BIMCO on Monday published two sulphur content related bunker clauses on its website and on SmartCon, the shipping association’s contract editing solution.
The two clauses are:
“The subcommittee’s objective has been to create clauses that are simple and practical, and I’m confident we’ve achieved that objective,” says Peter Eckhardt, chairperson of the drafting committee and Head of Chartering and Operations at Reederei F. Laeisz.
BIMCO 2020 Marine Sulphur Content Clause
The 2020 Marine Fuel Sulphur Content Clause replaces the BIMCO Fuel Sulphur Content Clause 2005 and can be incorporated into time charter parties as of now. The new clause forms an integral part of BIMCO’s Suite of Standard Bunker Clauses for Time Charter Parties.
“By making the 2020 Marine Fuel Sulphur Content Clause part of the Suite of Standard Bunker Clauses, it means that we have been able to keep the revised clause short and simple,” says Grant Hunter, BIMCO head of Contracts & Clauses.
“It is written as a straightforward compliance provision with the sulphur content requirements of MARPOL Annex VI.”
Issues relating to the specifications, grades and quality/suitability of the fuel supplied by time charterers are covered by existing standard bunker clauses in time charters, so these should not need to be amended in relation to sulphur content alone, notes BIMCO.
BIMCO 2020 Fuel Transition Clause
The 2020 Fuel Transition Clause is not part of the Suite of Bunker Clauses as it deals with the one-off event of switching from 3.50% sulphur content fuel to 0.50% sulphur content, it adds.
The switch is a process that will need to be started before 1 January 2020 and so requires the owners and charterers to cooperate to ensure a smooth transition.
The clause is designed to provide a fair allocation of responsibilities and liabilities between the owners and charterers in managing remaining stocks of fuel that will become non-compliant under MARPOL from 1 January 2020.
The clause has been specifically designed for time charter parties that will span 1 January 2020.
“We would also recommend incorporating the clause into time charter parties with redelivery very close to 1 January 2020 where delays or extensions might result in the ship redelivering after the date the change comes into force,” Hunter says.
A joint development
The 2020 Bunker Clauses have been developed by a team comprised of owners, charterers, bunker suppliers, P&I clubs and legal experts.
BIMCO is grateful to the following individuals for their assistance:
Photo credit: BIMCO
Published: 11 December, 2018
Creditor’s meeting will be held via electronic means on Thursday, 10 December at 10:30 am, and all creditors must have submitted proof to be entitled to a vote.
Over charter, vessel damages from use of off-spec marine fuel delivered at Port Louis, Mauritius in July 2018.
The arrest of vessels at the world’s largest bunkering port continues to be an effective method of obtaining recovery on maritime-related claims, says Partner Max Lim.
Parties have reached an amicable settlement at the Tokyo District Court on Tuesday.
Ecospec cSOx scrubber unit did not meet operational requirements; Sembcorp Marine no longer shareholder of Ecospec Marine which is now a dormant company.
South African Maritime Safety Authority obtains letter of guarantee for approx. $359,000 for clean-up costs.
Additional topics of bunker contamination and OCM services discussed at VPS’ Fuel Management Challenges – The Year of 2021 & Beyond webinar on 23 September; Manifold Times summarises the session.
‘The JMs have failed to discharge their duties by blindly helping the Banks mount a false case against the Defendant,’ wrote defence lawyers representing former IPP Director Dr Goh Jian Hian in court statement.
Lead prosecutor Andreas Myllerup Laursen aims for a fine and a prison sentence in the so-called Syria case scheduled to commence in Odense, Denmark on 26 October, writes the Danish publication.
In a modern re-telling of the story of David versus Goliath, local bunker barge owners/charterers successfully resisted claims brought in the Singapore courts by Phillips 66 for misdelivery of bunkers.
Bunker barge owners and operators; traders and suppliers; banks, including players in other countries, will have to re-examine respective operations, advises Helmsman Associate Director Jonathan Tan.
Vopak BL was a non-essential document with no contractual force and had no effect as a contract of carriage or as a document of title, states written Judgement issued by Singapore Court of Appeal.
