fuel oil sample taken by the ship during the bunkering which indicates non-compliance, the master may document this by notifying the ship’s flag Administration, with copies to: 

  • the competent authority of the relevant port of destination, 
  • the Administration under whose jurisdiction the bunker deliverer is located, 
  • and to the bunker deliverer.

 

Photo credit: shraga kopstein on Unsplash / Gard
Published: 14 August, 2026

Continue Reading

LNG Bunkering

Shell expands LNG bunkering footprint in Spain with Valencia

As one of the region’s key maritime hubs, the company said Valencia expands the options available to shipowners seeking LNG supply along major shipping routes.

Admin

Published

on

By

Shell expands LNG bunkering footprint in Spain with Valencia

British oil giant Shell on Thursday (13 August) said Valencia has joined its growing network of bunkering locations, making LNG available as a marine fuel.

The successful completion of the first LNG bunkering operation in Valencia marked an important milestone for Spain and further strengthened Shell’s LNG supply capabilities across the Mediterranean. 

In a video shared by the company, bunkering vessel Alice Consulich was shown supplying an undisclosed volume of LNG to the container ship MSC Sabrina.

“As one of the region’s key maritime hubs, Valencia expands the options available to shipowners seeking LNG supply along major shipping routes,” Shell said in a social media post. 

Shell said the achievement reflected the strong collaboration across the maritime value chain, including MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company, the Port of Valencia and Fratelli Cosulich Group.

“We look forward to making more LNG bunker deliveries in Valencia and across the Mediterranean as LNG infrastructure and capabilities continue to expand,” the company said. 

 

Photo credit: Shell
Published: 14 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending