The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) working group has scheduled a meeting (9-13 July) to develop guidelines to support the consistent implementation of the 0.50% limit for the sulphur content in fuel oil used on board ships from 1 January 2020.
The intersessional meeting, under the auspices of the Sub-Committee on Pollution Prevention and Response (PPR), will work on developing some “very detailed” guidelines to support consistent implementation of the 0.50% limit, it says.
This will include guidance on preparatory and transitional issues, including guidance on ship implementation planning for 2020; impact on fuel and machinery systems resulting from new fuel blends or fuel types; verification issues and control mechanism and actions, including port State control and in-use fuel oil samples; a standard reporting format for fuel oil non-availability; and safety implications relating to the option of blending fuels.
Additionally, the meeting will consider proposals for amendments to MARPOL Annex VI to provide a unified verification procedure and test method for fuel oil used by ships, including the provision of a regulatory definition of “sulphur content”, the verification procedure to be used when testing fuel oil used by ships and the standard for testing the fuel oil.
IMO's Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 72) in April instructed the intersessional meeting to report directly to MEPC 73 in October this year, on the development of the guidance on ship implementation planning for 2020.
MEPC 73 is expected to approve this guidance and issue it, in order to provide industry with over a year to apply it before the entry into effect of the 2020 limit.
Related: BIMCO submits draft for vessels unable to get compliant fuel
Related: BIMCO suggests sulphur implementation plan for ships
Related: BIMCO proposes changes in sulphur sampling points
Photo credit: International Maritime Organisation
Published: 10 July, 2018
Early experiences suggest the shipping industry has adapted well to the switch to VLSFO, but the huge variability in their characteristics has brought issues, it said.
‘The reality is that the industry has already passed the date beyond the smooth transition,’ it says.
Clean Shipping Alliance 2020 welcomes decision noting scrubbers are ‘best way’ of reducing shipping emissions.
‘We haven't yet gotten to the point where we feel that's a good use of capital for Scorpio Bulkers,’ says COO.
‘It is very sad to hear there still are issues but it’s definitely not something which is being reported [to CIMAC and ISO],’ says MAN Energy Solutions spokesman at webinar.
Cefore Post-IMO 2020 experiences technical memo highlights tank cleaning, filtering, lube oil, viscosity and stability issues of ‘new’ bunker fuels.
Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.
Cost of alternative bunker fuels, bunker operations and technology advancement are some considerations to be examined by the maritime industry, says Neo, director of SDE International Pte Ltd.
Kim Hyung Joon and Han Donghoon were planning to join the Singapore entities of Hartree Group - either Hartree Partners Singapore Pte Ltd or Hartree Marine Fuels - in October, discovered management.
‘When you think of Helmsman on the next occasion, think of us as lawyers with expertise in various fields. Come to us before a problem develops. It’s the process that matters,’ says Tang Chong Jun, Executive Director.
Bernard Chew was a former shareholder of MB Marine and was an authorised signatory of the company’s cheques at the material time, according to court documents obtained by Manifold Times.
Maersk, CMA CGM, BP and Stena Bulk give insights on availability of the three potential bunker fuel types, their plans, transition from fuel oil and LNG to alt fuels, how important sustainable marine fuels are to shipowners and more.
