John Ollett of global energy and commodity price reporting agency Argus Media on Friday (24 July) published a summary of Seanergy’s Chief Executive Stamatis Tsantanis address at a recent webinar on why scrubbers are no longer an economically viable solution to IMO 2020’s sulphur regulations:
Scrubber fittings are now an uneconomical solution to the global sulphur regulations, Capesize shipowner Seanergy’s chief executive Stamatis Tsantanis told a recent webinar with Noble Capital Markets.
The technicalities of installing the exhaust-filtering systems that allow the continued burn of 3.5% sulphur fuel have proved to be more problematic than initially appeared, Tsantanis said. There are hundreds of new piping connections passing through the engine room and the equipment is very demanding with respect to maintenance, he said.
These complications are exacerbated by Covid-19, because crew-change restrictions make it very difficult to get technicians or engineers on board if any extensive maintenance, repairs or replacement parts are required.
The financials of a scrubber have fundamentally changed, because the spread has narrowed between the 0.5% sulphur fuel that is compliant with the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) rules and the 3.5% sulphur fuel that is not. The spread at the port of Singapore — one of the leading bunkering hubs in the world — was $370.5/t on 1 January but has dropped to just $82.85/t yesterday.
The payback period for a scrubber was anticipated at 6-12 months given a certain spread in fuel prices. That has now been revised upwards towards five years, Tsantanis said.
Seanergy recently completed a scrubber fitting because of a contract that was already in place with a charterer. There are a number of these contracts across the fleet that were negotiated when 0.5% sulphur fuel prices were forecast to be much higher than they are. In these contracts, the shipowner would install the scrubber and then lease the vessel to a charterer for an extended period of time at a set time charter rate, which would allow the charterer to benefit from any fuel cost savings.
Without this contract “I definitely would not be seeking additional scrubber fittings in the future,” said Tsantanis.
Seanergy owns 10 Capesize ships. It has installed scrubbers on five and will use IMO-compliant 0.5% sulphur fuel on the remaining five.
Photo credit and source: Argus Media
Published: 28 July, 2020
‘This biofuel bunker delivery represents a new chapter for Eng Hua as we are now moving with the times towards the era of decarbonisation,’ Mike Sin, Director at Eng Hua, tells bunkering publication Manifold Times.
MPA has also asked Glencore to improve its internal procedures to ensure that prompt action is taken in future when it becomes aware of, or reasonably suspects, any irregularity in fuel quality, it states.
Dynamic Asset Investments Limited and Goldsland Holdings Co Ltd helped Vermont UM Bunkering maintain a “Cash Float” of about SGD 100,000 to facilitate “buyback” bunker transactions at Singapore port.
Senior Cargo Officer gained SGD 48,800 worth of commission from “buyback” bunker transactions and illegally obtained SGD 410,712.257 by cheating Vermont, a Singapore court heard on Thursday (21 July).
Firm hopes to leverage partnership in Greece as a springboard to expand into neighbouring and overseas markets including Europe and China, says Robin Van Elderen, Regional Head Bunkers, Europe, Sing Fuels.
Singapore can help less developed countries in SouthEast Asia through ‘piloting and scaling fuels and technology as well as a leading hub for green finance’, said DNV Group President and CEO Remi Eriksen.