Connect with us

Legal

US sues owner, operator of Singapore-registered “Dali” for Baltimore bridge crash

Justice Department filed a civil claim against Singaporean firms Grace Ocean and Synergy Marine to recover over USD 100 million in costs the US incurred in responding to fatal disaster.

Admin

Published

on

Singapore-registered “Dali” crashing into Baltimore bridge

The Justice Department filed a civil claim on Wednesday (18 September) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland against Grace Ocean Private Limited and Synergy Marine Private Limited, the Singaporean corporations that owned and operated the container ship that destroyed the Francis Scott Key Bridge.

In the early morning hours of March 26, the Motor Vessel DALI left the Port of Baltimore bound for Sri Lanka. While navigating through the Fort McHenry Channel, the vessel lost power, regained power, and then lost power again before striking the bridge. 

The bridge collapsed and plunged into the water below, tragically killing six people. In addition to this heartbreaking loss of life, the wreck of the Dali and the remnants of the bridge obstructed the navigable channel and brought all shipping into and out of the Port of Baltimore to a standstill. The loss of the bridge also severed a critical highway in our transportation infrastructure and a key artery for local commuters.

The suit seeks to recover over USD 100 million in costs the United States incurred in responding to the fatal disaster and for clearing the entangled wreck and bridge debris from the navigable channel so the port could reopen.

“The Justice Department is committed to ensuring accountability for those responsible for the destruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, which resulted in the tragic deaths of six people and disrupted our country’s transportation and defense infrastructure,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. 

“With this civil claim, the Justice Department is working to ensure that the costs of clearing the channel and reopening the Port of Baltimore are borne by the companies that caused the crash, not by the American taxpayer.”

The United States led the response efforts of dozens of federal, state, and local agencies to remove about 50,000 tons of steel, concrete, and asphalt from the channel and from the Dali itself. While these removal operations were underway, the claim alleges that the United States also cleared a series of temporary channels to start relieving the bottleneck at the port and mitigate some of the economic devastation caused by the Dali

The Fort McHenry Channel was cleared by June 10, and the Port of Baltimore was once again open for commercial navigation.

“The owner and operator of the Dali were well aware of vibration issues on the vessel that could cause a power outage. But instead of taking necessary precautions, they did the opposite,” said Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer. “

Out of negligence, mismanagement, and, at times, a desire to cut costs, they configured the ship’s electrical and mechanical systems in a way that prevented those systems from being able to quickly restore propulsion and steering after a power outage. As a result, when the Dali lost power, a cascading set of failures led to disaster.”

Indeed, the lawsuit specifically asserts that none of the four means that should have been available to help steer the Dali — the propeller, rudder, anchor, or bow thruster — worked when they were needed to avert or even mitigate this disaster.

“This was an entirely avoidable catastrophe, resulting from a series of eminently foreseeable errors made by the owner and operator of the DALI,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “The suit seeks to recover the costs incurred by the United States in responding to this disaster, which include removing the bridge parts from the channel and those parts that were entangled with the vessel, as well as abating the substantial risk of oil pollution.”

“In so many ways, the Key Bridge has symbolized the resilience of both the State of Maryland and our Nation. In a very real way, the Key Bridge was a pathway to the American Dream. A part of our culture is gone,” said U.S. Attorney Erek L. Barron for the District of Maryland. “Those responsible for the Key Bridge collapse will be held accountable.” 

The Justice Department’s claim also seeks punitive damages to deter the owner and operator of the DALI and others. 

During a press call announcing the Justice Department’s actions, Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General Chetan Patil of the Civil Division explained, “This accident happened because of the careless and grossly negligent decisions made by Grace Ocean and Synergy, who recklessly chose to send an unseaworthy vessel to navigate a critical waterway and ignored the risks to American lives and the nation’s infrastructure.”

The Department’s claim is part of a legal action the owner and operator of the Dali initiated shortly after the tragedy, in which they seek exoneration or limitation of their liability to approximately USD 44 million.  

The claim on behalf of the United States does not include any damages for the reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The State of Maryland built, owned, maintained, and operated the bridge, and attorneys on the State’s behalf may file their own claim for those damages. Subsequently, pursuant to the governing regulation, funds recovered by the State of Maryland for reconstruction of the bridge will be used to reduce the project costs paid by federal taxpayer dollars.

The claims alleged by the United States are allegations only. There has been no determination of liability.

Related: NTSB report dismisses bunker fuel as cause of Singapore-registered “Dali” crashing into Baltimore bridge
Related: Baltimore bridge crash: Safety investigation to include contaminated bunker fuel as possible cause
Related: Baltimore bridge collapse: FuelTrust highlights bunkering activities of Singapore-registered “Dali”
Related: MPA: Singapore-registered ship in Baltimore bridge crash passed previous foreign port state inspections

Photo credit: National Transportation Safety Board
Published: 20 September, 2024

Continue Reading

Winding up

Singapore: Creditors’ meeting scheduled for Quetzal Offshore Pte Ltd

Meeting for Quetzal Offshore will be held through electronic means on 27 May at 3pm to confirm the appointment of liquidators, according to Government Gazette notice.

Admin

Published

on

By

Resized benjamin child

The creditors’ meeting of Quetzal Offshore Pte Ltd Pte Ltd, has been scheduled to take place on 27 May, states a Monday (19 May) notice posted on the Government Gazette. 

