Connect with us

Analysis

The Standard Club: Off-specification bunkers, Houston area

Issues with contaminated bunker supplies at Houston continue and have begun to spread worldwide.

Admin

Published

on

5b7f61205f0b7 1535074592

The Standard Club, a specialist marine and energy insurer, Thursday issued a web alert updating shipowners about contaminated bunker fuels:

Widespread issue
The issues with contaminated bunker supplies in the Houston area earlier this year continue and have begun to spread worldwide.

At present, the source and magnitude of the contaminated bunkers has not been satisfactorily identified and the number of cases is still increasing. The club is presently dealing with a number of cases, but the issue is reported to be impacting over 150 cases worldwide, with varying levels of severity. One grounding so far has been a direct result from the use of these contaminated bunkers.

The contaminants
The main contaminants are phenol and styrene which cannot be identified from standard tests on the bunker sample under ISO 8217, with samples being confirmed as 'in specification' despite phenols and styrene contaminants being present. Multidimensional Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) testing is required to identify and quantify these types of contaminants, but has to be requested as an additional set of tests.

The nature of these particular contaminants leads to very sticky, waxy like deposits which have actually resulted in main and auxiliary engines’ fuel pumps seizing, in addition to blocked heaters, purifiers, filters and excessive sludge build up.

Testing
GCMS is not a standard testing procedure, and there are only a few laboratories with the necessary equipment/facilities to conduct these tests. This also includes those of the larger fuel oil testing laboratories. 

Normal testing period for GCMS ranges from 5 to 15 days depending on the type of contaminant present as well as the type of tests carried out, as GCMS testing is currently not uniform amongst the various fuel oil testing laboratories. Unfortunately from our research so far, the larger (well known) fuel testing companies in the Houston area have been overwhelmed with sample testing requests resulting in delays of up to 4 to 5 weeks for GCMS, although this period can be reduced to 10 to 15 days when using laboratories in Singapore and the Middle East, due to current low demand. 

Based on information received, the additional costs involved for GCMS testing are considerable, in excess of $1,000 per sample. 

Due to this prolonged period awaiting GCMS analysis results, the opportunity to raise a claim for bunker quality issues could be lost as a result of the time bar on such disputes which usually ranges between 2 to 4 weeks after delivery. Members should familiarise themselves with these time bar periods and take all possible steps to address quality issues under the applicable contract. However, when quality issues are identified outside these time bars there may still be alternative ways to tackle these problems and members are encouraged to contact the club to discuss their options. 

Loss prevention advice
Considering the potential limitations/restrictions presently existing in respect to GCMS testing, it is strongly recommended that members be proactive and implement best practices in line with the following procedures, to limit their exposure to receiving and subsequently consuming contaminated bunkers. 

  • Contact the manufacturers of your engines and purifiers and request advice on what limitations exist concerning fuel quality for safe, normal operation of their equipment. 
  • Ensure good bunker management is in place across the fleet. 
  • Only use known, reputable suppliers and insist that charterers do the same (understood this may be difficult depending on terms & conditions of charter party). 
  • Check historical records of bunker suppliers with fuel testing laboratories and identify any previous quality issues. 
  • Samples should be sent for laboratory analysis immediately upon completion of bunkering operations. 
  • Ensure bunkers are segregated with no comingling taking place during loading.
  • Do not consume new bunkers until the analysis report has been received

Contaminated bunkers received onboard?
If contaminated bunkers are identified as having been delivered onboard, it is essential that a proactive approach is taken to minimising their effects wherever possible. Owners and charterers need to cooperate to find the most practical resolution to the issue. 

  1. If possible, bunkers should be chemically treated (if possible) to bring them back within specification, by the use of additives.
  2. Both owners and charterers will need to ensure that there is alternative fuel supply available onboard to consume during the interim period whilst looking for the best option to remove/offload the affected bunkers ashore.
  3. Consideration should be given to ensure that adequate cleaning is undertaken of any tanks or pipelines that held the contaminated bunkers prior to discharge to ensure that there is no cross-contamination of future stemmed bunkers.

Conclusion
As mentioned previously, close liaison with the club is vital to assist in exploring different options open to the member under such circumstances.

Source: The Standard Club
Published: 24 August, 2018

 

Continue Reading

Analysis

JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (October 2024)

China’s bonded bunker fuel sales plunged in October, due to lingering tightness of LSFO supply and the bad weather at certain ports.

Admin

Published

on

By

Bonded bunker fuel sales in Zhoushan JLC Nov 2024

Beijing-based commodity market information provider JLC Network Technology Co. recently shared its JLC China Bunker monthly report for October 2024 with Manifold Times through an exclusive arrangement:

China’s bonded bunker fuel sales plunge in October

China’s bonded bunker fuel sales plunged in October, due to lingering tightness of LSFO supply and the bad weather at certain ports.

