Fuel Testing
Singapore to enhance testing for bunker fuel quality assurance from 1 June
Taking into account recommendations from IEG, formed following a contaminated bunker fuel delivery incident in 2022, and industry feedback, enhanced testing measures will be implemented upstream.
Published
8 months agoon
By
AdminMaritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) Chief Executive Teo Eng Dih on Tuesday (20 February) said enhanced testing measures for marine fuel batches will be implemented from 1 June 2024.
Following a contaminated bunker fuel delivery incident involving more than 200 vessels in 2022, an Industry Expert Group (IEG) co-chaired by the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) and Singapore Shipping Association was formed since 2022 to study measures to strengthen quality assurance and avoid contaminated bunker fuel from being supplied in the Port of Singapore.
Globally, contaminated fuels have caused vessels to experience handling and safety issues such as loss of propulsion.
Taking into account literature reviews, past cases, IEG’s recommendations and industry feedback such as from the International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA) and International Council on Combustion Engines (CIMAC), enhanced testing measures will be implemented.
To ensure cost effectiveness, ease of administration and system efficiencies, these measures will be implemented upstream, rather than for every delivery.
From 1 June 2024, bunker suppliers in Port of Singapore must ensure that:
- Residual & bio-residual bunker fuel do not contain Chlorinated Organic Compounds (COC) above 50mg/kg, & free from inorganic acids. COC can be tested using the EN 14077 accredited test method, while inorganic acids can use the ASTM D664 accredited test method as prescribed in ISO 8217.
- Distillate and bio-distillate bunker marine fuel must be free of inorganic acids which can be tested using the ASTM D664 test method as prescribed in ISO 8217.
- Residual marine fuels are free from polystyrene, polypropylene & polymethacrylate. These can be tested for by filtration, microscopic examination, & Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy analysis.
The test results for COC and inorganic acids, together with the Strong Acid Number (SAN) and Total Acid Number (TAN) will be reported in the “Certificate of Quality” (COQ) provided to receiving vessels. For the polymers, bunker suppliers must maintain test records which indicate the fuels are free of them.
“MPA will continue working with agencies and stakeholders to enhance polymer testing capabilities & establish standardised testing,” Eng added.
For marine fuel blended using batches of different fuel or feedstock, the respective tests should be carried out after blending, and before being bunkered in the Port of Singapore, as the COQ reflects the fuel prior to loading the bunker tanker.
These enhanced testing will supplement existing instruments used in the Port of Singapore, such as mass flow meters and digital bunkering, and inform the development of standards for safe & efficient bunkering of alternative marine fuels.
As a global bunkering hub, Singapore remains committed to maintaining high quality assurance of fuels delivered, and making bunker deliveries more transparent, efficient and reduce overall business costs to better serve shipowners, charterers and ships of the world.
Manifold Times previously reported MPA issued a Port Marine Circular No 3 of 2024 regarding the implementation of enhanced testing parameters for marine fuel batches intended to be delivered as bunkers in the port of Singapore in addition to the existing quality assurance measures:
Related: Singapore: MPA tightens testing parameters to reduce contaminated bunker fuels
Related: MPA: Glencore and PetroChina supplied contaminated bunkers to about 200 ships in the Port of Singapore
Related: Singapore set to become first port in the world to debut electronic bunker delivery notes
Related: MPA Chief Executive: Port of Singapore begins digital bunkering initiative today
Photo credit: Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore
Published: 21 February, 2024
Bunker Fuel Quality
VPS: Is your vessel fully protected from dangers of poor-quality bunker fuel?
VPS have issued 21 Bunker Alerts this year, which have highlighted witnessed quality issues with the three main fuel types of HSFO (6 alerts), VLSFO (9 alerts) and MGO (6 alerts), says Steve Bee of VPS.
Published
1 week agoon
October 2, 2024By
AdminSteve Bee, Group Commercial Director of marine fuels testing company VPS, on Tuesday (1 October) wrote about mitigating fuel quality risks and safeguarding vessel operations against poor-quality bunker fuels:
As the global marine fuel mix grows, becoming more varied and consequently more complex in terms of fuel management, there is a potential increasing risk to vessels, crew and the environment, from the possible impact of poor-quality fuels.
