With the first FuelEU Maritime compliance data emerging after the inaugural year of greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity reporting for ships trading in the EU, marine insurer Skuld spoke with Joe Bettles, Climate Policy Manager and author of the Countdown newsletter at the Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping, to examine what the early results reveal: 

The first data on FuelEU Maritime compliance is now emerging, following the first year of reporting against greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity targets for shipping companies trading in the EU.

To better understand what the early results show, we spoke with Joe Bettles, Climate Policy Manager and author of the Countdown newsletter at the Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping (Center). The Center recently published its analysis of the first reporting year in the article “What did we learn from the first year of FuelEU?”

Under the regulation, shipowners have several options for compliance, including:

• The pooling mechanism, which allows vessels with a compliance surplus to trade it with other vessels.
• The borrowing mechanism, which allows companies to defer a compliance deficit to the following year for a 10% surcharge.
• Meet the target by using low GHG intensity fuels.
• Pay the FuelEU penalty (penalty).

Pooling becomes the preferred option

The first year of reporting indicates that pooling has quickly become the preferred choice. According to data from the European Commission, 92% of vessels used the pooling mechanism, while only 2% used borrowing. The remaining vessels either paid the penalty or met the target by using LNG or other low-GHG energy sources.

Commenting on the findings, Joe Bettles says: “Our insights from the first year of reporting indicate that shipping companies were able to comply with the targets, with most using the pooling mechanism. This shows that FuelEU is working as intended. As we approach the IMO’s upcoming discussion on the Net-Zero Framework (NZF), FuelEU demonstrates that it is possible for the global fleet to comply with a GHG intensity regulation using existing fuels and providing incentives for the uptake of cleaner energy sources.”

A developing market for compliance surplus

The Center’s article also reviews the different pooling platforms available to shipping companies seeking to meet their obligations under the regulation. The price of compliance surplus, averaging around EUR 208/tCO₂eq, remained relatively stable, suggesting that the market matured early, with buyers generally able to find sellers.

On the development of the pooling market, Joe notes: “The prices for trading compliance surpluses remained well below the EUR 640/tCO₂eq penalty for VLSFO, making the pooling mechanism significantly more attractive than paying the penalty.”

Fuel choices remain central to compliance

The role of fuel choice is also important. Looking at fuels supplied to the FuelEU market, the Center estimates that 3.22 million tCO₂eq of reductions, relative to an all-VLSFO fleet, will be required to meet the 2% reduction target between 2025 and 2029. Based on analysis of previous years’ fuel consumption, the Center indicates that LNG may have contributed around one-third of the required reduction. Biofuel blends account for the remainder, with biodiesel and bio-LNG dominating the low-GHG fuel mix.

Joe highlights how the pooling mechanism can help extend the impact of lower-GHG fuels across the fleet: “Although LNG is not a drop-in replacement for VLSFO, the pooling mechanism under FuelEU allows an LNG-fuelled vessel to share its over-compliance with other vessels that cannot physically use LNG. Depending on the engine type in the ship, LNG can remain compliant with the 14.5% reduction target through 2039 and can further extend its compliance through banked surplus or by using liquified biomethane.”

Three early lessons from FuelEU Maritime

Drawing on the first year of reporting, Joe Bettles and the Center identify three lessons that may also be relevant for the IMO in the future.

First, the results indicate that a fuel standard for shipping can work. FuelEU’s first year has created incentives for the use of alternative fuels and a market for those who prefer to pay for emissions compliance.

Second, regulations should include mechanisms that support a broader mix of energy sources. Lower-maturity alternatives, such as wind-assisted propulsion, e-fuels and onshore power, still represented a limited share of the mix.

Third, policy stability and clear reduction pathways can help reduce uncertainty for shipping companies and support the business case for investment in cleaner alternatives.

Supporting knowledge sharing across the maritime value chain

Skuld is a Mission Ambassador to the Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping, supporting its work as a platform for collaboration, knowledge sharing and practical insight across the maritime value chain.

“The Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping is a highly valuable forum for us at Skuld. It provides access to a broad network of industry stakeholders and helps us stay close to the challenges shipowners face in meeting regulatory requirements and reducing emissions. Just as importantly, it serves as a platform for dialogue and knowledge sharing across the maritime value chain” – Matias Bøe Olsen, Decarbonisation and transition risk lead, Skuld.

Note: Read the full article on FuelEU’s first-year experiences here.

Photo credit: Chris Pagan on Unsplash
Published: 7 August, 2026

Caroline Yang, CEO of Hong Lam Marine Pte Ltd, outlines her plans for IBIA Asia in her first interview with Manifold Times since becoming Chair of the Regional Board – Asia:

MT: Why is IBIA important to the bunkering market in Asia?

IBIA Asia is amongst five regional boards operating under the umbrella of London-based IBIA Global. Its presence in Asia is vital because the region, excluding the Middle East, accounts for more than 50% of global bunkering volume.

