Connect with us

Business

Singapore: Master MFM bunker verification gathers international praise; stakeholders explain its benefits

INTERTANKO, BIMCO, SSA, IBIA Asia share what the technology brings to the waterfront, while operator Metcore International and manufacturer Endress+Hauser explain its benefits to the bunkering industry.

Admin

Published

on

Sibcon master meter story

The planned introduction of having a master mass flow meter (MFM) to verify the traceability of bunkering duty MFMs operating at Singapore port has gathered international praise from shipping associations, learned Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times.

The International Association of Independent Tanker Owners – INTERTANKO

“The use of a master meter to check on the accuracy of MPA-approved MFM systems installed on bunker tankers would be a good development as it may help to safeguard the interests of ship owners and bunker buyers that lift bunkers in Singapore,” says Elfian Harun, Environment Manager & Assistant Regional Manager Asia-Pacific at INTERTANKO.

“With the safeguards in place, INTERTANKO members could have greater confidence that they will be getting the bunker quantity they paid for.”

Baltic and International Maritime Council – BIMCO

The Manager, Marine Environment at BIMCO, believes the development will be beneficial to shipowners lifting fuel at Singapore port and is confident of the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA)’s capabilities to regulate the local bunkering market.

“The use of mass flow metering provides a standard for measuring mass of bunkers delivered to the ship. Standardisation is crucial to ensure a level playing field for shipping. BIMCO hopes that the rest of the bunker ports around the world will follow the excellent example set by Singapore,” shares Christian Bækmark Schiolborg.

“The implementation of Mass Flow Metering cannot stand alone. Exactly as the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore is doing, mass flow metering needs to be complemented by the implementation of a bunker licensing scheme and enforcement by the port authority to ensure transparency, standardised regular calibration, and discourage tampering with the mass flow metering.”

Singapore Shipping Association – SSA

The master MFM verification service operates on the principles of TR 80:2020 – Meter Verification using Master Mass Flow Meter; a recently launched technical reference at Singapore port.

“The TR 80:2020 which is the Technical Reference for Mass Flow Meter verification by Master Meter is another step to ensure that the duty meters continue to be accurate so that there is trust in this mass flow meter for the supply of accurate quantity to the ships that lift their bunkers in Singapore,” notes Caroline Yang, the President of Singapore Shipping Association (SSA).

“This TR has to work together hand in hand with the other Singapore Standards, such as SS 524 (Specification for Quality Management for Bunker Supply Chain), Codes of Practice SS 600 and SS 648 for Bunkering and Bunker Mass Flow Metering. All these standards provide transparency in the bunker supply chain.

“However, we need to understand that ‘standards’ are voluntary, it is in Singapore that these standards are mandatorily applied by our regulatory authority, MPA. Any non-compliance will attract penalties and revoking of licences, which MPA has indeed done so.

“All of the above will provide confidence to ship owners that when they buy bunkers in Singapore, on the basis of all these standards and upheld with rigour by the regulatory authority, that integrity of bunker supply is maintained.”

Singapore Standards Council – Technical Committee for Bunkering

The introduction of a master meter verification service to support the MFM bunkering infrastructure of Singapore will enhance its image as a trusted bunkering port for ship owners, highlights the Chairman of the Technical Committee for Bunkering.

“Singapore now has two frontline MFM bunkering standards, SS 648:2019 and SS 660:2020, specifying requirements and procedures for bunker fuel custody transfer from bunker tanker to vessel and from oil terminal jetty to bunker tanker respectively,” says Seah Khen Hee.

“The TR80 completes the trinity of MFM bunkering standards that cover the local bunker supply chain and provides ship owners the assurance that quality benchmarks are upheld throughout the bunker custody transfer process.

“Duty MFMs require regular periodic meter verification, in line with best practices for measuring instruments (e.g. annually), to check that they perform their role within the specified requirements of the two MFM bunkering standards over their service life. Measurement integrity and performance can also be interfered with through tampering or other means, violating the system integrity requirements of the two standards.

