Global energy and commodity price reporting agency Argus Media on Friday (5 April) published an IMO 2020 market update regarding scrubbers:
A ban on open-loop scrubbers operating in international waters will not happen for at least 22 months, said Frederick Kenney, director for legal affairs and external relations division with the International Maritime Organization (IMO).
IMO is a part of the UN, and as such represents a number of countries. That means the process for a proposal to become a requirement can be a lengthy one.
"A lot of times things get through in IMO not by politics but by process…nothing really happens fast at the IMO", Kenney said at the Connecticut Maritime Association shipping conference in Stamford on Thursday.
EU countries are talking about banning open loop scrubbers in international waters out of pollution concerns. But no proposals have been put forward to the IMO's Marine Environment Protection Committee. If a proposal is submitted, then the process to review it would take nearly two years.
"You have a minimum of 22 months before anything can enter into force," Kenney said.
The IMO's process quirks are evident in the date it set for a ban on vessels carrying high-sulphur residual fuel oil in their bunkering tanks. That ban begins on 1 March, two months after the IMO will have dropped its global marine fuel sulphur standard from 3.5pc to 0.5pc.
IMO did not mean to give shipowners a grace period to comply with the IMO 2020 rule that starts 1 January. Its just that the March date was the earliest the IMO allowed, Kenney said.
Open-loop scrubbers use seawater to capture sulphur from engine exhausts before discharging this wash water back into the ocean. Some countries have decided to ban open loop scrubbers in their territorial waters. These include Singapore, Latvia, Lithuania, Belgium, Dublin in Ireland, Fujairah and Abu Dhabi in the UAE, India and China. In the US, Connecticut, Massachusetts, California and Hawaii ban their use.
Source: Argus Media
Published: 8 April
Additional topics of bunker contamination and OCM services discussed at VPS’ Fuel Management Challenges – The Year of 2021 & Beyond webinar on 23 September; Manifold Times summarises the session.
‘The JMs have failed to discharge their duties by blindly helping the Banks mount a false case against the Defendant,’ wrote defence lawyers representing former IPP Director Dr Goh Jian Hian in court statement.
Lead prosecutor Andreas Myllerup Laursen aims for a fine and a prison sentence in the so-called Syria case scheduled to commence in Odense, Denmark on 26 October, writes the Danish publication.
In a modern re-telling of the story of David versus Goliath, local bunker barge owners/charterers successfully resisted claims brought in the Singapore courts by Phillips 66 for misdelivery of bunkers.
Bunker barge owners and operators; traders and suppliers; banks, including players in other countries, will have to re-examine respective operations, advises Helmsman Associate Director Jonathan Tan.
Vopak BL was a non-essential document with no contractual force and had no effect as a contract of carriage or as a document of title, states written Judgement issued by Singapore Court of Appeal.