Yet, whilst shipping looks to decarbonise, with a view to introducing low-to-zero carbon fuels, such as biofuels and methanol, these fuels currently account for approximately 1% of the fuel mix. The more traditional fossil fuels are continuing to satisfy the day-to-day demand in terms of fuels supplied to vessels at this time, with almost 230 million MT of marine fuels being bunkered last year.
The VPS database shows for all fossil fuels tested the following current Off-specifications have been identified:
VPS Bunker Alerts, are also a good indication of current fuel quality and so far to date, VPS have issued 21 Bunker Alerts this year. These alerts have highlighted witnessed quality issues with the three main fuel types of HSFO (6 alerts), VLSFO (9 alerts) and MGO (6 alerts). The 2024 alerts show significant off-specifications for 8 different test parameters, from 11 different locations, across Europe, Middle-East, Asia and the Americas. This proves fuel quality issues can arise anywhere at any time, for any fuel type or test parameter.
June 2024, saw the 7th revision of the marine fuel standard ISO8217, released to the industry. ISO8217:2024 is seen as a major step forward in terms of setting specifications for marine fuel quality. This latest revision has moved from two fuel specification tables, to four. It now includes, for the first time, specifications for VLSFO and ULSFO fuels containing 0.50% or 0.10% sulphur respectively, plus biofuels containing FAME, HVO, GTL, BTL, bio-components.
Acknowledging that ISO8217:2024, is an improvement on previous revisions of the standard, it still does not cover enough of the further potentially problematic issues of chemical contamination, cold-flow properties, microbial-growth, plus wider bio-components such as Cashew Nut Shell Liquid (CNSL), to name but a few areas of concern.
In addition, the industry has a very poor track record of purchasing fuel against the very latest revision of the ISO8217 standard. To date, VPS as the world’s largest marine fuel quality testing company, still see 12.6% of samples received for quality testing, being purchased against the 2005 revision of the standard. So, vessels are purchasing fuel against a standard which is actually only 3 months off being 20 years old? That revision has since been replaced by four further revisions of the standard over the years and it bears very little relevance to today’s fuels. Therefore, these vessels are really operating at a significantly increased level of risk, if they are relying on ISO8217:2005 to fully protect them.
The most common revision against which marine fuel is purchased today, is still ISO8217:2010. 48% of all fuel samples received by VPS, are being tested against this revision. Again, ISO8217:2010 is almost 15 years old, so why is almost half of the fuel being purchased to it? There is no consideration of VLSFO, or ULSFO fuels, with FAME also being classed as a contaminant.
The 2017 revision, still only accounts for 20% of the fuel samples VPS receive for testing, even though its nearly eight years old. However, it does consider the presence of FAME within certain distillate grades, but still offers no specification for the lower sulphur grades of residual-based fuels, where VLSFOs are the most widely purchased fuel type.
All this means is the global fleet is buying fuel and testing its quality against a standard which is between 8-20 years old?
To date, VPS have not received a fuel sample, fossil fuel, or biofuel, purchased to the 2024 revision. Based on past history it maybe sometime before such a sample is received? Even then ISO8217:2024, whilst a major improvement to previous revisions, is not an all-encompassing standard.
As far back as 2018, The Swedish Club released their independent report, “Main Engine Damage”. This report highlighted how to avoid engine damage, including information showing the average cost of a single fuel management incident onboard a vessel was $344,069. It also stated the average cost of a single lubrication failure was $763,320.
The Swedish Club’s advice and recommendations were:
Back in 2019, in the lead up to IMO2020 and the reduction in the global sulphur cap to 0.50%, VPS foresaw potential quality issues with the new incoming VLSFO fuels. These fuels would be of higher paraffinic content, leading to poorer cold-flow behaviour, potential wax precipitation and major stability issues. VPS recognised that the ISO8217 standard did not provide sufficient protection to a vessel, when using VLSFO, or even HSFO and MGO fuels.
Therefore, the VPS Additional Protection (APS) service was launched prior to 2020. This service offers the full ISO8217 test scope, plus a number of additional tests, in one package offering, at a significantly reduced price, in order to ensure a greater level of protection to vessels and enhanced peace-of-mind to the, now more informed operator, using this service.
The APS Package is customised by fuel type, to cover, HSFO, VLSFO, or Distillates. The additional tests included, will provide much more information and greater understanding of the fuel in relation to stability, chemical contamination, cold-flow properties, lubricity and microbial-activity. The package can also be further customised to individual customer requirements. Many VPS customers have used and continue to use APS, to mitigate the potential risks from poor quality fuel and benefit from the added-value and cost savings, the service delivers.
In 2022, the incoming range of marine biofuels, warranted VPS to research a number of different additional tests to assist in identifying biofuel management issues and understanding their behaviour and operational risks. As a consequence, VPS launched the APS-BIO packages. Once again, these include the ISO8217 as a base test slate, but also include additional tests to measure energy content, stability, renewable content, microbial-activity, corrosivity and cold-flow properties. The APS-BIO suite of test slates cover different bio-components such as FAME, HVO, CNSL, plus the fossil fuels used in a bio-blend, eg HSFO, VLSFO, MGO.
Once again VPS customers, are seeing real benefits and added-value, as they look to use biofuels as their decarbonisation option, knowing that in VPS they have an experienced, expert fuel management partner.
Photo credit: VPS
Published: 2 October, 2024
Bunker Fuel Quality
NorthStandard includes VPS bunker fuel quality data in new platform
Fuel Insights app, powered by VPS PortStats, offers NorthStandard account holders with a view on fuel quality trends, based on data generated by VPS in key bunkering hubs across the globe.
Published
4 weeks agoon
September 11, 2024By
AdminMarine fuels testing company VPS on Tuesday (11 September) said it has been collaborating with global marine insurer NorthStandard over the past few months on incorporating fuel quality analytics into NorthStandard’s new Get SET! digital portfolio.
This collaboration has culminated into the launch of the NorthStandard Fuel Insights platform.
The NorthStandard Fuel Insights app, powered by VPS PortStats, offers NorthStandard account holders with a customised and exclusive view on fuel quality trends, based on the data generated by VPS’ laboratories located in key bunkering hubs across the globe.
Bunker procurement professionals can use this data to improve decision-making, by including off-specs and calorific value to the rationale, whilst technical managers can use the data to anticipate fuel quality risks to avoid bad bunkers.
The digital platform also provides insights beyond off-specs, by highlighting cautionary cases that may require additional treatment or operational advice.
With the advent of various types and blends of biofuels in the marine industry, VPS is committed to enriching this platform with relevant and actionable insights now and in the future.
“This is a unique collaboration in marine insurance,” said Colin Gillespie, Global Head of Loss Prevention, NorthStandard.
“It offers NorthStandard members easy access to global fuel statistics, as well as the tools to trade with confidence by managing risk and reducing claims in one of the most challenging areas of ship management.”
John Oosthoek, VP Operations Digital & Decarbonisation, VPS, said: “The launch of the Fuel Insights platform is the culmination of a growing partnership between NorthStandard and VPS over the past few years. By utilising reliable fuel quality data owners and operators can anticipate and mitigate the risks associated with fuel quality, such as cat fines, cold-flow, and stability.
“Testing remains essential for verifying quality, but accumulated data also helps vessel owners and operators make informed fuel procurement decisions,” said Steve Bee, Group Commercial & New Business Development Director, VPS.
“VPS services provide help in ensuring engines and fuel delivery systems do not suffer damage, crews stay healthy and safe, and ships achieve the required environmental legislation demands. For NorthStandard, Fuel Insights, powered by VPS will help ensure members and shipowners know what to look out for and subsequently enhance their ability to plan preventive maintenance.”
“Beyond mitigation, data could be invaluable to a claim or contract dispute,” added Gillespie. “For example, if substandard fuel was repeatedly linked to a single port, or if fuel issues on board had an onward impact of cargo delays. Shipowners and operators also need full transparency on fuel availability and quality, especially given the rapid rise of alternative fuels,” he said.
VPS controls shipping’s largest and most comprehensive marine fuel quality database, including the most extensive analysis of newer products, such as biofuels and methanol.
“Given that NorthStandard and VPS have the same forward-looking position on digitalisation, this partnership is a natural fit,” commented Bee.
“Accurate monitoring and reporting also help reduce emissions and will improve vessel performance against carbon intensity indices to ensure owners are on the right side of history.”
Photo credit: NorthStandard
Published: 11 September, 2024
Fuel Testing
FOBAS: Joint circular from MSC and MEPC on bunker fuel oil sampling guidelines
Joint circular extends the use of the MARPOL Delivered Sample to also be available for checking of the flash point requirement under SOLAS Chapter II-2/4.2.1.
Published
4 weeks agoon
September 11, 2024By
AdminLloyd’s Register Fuel Oil Bunkering Analysis and Advisory Service (FOBAS) on Tuesday (10 September) released a bulletin on IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) and Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC) jointly approving the fuel oil sampling guidelines during recent sessions (MSC 108 and MEPC 81):
IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) and Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC) during recent sessions (MSC 108 and MEPC 81) jointly approved the fuel oil sampling guidelines MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.18 for compliance verification with MARPOL Annex VI and SOLAS chapter II-2.
This joint circular from MSC and MEPC was issued 11 July 2024 and revokes the previous MEPC resolution 182(59) titled ‘2009 Guidelines for the sampling of fuel oil for determination of compliance with the revised MARPOL Annex VI’.
In essence, this Circular simply extends the use of the MARPOL Delivered Sample to also be available for checking of the flash point requirement under SOLAS Chapter II-2/4.2.1 where it is referred to as the Representative Sample. The basic requirements as given by the 2009 Guidelines as regards the sampling location, arrangements and procedures are unchanged apart from the minimum sample size has been increased from 400ml to 600ml. Also unchanged are the sample labelling and sample storage aspects.
The joint circular now provides explicit references in the text to the need that personnel undertaking the sampling and the subsequent MARPOL Delivered Sample preparation, should be familiar with the use of the equipment and the Guidelines. Also, that the sampling operation itself should be witnessed by both the ship’s and supplier’s representatives.
The one particular addition is the new Section 10 which covers the procedures and documentation requirements in those instances where the fuel oil’s flash point is to be checked. This in no way impacts on the MARPOL Annex VI Appendix VI requirements in respect of the sulphur verification procedures which are unaltered.
Moreover, with regard to the key point of keeping track of these MARPOL Delivered Samples, this is now given as being the company’s responsibility rather than the ship’s master as previously. This will be important where samples are taken off the ship for testing, but the remaining material is not subsequently returned.
It should be noted that it is the sole prerogative of the representatives of the Parties to either MARPPOL Annex VI or SOLAS, as applicable, to take a MARPOL Delivered Sample for testing. Those sample cannot be opened or tested for any other purposes such as the resolution of commercial quality disputes.
Photo credit: Louis Reed from Unsplash
Published: 11 September, 2024
SIBCON 2024: EnterpriseSG to launch new Singapore standard for e-BDN
SIBCON 2024: SGMF releases methanol and ammonia bunkering guidelines
SIBCON 2024: TFG Marine to launch ZeroNorth e-BDNs in Singapore
Singapore and Shandong ink MoU for Green and Digital Shipping Corridor
Bunker One to launch physical LNG bunker fuel supply in January 2025
Dan-Bunkering to launch new offshore bunker tanker off Trinidad
ENGINE: Europe & Africa Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (9 October 2024)
Nunchi Marine: Big opportunities and challenges await bunker trading sector
DNV on IMO CCC 10: Interim guidelines for ammonia and hydrogen as bunker fuel
Sea Trader subsidiary opens third Asia bunker trading office in Singapore
Trial against Hin Leong Trading Founder and children draws to an end
Europe’s largest LNG bunkering barge on maiden voyage to ARA
Reed Smith: Legal ramifications of Baltimore Bridge collision
Singapore: Annual general meetings scheduled for An Hui Shipping, Nan Yi Maritime
Trending
-
Interview1 week ago
Nunchi Marine: Big opportunities and challenges await bunker trading sector
-
Alternative Fuels2 weeks ago
DNV on IMO CCC 10: Interim guidelines for ammonia and hydrogen as bunker fuel
-
Bunker Fuel1 week ago
Sea Trader subsidiary opens third Asia bunker trading office in Singapore
-
Legal1 week ago
Trial against Hin Leong Trading Founder and children draws to an end
-
Newbuilding2 weeks ago
Europe’s largest LNG bunkering barge on maiden voyage to ARA
-
Legal2 weeks ago
Reed Smith: Legal ramifications of Baltimore Bridge collision
-
Winding up2 weeks ago
Singapore: Annual general meetings scheduled for An Hui Shipping, Nan Yi Maritime
-
Alternative Fuels7 days ago
Greece joins Clean Energy Marine Hubs to support low-carbon fuels