The country sold about 1.45 million mt of bonded bunker fuel in the month, which was the lowest level since February 2022, JLC’s data shows. The daily sales settled at 46,881 mt in October, tumbling by 15.28% month on month.

Bonded bunker fuel sales by Chimbusco, Sinopec (Zhoushan), SinoBunker and China Changjiang Bunker (Sinopec) stood at 410,000 mt, 530,000 mt, 40,000 mt and 25,000 mt in the month, while those by suppliers with regional bunkering licenses settled at 448,300 mt, the data indicates.

China’s bonded bunker exports surge in September, but sales decline

China’s bonded bunker fuel exports surged in September, because of brisker re-export trade, but its actual sales declined amid tighter domestic supply.

The country exported about 2.18 million mt of bonded bunker fuel in the month, with the daily exports at 72,790 mt, up by 45.60% month on month and 37.82% year on year, JLC estimated, with reference to data from the General Administration of Customs of PRC (GACC).

Specifically, heavy bunker fuel exports totalled 1.90 million mt, accounting for 87.19% of the country’s total, while light bunker fuel exports increased to 279,800 mt, accounting for 12.81%.

Though bonded bunker fuel exports jumped amid more re-export trade activities, the actual sales descended as domestic refiners cut their LSFO production and port operation in East China was dampened by typhoons.

Chinese refiners produced about 993,000 mt of LSFO in the month, with the daily output at 33,100 mt, a slump of 11.16% from August and 15.13% from a year earlier, JLC’s data shows.

China issued this year’s third batch of quotas on LSFO exports in September, which was also expected to be the last batch for 2024, permitting only 1.0 million mt of exports, bringing this year’s total quotas to 13 million mt, down from 13.17 million for 2023 (the country issued quotas on 14 million mt for 2023, but some quotas were later converted to clean oil products).

China’s bonded bunker fuel exports totalled 15.09 million mt in the first nine months of this year, with the daily exports at 55,078 mt, sliding by 1.36% from the same period of time in 2023. Heavy bunker fuel exports came in at 14.08 million mt in January-September, accounting for 93.28%, while light bunker fuel exports stood at 1.01 million mt, making up 6.72%.

China bunker exports by region, 2023 2024 JLC Nov 2024

China major blending producers' bunker supply, Oct 2024 JLC Nov 2024

Domestic-trade heavy bunker fuel demand shrinks in October

Domestic-trade heavy bunker fuel demand shrank in October, because of multiple factors.

Domestic-trade heavy bunker fuel demand settled at 360,000 mt in the month, a decline of 30,000 mt or 7.69% month on month, JLC’s data shows. Most shipowners reduced purchases in early October, as they preferred to consume stockpiles during the National Day holiday. Operating ships decreased in mid-to-late October amid strong typhoons in southern China, and some ports’ bunkering business was hindered by the bad weather.

Domestic-trade light bunker fuel demand came in at 130,000 mt in the month, a loss of 10,000 mt or 7.14% from the previous month. Trade in the light bunker fuel market was limited, with shipowners still hesitant to make deals.

Bunker Fuel Supply

China’s bonded bunker fuel imports hit 22-month high in September

China’s bonded bunker fuel imports jumped significantly and set a 22-month high in September 2024, as domestic LSFO supply declined amid tight quotas.

The country imported 566,700 mt of bonded bunker fuel in the month, skyrocketing by 60.63% from the previous month and 45.38% from a year earlier, JLC estimated, with reference to data from the GACC. The imports hit the highest level since November 2022.

Bonded distributors imported more LSFO to meet demand when domestic refiners slashed their production amid lingering quota tightness. However, these distributors cut their high-sulphur fuel oil imports as their inventories remained relatively high. The imports of MGO were basically stable in September.

Malaysia still topped all suppliers by exporting 202,500 mt of bonded bunker fuel to China, which accounted for 35.73% of China’s total imports. Brazil came in second with 138,300 mt, accounting for 24.40%, followed by Singapore with 99,800 mt, making up 17.61%. Iraq and South Korea slipped to the fourth and fifth place with 85,200 mt and 40,900 mt, occupying 15.03% and 7.22% respectively.

China imported roughly 3.36 million mt of bonded bunker fuel in the first nine months, an upsurge of 16.39% from the corresponding months in 2023, speeding up from a rise of 11.86% in January-August.

China’s bonded bunker fuel imports are expected to hit a 23-month high in October, as domestic supply tightens amid quota shortages.