While Singapore continues to maintain its strong lead as the world’s busiest bunkering port with almost 56 million mt of marine fuel delivered in 2025, several ports in China are showing to be strong bunkering ports as well; these developments take place on the back of a forecast for China to be amongst the leading suppliers of green fuels such as methanol.

Based on this alone, IBIA Asia has to play an important role in raising and addressing issues of suppliers and shipowners and the other parties in the regional bunkering eco-system.

MT: What is the overall state of bunkering standards at major Asian ports and how can IBIA elevate this?

Singapore is the clear leader in standards, acting as a “flag bearer” with established protocols including SS 600 for bunkering, SS 648 for bunker mass flow metering, SS 524 for quality management of bunker supply chain, TR 56 for LNG bunkering, and TR 80 for meter verification using master MFM.

While other Asian ports are adopting mass flow meters – a positive step – IBIA Asia’s role is to disseminate these best practices while maintaining deep respect for local operational realities and regulatory environments.

MT: As Chair of the Regional Board – Asia, what are your plans to make this happen? Are there any topics you will be focusing on?

The IBIA Asia regional board of 10 members from comes from a diverse group of suppliers, shipowners, bunker buyers, fuels testers and bunker tanker owners. Backed by a strong secretariat, we are committed to move the needle for bunkering in Asia.

Our initial strategy is outreach-driven, progressing beyond a Singapore-centric approach. For starters, the board will be concentrating on Hong Kong, Zhoushan, and Shanghai, with potential expansion to Japan and South Korea.

The core objective is to promote the quality, transparency, and integrity of bunkers lifted in Asia. This includes building on existing MOUs such as the collaboration with Hong Kong Shipowners Association (HKSOA) to explore alternative bunker fuels, and participation in regional maritime week programmes.

MT: Do you expect to encounter any challenges? What do you think are the solutions?

Challenges, without a doubt; these include macro-level standards and topical quality issues, such as those highlighted in a recent FOBAS report.

We are aware most solutions will not have instant results, but produce short-term, mid-term and long-term responses.

The solution lies in structured communication and feedback loops involving industry, regulators, and experts. Success requires an altruistic approach where stakeholders prioritise the health of the bunkering ecosystem to achieve win-win outcomes, even at the compromise of individual sectors.

MT: Is participation of local/regional IBIA members included within your plan? How will they be involved?

Member participation is the foundation of an association’s strength. The plan involves active outreach – meeting members where they operate and integrating them into meetings to ensure the board’s positions reflect representative industry views. We must push out credible, strong messages to encourage active engagement. If there is anyone in the maritime bunkering in these areas and reading this interview, reach out to us so we can start our conversations!

The Secretariat and some board members have scheduled to visit and attend bunkering events in Hong Kong and China. In November 2026, IBIA will participate in the Hong Kong Maritime Week by organising a one-day conference. We hope to be also participating in the Shanghai Pudong Maritime Conference and the 9th International Petroleum and Natural Gas Enterprises Conference (IPEC 2026), also known as the “Zhoushan Bunker Oil conference”, in late October.

MT: How will previous experience gained at SSA, ICS, MPA, SMF, and Hong Lam Marine contribute to your role at IBIA?

As CEO of Hong Lam Marine, our bunker tankers supply about 10% of bunkering volume in Singapore, so we are an involved and relevant stakeholder. My experiences in the above-mentioned organisations have taught me how to crystallise and articulate important issues, engage effectively with diverse stakeholders, and leverage on pre-existing professional connections to engage more effectively for IBIA Asia.

Related: IBIA announces Caroline Yang as new Regional Board Chair for Asia
Related: IBIA and Hong Kong Shipowners Association to collaborate on alternative bunker fuels
Related: FOBAS report warns of growing operational risks from ISO-compliant bunker fuels

Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 6 August 2026

State-owned Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) recently launched an international tender for the construction of up to six LNG dual-fuel container vessels as part of its fleet renewal programme.

The tender covers two firm orders with options for four additional vessels. Each ship will have a capacity of approximately 8,000 TEU and be capable of operating on LNG as well as conventional marine fuels.

Both Indian and foreign shipyards are eligible to bid, subject to SCI’s technical and financial requirements. 

Foreign yards must have delivered at least two container vessels exceeding 5,000 TEU that have entered service within the past 10 years. Indian shipyards without prior containership construction experience must partner with a reputed foreign yard that has previously built LNG dual-fuel vessels, capable of running on LNG and Conventional fuel which are in service.

According to the tender documents, SCI will evaluate bids based on factors including delivery and payment schedule of the vessel, bunker fuel consumption, service speed and cargo-carrying capacity.

Bids for the tender must be submitted by 31 August at 1700 hours IST and a virtual pre-bid meeting will be held on 18 August at 1500 hours. 

Photo credit: Naveed Ahmed on Unsplash
Published: 6 August, 2026