New York-listed World Fuel Services (WFS) expects its marine fuels business to produce better returns in the long term due to current reduction activities.
“As we look to the first quarter [of 2018] for marine, we expect gross profit to be relatively flat, but sequential marine result should improve driven principally by the benefit of additional cost reduction activities,” says Ira Birns, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WFS, in a recent financial earnings conference call.
WFS’ marine segment generated fourth quarter gross profit of $29 million in 2017, down $6 million or 16% year-over-year; volume in the similar segment was 6.1 million metric tonnes, down approximately 1.5 million metric tons or 20% year-over-year.
“The largest drivers of the volume reduction relate to our operations in the Asia-Pac region and our decision to exit certain markets we have seen continued market pressure and weakness as well as our continuous efforts to reduce activity in regions where we have not been achieving satisfactory returns on capital,” Birns adds.
Michael Kasbar, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WFS, believes the company’s marine segment will produce better results in the longer term.
“Our right sized marine business should yield better returns and it's poised in the longer term to capitalise on the continuing need in the market for a comprehensive service and distribution partner,” he notes.
“We are well positioned to provide any solution for 2020 when low sulphur regulations commence.”
Moving ahead, Kasbar indicates that WFS may be exploring to enter the physical bunker supply business.
“I don't know if we have more of the markets to exist. We are being mindful of returns,” he said when responding to a query of marine volumes in the first quarter of 2018.
“So there has been some changes that is not a surprise to folks that have been following the marine business. So, we are looking as I said to model or physical business.”
Manifold Times earlier reported WFS posting net loss of $142 million in 2017 due to “challenging market conditions” in the marine and land segments.
Related: WFS posts net loss of $142.0 million in 2017
Published: 26 February, 2018
Some bunker suppliers at various ports have even achieved their sales target for the year; the trend doesn't seem to be slowing down and suppliers are expecting a boom during end of September.
Main concerns of Singapore players include formalisation between role of bunker surveyors and cargo officers, and bottleneck on bunker tanker crew changes amidst COVID-19.
USD 1.15 million, or 1.8 million litres, of diesel cargo disappeared from the oil tanker while on the way from Singapore to Dili, East Timor on 5 October.
Low Sulphur Surcharge no longer relevant with effect from 1 May, 2020 due to current price of VLSFO, states CMA CGM; however charges may still revert at a later date.
Current auditor cannot travel to PRC to perform any audit procedures on the outstanding financial results, it states.
High Court has set 25 June 2021 as the hearing date for the winding-up application; Wong Joo Wan of Alternative Advisors is appointed liquidator.
Program introduces periodic assessments, mass flow metering data analysis, and regular training for relevant key personnel to better handle the MFMS to ensure a high level of continuous operational competency.
U.S. Claims Register Summary recorded a total USD 833 million claim from a total 180 creditors against O.W. Bunker USA, according to the creditor list seen by Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times.
Glencore purchased fuel through Straits Pinnacle which contracted supply from Unicious Energy. Contaminated HSFO was loaded at Khor Fakkan port and shipped to a FSU in Tanjong Pelepas, Malaysia to be further blended.
Individuals were employees of surveying companies engaged by Shell to inspect the volume of oil loaded onto the vessels which Shell supplied oil to; they allegedly accepted bribes totalling at least USD 213,000.
MPA preliminary investigations revealed that the affected marine fuel was supplied by Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd who later sold part of the same cargo to PetroChina International (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
‘MPA had immediately contacted the relevant bunker suppliers to take necessary steps to ensure that the relevant batch of fuel was no longer supplied. Further investigations are currently on-going,’ it informs.