Chinese bonded bunker suppliers have imported more LSFO to meet demand lately, as Chinese refiners have cut their production amid shortage of quotas, according to market sources. By the end of September, Chinese oil refiners with LSFO export quotas (Sinopec, PetroChina, CNOOC, Sinochem and Zhejiang Petroleum and Chemical) had used 87.4% of their 2024 quotas, leaving quotas on only about 1.63 million mt for the last quarter, JLC’s data shows. This means they are likely to produce an average of roughly 545,000 mt of LSFO a month in the last quarter, versus a monthly average of about 1.26 million mt in January-September.

Bonded bunker fuel imports by source, Sept 2024 JLC Nov 2024

Domestic-trade bunker fuel supply tightens in October

Domestic-trade bunker fuel supply tightened in October, as cargo delivery was impeded by strict tax inspection, though the availability of blendstock increased.

Chinese blenders supplied about 370,000 mt of heavy bunker fuel in the month, a cut of 30,000 mt or 7.50% month on month, JLC’s data shows. At the same time, domestic-trade MGO supply slipped to 160,000 mt, down by 10,000 mt or 5.88% from a month earlier.

Arrival of imported fuel oil cargoes JLC Nov 2024

Bunker Prices, Profits

China main oil blending feedstock prices JLC Nov 2024

China domestic trading 180cSt bunker price, 2023 2024 JLC Nov 2024

China bunker blending profit by region, 2024 JLC Nov 2024

Editor
Yvette Luo
+86-020-38834382
[email protected]

Sales (Beijing)
Tony Tang
+86-10-84428863
[email protected]

Sales (Singapore)
Ginny Teo
+65-31571254
[email protected]
[email protected]

JLC Network Technology Co., Ltd is recognised as the leading information provider in China. We specialise in providing the transparent, high-value, authoritative market intelligence and professional analysis in commodity market. Our expertise covers oil, gas, coal, chemical, plastic, rubber, fertilizer and metal industry, etc.

JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report is published by JLC Network Technology Co., Ltd every month on China bunker market, demand, supply, margin, freight index, forecast and so on. The report provides full-scale & concise insight into China bunker oil market.

All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be photocopied, reproduced, retransmitted, put into a computer system or otherwise redistributed without prior authorization from JLC.

Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (September 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (August 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (July 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (June 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (May 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (April 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (March 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (February 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (January 2024)

Note: China-based commodity market information provider JLC Technology has been providing Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times China bunker volume data since 2020. Data from earlier periods are available here.

 

Photo credit: JLC Network Technology
Published: 13 November, 2024

 

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

Report: €40 billion needed for EU shipping’s energy transition

Building a supply chain for clean fuels in Europe is a priority for the industry to meet its decarbonisation targets and for Europe to achieve its climate targets, say stakeholders.

Admin

Published

on

By

Clean Maritime Fuels Platform

Clean Maritime Fuels Platform on Thursday (7 November) called on policymakers to create the regulatory conditions to unlock investments in the production of clean maritime fuels in the EU.

The Draghi Report estimates that €40 billion in annual investments will be needed between 2031 and 2050 for the energy transition of shipping.

Building a supply chain for clean fuels in Europe is a priority for the industry to meet its decarbonisation targets and for Europe to achieve its climate targets.

Clean Maritime Fuels Platform supports the report’s conclusions regarding the need to:

  • De-risk investments in renewable and low carbon fuels, for example via schemes based on Contracts for Difference and auctions as a service.
  • Launch dedicated sectoral calls under the Innovation Fund for the first deployment of decarbonisation solutions. The 20 million EU ETS allowances allocated to the decarbonisation of the maritime sector until 2030 should be used as soon as possible.
  • Expand existing funding mechanisms for refuelling and recharging infrastructure.
  • Start building a supply chain for renewable and low-carbon fuels in the EU.

European manufacturing capacity should match demand for clean shipping fuels in Europe as much as possible, in line with the benchmark of the Net-Zero Industry Act.

“The Draghi Report has recognised the global leadership of European shipping and the need to remain internationally competitive. In order to meet our targets, we need clean fuels available in the market in sufficient quantities and at an affordable price. To ensure that the shipping energy transition happen, the EU should de-risk investment in renewable and low carbon fuels and start building a supply chain for renewable and low-carbon fuels in the EU. Moreover, existing funding mechanisms for refuelling infrastructure should be expanded to better ensure the security of supply of clean fuels for shipping”, said Sotiris Raptis, ECSA Secretary General.

"Mr. Draghi’s report acknowledges the strategic role of renewable and low-carbon fuels, particularly in decarbonising all transport modes. His report highlights the EU's leadership in this area and calls for a truly technology-neutral approach. We, European Fuel Manufacturers, believe the right EU policy framework and subsidies can create a robust business case to attract private investments and avoid de-industrialization, help the EU successfully deliver climate neutrality by 2050, ensure a secure supply of energy, and foster innovative, EU-based, globally competitive industry for the welfare of EU economies and citizens", stated Liana Gouta, Director General of FuelsEurope.

“By linking the FuelEU Maritime with the supply mandates of the Renewable Energy Directive and abolishing stringent eligibility criteria, we can gradually increase eFuel capacities in the maritime sector.”, said Ralf Diemer, Managing Director of the eFuel Alliance.

“The following decade will lead to a fundamental shift in the European maritime fuel supply structure owing to the introduction of new regulations. The Draghi report places renewable and low-carbon fuels at the forefront of decarbonisation for the hard-to-abate maritime sector, and our industry is fully ready to support European shipowners to achieve this transition in a sustainable and cost-efficient way”, said Angel Alvarez Alberdi, Secretary General of EWABA.

“It is crucial to create a fertile environment for companies to invest in the production of competitive clean shipping fuels in Europe. Building on the Net-Zero Industry Act and the recommendations of the Draghi report, policymakers need to focus on to the importance of building a robust European supply chain for hydrogen and hydrogen derivatives in the maritime sector”, said Daniel Fraile, Chief Policy Officer of Hydrogen Europe.

“In the spirit of the Draghi-report, and for stimulating public and private investments, the EU should ensure that its regulations are in line with global developments, also in the maritime domain and notably with the IMO”, said R. Tim Eestermans, Managing Director Europe, Methanol Institute.

 

Photo credit: Clean Maritime Fuels Platform
Published: 11 November 2024

Continue Reading

Research

Sea Cargo Charter report demonstrates shipping’s shortfall against IMO climate goals

2024 report highlights the gap between current emissions and the IMO’s revised strategy for net-zero emissions by 2050.

Admin

Published

on

By

Sea Cargo Charter 2024 report

The shipping industry must take urgent action to meet ambitious new climate targets set by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), according to a new report released on Thursday (13 June) from the Sea Cargo Charter (SCC), a global transparency initiative developed by the Global Maritime Forum.

New data from the SCC, a global framework representing 20% of global bulk cargo transport, reveals the sector fell short of minimum international climate goals set by the IMO by an average of 17% in 2023, equivalent to 165 million metric tonnes of CO2e.

When considering ‘striving’ goals set by the IMO, signatories are on average 22% misaligned, which represents a shortfall of 204 million metric tonnes of CO2e in 2023.

Currently, dry bulk, general cargo, and tankers account for around 400 million tonnes of CO2 emissions. With global trade predicted to quadruple by 2050, emissions will skyrocket without urgent action.

Reporting has also been expanded to include “well-to-wake” emissions, which measure emissions from the extraction of oil to its end use, providing a more comprehensive picture of environmental impact and pushing the industry towards faster decarbonisation.

The 2024 report highlights the gap between current emissions and the IMO’s revised strategy for net-zero emissions by 2050. The report shows the importance of commercial and operational decisions on the vessels’ use (such as, instructed speed, cargo and routing optimisation, laden/ballast ratio), innovation and cooperation within the industry to be able to take action in this transition.

Other identified barriers to cutting emissions are geopolitical disruptions, limited alternative marine fuel options for long voyages, and a lack of infrastructure to support new technologies.

The 2024 Annual Disclosure Report was produced by the Global Maritime Forum, which performs secretariat services for the Sea Cargo Charter with expert support provided by UMAS and the Smart Freight Centre.

 

Photo credit: Sea Cargo Charter
Published: 14 June 2024

Continue Reading
Advertisement
  • SBF2
  • v4Helmsman Gif Banner 01
  • RE 05 Lighthouse GIF
  • Consort advertisement v2
  • Aderco advert 400x330 1
  • EMF banner 400x330 slogan

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS

  • SEAOIL 3+5 GIF
  • Triton Bunkering advertisement v2
  • 102Meth Logo GIF copy
  • Singfar advertisement final
  • HL 2022 adv v1


  • Synergy Asia Bunkering logo MT
  • Golden Island logo square
  • pro liquid
  • Uni Fuels oct 2024 ad
  • Mokara Final
  • E Marine logo
  • Auramarine 01
  • PSP Marine logo
  • Trillion Energy
  • Innospec logo v6
  • Headway Manifold
  • 400x330 v2 copy
  • Advert Shipping Manifold resized1
  • VPS 2021 advertisement

Trending