The meeting for creditors of the company will be held by way of electronic means at 3pm. 

The purposes of the meeting are:

  • receiving a statement of the Company’s affairs together with a list of creditors and the estimated amounts of their claims;
  • confirming the appointment of Mr. Chan Kwong Shing, Adrian, Ms. Toh Ai Ling and Ms. Tan Yen Chiaw all care of KPMG Services Pte. Ltd. of 12 Marina View, #15-01 Asia Square Tower 2, Singapore 018961, as the joint and several Liquidators of the Company pursuant to Section 167(1) of the Act for the purpose of winding up the affairs of the Company at such remuneration based on time costs;
  • resolving that the Liquidators be at liberty to open, maintain and operate any bank account(s) or account(s) for monies received by them as Liquidators with such bank(s) as they deem fit;
  • forming a Committee of Inspection of not more than 5 members, if thought fit; 
  • and any other business

According to SGP Business website, a business platform for businesses and individuals, the company’s main business was offering ship management services. 

 

Photo credit: Benjamin-child
Published: 21 May, 2025

Continue Reading

Sanctions

UK cracks down on Russian shadow fleet with fresh sanctions

Latest sanctions target 18 more ships in the ‘shadow fleet’ carrying Russians oil; John Michael Ormerod, a British national, also faced sanction for procuring ships for Russia’s shadow fleet.

Admin

Published

on

By

balesstudio on Unsplash

The UK on Tuesday (20 May) announced a raft of 100 sanctions targeting Russian military, energy, financial sectors and those conducting Putin’s information war against Ukraine.

The latest sanctions target 18 more ships in the ‘shadow fleet’ carrying Russians oil, along with the fleet’s enablers. The Prime Minister announced 110 shadow fleet related sanctions ahead of his visit to Kyiv earlier this month.  

John Michael Ormerod, a British national, also faced sanction for procuring ships for Russia’s shadow fleet. Two Russian captains of shadow fleet tankers were also named in the list of individuals who were sanctioned. 

“This action imposes a personal cost on those who are supporting Russia’s trade in oil and is another step in the Foreign Secretary’s personal mission to constrain the Kremlin and a crucial part of the Plan for Change to ensure a secure Britain,” the government said in a statement. 

The UK is also working with partners to tighten the Oil Price Cap that limits the price that Russia can charge for its oil if transported using G7 services like insurance and shipping. 

“We are reviewing the $60 crude price level, with a view to lowering the cap closer to the cost of production and hitting Putin where it hurts by striking at his oil revenues,” it added.

The following is the list of sanctioned 18 ships:

  • TORONTO (IMO 8808525)  
  • NEXT (IMO 9286023) 
  • SPRING FORTUNE (IMO 9386536)  
  • RAGNAR (IMO 9384095)  
  • FURIA (IMO 9257802) 
  • CORTEX (IMO 9291250)  
  • CETUS (IMO 9418482)  
  • MISSONI (IMO 9296810) 
  • OTLA (IMO 9299719)  
  • MAIN (IMO 9387255) 
  • NAUTILUS (IMO 9434890) 
  • ARABELA (IMO 9253313)  
  • RICCA (IMO 9292577)  
  • TEAM (IMO 9292589) 
  • LEOPARD (IMO 9284594) 
  • PIERRE (IMO 9266877) 
  • JAMES II (IMO 9253909) 
  • LIETO (9389679) 

 

Photo credit: balesstudio on Unsplash
Published: 21 May, 2025

Continue Reading

Business

Indonesia seeks cooperation of Singapore traders in USD 12 billion Pertamina probe

Oil traders received notices, requesting them to assist the office of Indonesia’s Attorney General by providing answers on overall governance and past transactions, reports Bloomberg.

Admin

Published

on

By

Pertamina

Singapore-based trading companies have been reached out by Indonesia authorities to seek their cooperation in a USD 12 billion (SGD 15.5 billion) corruption investigation involving state-owned oil giant PT Pertamina, reports Bloomberg.

According to several people who received or saw the invitation, who wished to remain anonymous, the oil traders received notices earlier this month, requesting them to assist the office of Indonesia’s Attorney General by providing answers on overall governance and past transactions. 

The missive, sent from a Pertamina email address, detailed that the interviews would be conducted at Singapore’s Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), without confirming dates. 

The Attorney General office reportedly confirmed several Singapore-based companies had been summoned, but said no interviews have been conducted yet. 

In February, it was reported that Indonesia’s Attorney General’s Office arrested three executives at units of state-owned oil and gas giant Pertamina in connection with a IDR 193.7 trillion (USD 12 billion) crude oil corruption scandal.

Since then, Indonesia’s local media has reported more executives including Nicke Widyawati, the company’s former chief executive, have been questioned by the office of Attorney General. 

According to the Bloomberg report, Indonesia is dependent on energy imports, and Singapore-based companies are regular participants in Pertamina’s tenders for the purchase of petrol and crude oil. 

Recently, there have been reports of Indonesia planning to cut fuel imports from Singapore and is eyeing supplies from the US and the Middle East instead. 

Indonesia’s Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Bahlil Lahadalia stated that Indonesia could shift as much as 60% of its total fuel imports from Singapore to the United States in the early stages. He was quoted as saying Indonesia aimed to progressively reduce imports from Singapore to zero “some day”.

 

Photo credit: Pertamina
Published: 20 May, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending