The Shipowners’ Club on Monday (1 September) published a bunker operations risk assessment form as a guidance for the maritime community to minimise the risks that come with routine bunkering operations.
Despite bunkering being a routine and common operation, disputes may arise, such as those regarding the quantity or quality of bunkers and in some cases the legality, if careful planning is not implemented, it said.
The consequences of such situations can vary from machinery breakdowns, to Port State Control (PSC) detentions, to delays, arrests and significant financial and reputational losses.
As the shipping industry moves towards cleaner fuels, there is an increased risk of such PSC detentions if the bunkers do not meet the required specifications.
The club noted it has seen a steady increase in the number of bunker disputes from 4 claims in 2015 to 36 cases in 2018, largely due to bunker quality or quantity but a small number are related to alleged illegal activity.
This risk assessment has been produced to assist Members in avoiding such situations and is mindful of the increased scrutiny that bunkers are now receiving due to the introduction of MARPOL Annex VI.
The club added that this sample risk assessment is not an exhaustive guide to bunkering operations. The content is based on findings from its causation analysis, with expanded guidance as far as practicable, to encompass the most salient points for the club’s membership.
The club emphasised that this risk assessment is for guidance purposes only and it is imperative that operators conduct their own risk assessments based on their individual operating procedures together with any requirements of their Flag states and of the local port authority.
A copy of The Shipowner Club’s bunker operations risk assessment form can be downloaded here.
Photo credit: The Shipowners’ Club
Published: 3 September 2020
Bonded bunker sales for state-owned enterprises and Zhoushan enterprises were 1.44 mln mt and 155,000 mt, accounting for 90.26% and 9.24% of total sales.
Megah Port Management, subsidiary of oil trading, marine fuel bunkering and investment player SIL, took over operation and management of LLT on Wednesday.
MOL plans to dispatch an additional team in late August; Nagashiki confirms the Master and Chief Officer of Wakashio have been arrested by local authorities.
‘There is no doubt that Mia's accession completes the circle, and I look forward to working with both of my daughters to further develop USTC,’ says USTC CEO & owner.
“The support we’ve been receiving from ship owners, suppliers and traders has been overwhelming,” says Head of Asian Business Development for Argus.
Development in quick response to customer demand for future ammonia-fueled ships and to contribute to the safe introduction of ammonia as a bunker fuel.
Program introduces periodic assessments, mass flow metering data analysis, and regular training for relevant key personnel to better handle the MFMS to ensure a high level of continuous operational competency.
U.S. Claims Register Summary recorded a total USD 833 million claim from a total 180 creditors against O.W. Bunker USA, according to the creditor list seen by Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times.
Glencore purchased fuel through Straits Pinnacle which contracted supply from Unicious Energy. Contaminated HSFO was loaded at Khor Fakkan port and shipped to a FSU in Tanjong Pelepas, Malaysia to be further blended.
Individuals were employees of surveying companies engaged by Shell to inspect the volume of oil loaded onto the vessels which Shell supplied oil to; they allegedly accepted bribes totalling at least USD 213,000.
MPA preliminary investigations revealed that the affected marine fuel was supplied by Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd who later sold part of the same cargo to PetroChina International (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
‘MPA had immediately contacted the relevant bunker suppliers to take necessary steps to ensure that the relevant batch of fuel was no longer supplied. Further investigations are currently on-going,’ it informs.
