The Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems Association (EGCSA) on Monday issued the following press release to the shipping community:
As the United Nations agency responsible for preventing pollution from shipping and for improving the industry’s safety and security, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) exercises great care when assessing pollution control.
The guidelines for the use of exhaust gas cleaning systems (EGCS), also known as marine scrubbers, have been exhaustively examined and revised three times by the organisation’s sub-committee on Pollution Prevention and Response (PPR).
All administrations during the plenary session of the recent sixth PPR sub-committee meeting again endorsed the use of EGCS as an approved option for complying with the 2020 0.5% global Sulphur target.
The sub-committee reached this conclusion despite concerns expressed by the EU in a paper submitted to MEPC 74 due to a German report alleging a transfer of pollution from air to sea.
Japan meanwhile told PPR6 that it believes the use of heavy fuel oils in combination with a scrubber is a better choice than burning low sulphur fuels. Japan made the point that marine scrubbers are able to remove airborne particulates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) as well as limit sulphur emissions.
The Clean Shipping Alliance 2020 also presented a detailed study of the composition and quality of EGCS washwater, which reaffirmed that EGCS are effective and safe for the ocean environment.
“With emotive coverage fanning the flames of debate over open loop EGCS use, the shipping industry is plagued by uncertainty on how to comply with MARPOL Annex VI regulation 14.1.3. It is therefore still not sure that there will be high levels of compliance,” says Donald Gregory, director of the Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems Association.
“Those owners who have fitted EGCS have invested in compliance. That investment should not be undermined by controversial claims that EGCS are dirty or harmful. The fact is, it is only vessels fitted with EGCS that can confidently assure society they will reduce sulphur emissions below the 0.5% fuel sulphur limit and in most cases even further.
“Focusing the debate on whether one means of compliance or the other is bad, detracts from the key issue – ensuring that the shipping industry as a whole reduces sulphur emissions for the benefit of the environment and human health.
“Aiming to influence regulations this way is unsustainable, damaging to the world economy and undemocratic. It also risks leading to a fragmented approach to compliance, with countries taking different positions on scrubber use; precisely the opposite of what the IMO is meant to achieve.”
Photo credit: International Maritime Organization
Published: 26 February, 2019
Garren Hay will be responsible for sales of the PANOLIN range of Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants for the Singapore sole distributor agent Gealubes Consulting & Trading Pte Ltd.
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.