The Energy Transitions Commission, a global coalition of leaders from across the energy landscape committed to achieving net-zero emissions, on Thursday (12 November) published a new report that catalogues the barriers to the early adoption of zero-emission technologies throughout the entire energy value chain.
More importantly, the Commission said the report calls to attention to five key actions that first movers can take to make tangible progress towards zero-emission pilots over the next three to four years:
Renewable electricity for the production of green hydrogen represents the largest share of the total pilot cost for the ammonia and methanol fuel pathways that the report explores.
First movers can lower electricity cost at the outset by selecting the right geographical locations for the energy production and by entering into long-term corporate purchase power agreements to secure large volumes of clean power at the lowest costs.
Though first movers will have to contend with higher investment and operational costs, the report shows that this can be mitigated through a green fuel premium, which would help distribute the additional cost throughout the value chain up to the end-consumer.
“Despite the higher business to business costs of operating zero-emission vessels, the impact on end consumer prices is likely to be limited. The increase in the cost of a high-end athletic shoe will represent around 0,5-1% of the total cost,” said Michael Parker, Chairman, Global Shipping, Logistics & Offshore, Citi and Co-Chair of the Getting to Zero Coalition’s Motivating First Movers workstream.
To deploy zero-emission vessels globally, the Commission said new and existing stakeholders will need to work together in creating a new green shipping value chain.
It added that forming consortiums with core value chain actors is another key action first movers can undertake to lower pilot costs.
“Shipping’s decarbonisation cannot be achieved without collaboration. Forming consortiums will allow first movers to cooperate easily, diversify risks across multiple actors, enter into voluntary offtake agreements, and provide robust demand signals,” said Randy Chen, Director and Vice Chairman, Wan Hai Lines and Co-Chair of the Getting to Zero Coalition’s Motivating First Movers workstream.
To lower investment costs, early adopters can also retrofit existing infrastructure, and establish industrial clusters of industrial sectors.
“The economics of zero-emission shipping will depend massively on the cost of zero-emission fuels. Commitments from cargo owners to procure “green shipping” services at a premium price will be crucial to unlock a first wave of commercial scale project,” added Faustine Delasalle, Director, Energy Transitions Commission.
“A combination of tactical corporate decisions reducing fuel costs, enhanced public support to investment, and collaborations across the maritime value chain can also boost the commercial viability of zero-emission shipping for first movers.”
The report emphasizes that governments have to play a decisive role in supporting the shipping industry’s transition to zero-emission. This ranges from direct grants, offering concessional loans to first movers, waiving electricity taxes and grid fees, co-investing in zero-emission pilots, to exploring measures such as a carbon levy.
“Governments have a crucial role in incentivizing and accelerating shipping’s green transition. By supporting first movers, governments can help generate the technology learnings and economies of scale that will allow the market to take over, similarly to the role governments has played within renewable energy technologies such as solar and wind,” added Kasper Søgaard, Head of Research at the Global Maritime Forum, a Partner of the Getting to Zero Coalition.
The first wave of pilots will prove the technological and commercial case for zero-emission shipping, create demand signals for fuel producers and engine manufacturers, set the template for regulatory measures, and provide the foundations of the long-term infrastructure needed for the decarbonization of maritime shipping.
The analysis focuses on green ammonia and green methanol use in pilots involving containerships, but insights will be relevant for other potential zero-emission fuel options.
The full report “The First Wave – A blueprint for commercial-scale zero-emission shipping pilots” is available for download here.
Photo credit: Energy Transitions Commission
Published: 13 November, 2020
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.
‘We [Consort Bunkers] have the opinion that the bunker business in Singapore is not related to the widely reported earlier cargo commodity trading mishaps,’ company source tells Manifold Times.
Representatives of INTERTANKO, Helmsman and Rajah & Tann gather to discuss IMO 2020, legal frameworks for the purchase and supply of alternative marine fuels, and the handling of bunker claims.