The Danish Maritime Authority (DMA) on Friday (22 February) said talks by the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) sub-committee on Pollution Prevention and Response met in London remain “on track”.
“Following up on previous decisions by the IMO concerning the entry into force on 1 January 2020 of the new 0.50 per cent limit of Sulphur content in marine fuels, the Member States provisionally agreed on a number of measures for consistent implementation and enforcement of the new rules,” it notes.
“These measures have now been forwarded to the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee for completion in May this year.”
The measures being finalised this year include guidelines for sampling of fuel oil on board ships and guidelines for consistent implementation including the use of so-called Fuel Oil Non-Availability Reports from ships, notes DMA.
“Such measures along with the adoption in 2018 of a ban prohibiting ships carrying fuel which contains more than 0.50 per cent Sulphur, are aimed at making sure all parties in the shipping community are well prepared to be in compliance with the new rules from 2020 onwards,” it adds.
“At the same meeting, Member States also finalised the methodology for assessing the socioeconomic impacts of a possible ban on carriage and use of Heavy Fuel Oil as fuel in Arctic waters.
“Based on this outcome, Member States will further discuss the impact assessment at the next sub-committee meeting in 2020.”
Photo credit: International Maritime Organization
Published: 27 February, 2019
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.
‘We [Consort Bunkers] have the opinion that the bunker business in Singapore is not related to the widely reported earlier cargo commodity trading mishaps,’ company source tells Manifold Times.