John Ollett of global energy and commodity price reporting agency Argus Media on Friday (24 July) published a summary of Seanergy’s Chief Executive Stamatis Tsantanis address at a recent webinar on why scrubbers are no longer an economically viable solution to IMO 2020’s sulphur regulations:
Scrubber fittings are now an uneconomical solution to the global sulphur regulations, Capesize shipowner Seanergy’s chief executive Stamatis Tsantanis told a recent webinar with Noble Capital Markets.
The technicalities of installing the exhaust-filtering systems that allow the continued burn of 3.5% sulphur fuel have proved to be more problematic than initially appeared, Tsantanis said. There are hundreds of new piping connections passing through the engine room and the equipment is very demanding with respect to maintenance, he said.
These complications are exacerbated by Covid-19, because crew-change restrictions make it very difficult to get technicians or engineers on board if any extensive maintenance, repairs or replacement parts are required.
The financials of a scrubber have fundamentally changed, because the spread has narrowed between the 0.5% sulphur fuel that is compliant with the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) rules and the 3.5% sulphur fuel that is not. The spread at the port of Singapore — one of the leading bunkering hubs in the world — was $370.5/t on 1 January but has dropped to just $82.85/t yesterday.
The payback period for a scrubber was anticipated at 6-12 months given a certain spread in fuel prices. That has now been revised upwards towards five years, Tsantanis said.
Seanergy recently completed a scrubber fitting because of a contract that was already in place with a charterer. There are a number of these contracts across the fleet that were negotiated when 0.5% sulphur fuel prices were forecast to be much higher than they are. In these contracts, the shipowner would install the scrubber and then lease the vessel to a charterer for an extended period of time at a set time charter rate, which would allow the charterer to benefit from any fuel cost savings.
Without this contract “I definitely would not be seeking additional scrubber fittings in the future,” said Tsantanis.
Seanergy owns 10 Capesize ships. It has installed scrubbers on five and will use IMO-compliant 0.5% sulphur fuel on the remaining five.
Photo credit and source: Argus Media
Published: 28 July, 2020
Caroline Yang, President of SSA, addresses issues earlier raised by players; including PMC No. 04, the seven-day restriction, contactless bunkering, sampling point, hose connection, and more.
IBIA Asia, ABIS, sources from Singapore’s bunkering and surveying companies, and an industry veteran share with Manifold Times the issues expected from MPA’s latest Covid-19 measures.
The top three positive movers in the 2020 bunker supplier list are Hong Lam Fuels Pte Ltd (+13); Chevron Singapore Pte Ltd (+12); and SK Energy International (+8), according to MPA list.
‘We will operate in the Singapore bunkering market from the Tokyo, with support from local staff at Sumitomo Corporation Singapore,’ source tells Manifold Times.
Changes include abolishing advance declaration of bunkers as dangerous cargo, reducing pilotage fees on vessels receiving bunkers, and a ‘whitelist’ system for bunker tankers.
Claim relates to deliveries of MGO to the vessels Pacific Diligence, Pacific Valkyrie, Pacific Defiance, Crest Alpha 1, and Pacific Warlock between March 2020 to April 2020.