“TR 80:2020 which covers meter verification using the master MFM, serves the important function of verifying the frontline duty MFMs for compliance with the standards. The authorities can apply TR 80 for periodic checks and ‘spot checks’. Companies can also use meter verification as a means of assessment as part of inventory management.

“When enforced and/or applied, TR 80 helps to uphold trust and integrity of the Singapore bunkering eco-system and the bunker supply chain from the oil terminal to the vessel. Ship owners and charterers buying bunkers in Singapore will have better assurance of fair trade and encounter less dispute situations.”

Seah notes meter verification will benefit local bunker suppliers and operators of bunker tankers at Singapore.

“Under TR 80, meter verification provides an acceptable, accurate, less costly, less time consuming and more efficient method of verifying a duty MFM. Meter verification takes half a day to complete. Less downtime means more productive time especially for the bunker tanker,” he adds.

“Knowing that an MFM is properly doing its job is an important part of managing oil inventory at various transfer points along the bunker supply chain whether as a custodian or owner of the inventory. Oil loss control and minimization affect profitability in significant ways.

“With enhanced trust on the bunkering environment in Singapore, bunker suppliers and bunker tanker owners will also be able to benefit from more trade.”

Seah, meanwhile, explains the difference between zero verification and meter verification.

“Zero verification and meter verification serve separate and distinct functions, both of which are required when operating the MFM for custody transfer. MFMs, like all measuring instruments installed in the field, are affected by conditions in their operating environments over time. These conditions cause the MFM to drift,” he shares.

“Zero verification is a process to check the duty MFM if its meter zero is within acceptable limits under no flow conditions. Zero verification is conducted quarterly in the first year and half-yearly from the second year onwards. Results of zero verification will guide further action, if needed.

“Meter verification as applied to bunkering is a process to check the duty MFM if it is measuring bunker fuel correctly under stable flow conditions at operating flow rates between its Qmin and Qmax.

“When the meter verification result exceeds the specified limit, further investigation is warranted to identify and implement solutions. Regular periodic meter verification is necessary and over time, trends on any meter drift will be known and will guide further corrective action if necessary. Meter verification will help owners of duty MFMs to better manage inventory risk.”

International Bunker Industry Association – IBIA Asia

MFM verification via master meter is a scientifically proven approach to support Singapore’s MFM-equipped bunker tanker operators and the international shipping community, notes Alex Tang, Regional Manager Asia at IBIA Asia.

“Meter verification by using a master meter is a very interesting topic and it happens one of our IBIA members – Metcore International Pte Ltd – wrote about the subject in our upcoming IBIA Autumn- World Bunkering magazine on master meter introduction; I would highly recommend interested parties to read this,” Tang shares.

“If you need a copy, feel free to contact any IBIA regional representative for it. Meter verification via a master meter is deemed as a scientifically metrological and traceable approach to support bunker tanker operators and the shipping community.

“As technology evolves, bunker tanker owners and operators should consider verification technologies which are reliable, robust, effective, efficient in application, economical and traceable.”

Metcore International – owner and operator of the master meter

“It’s the right time. Having a traceable reference standard like the master meter to check on the accuracy of mass flowmeters, definitely enhances a bunker tanker owner and operator’s measurement integrity for bunker fuel delivery,” states Darrick Pang, the Managing Director of MFM consultancy Metcore International Pte Ltd.

“The master meter approach complements zero verification (ZV), which is performed frequently to check on the zero drift, especially to monitor the health of the MFM and in the change of bunker fuel grade.”

Metcore is the owner and operator of the master MFM which has undergone tests at Singapore port since early 2020; to date, the master MFM is pending approval from Singapore regulatory authorities.

Pang notes Singapore, as the world’s largest bunkering hub, recorded bunker fuel sales of 47.5 million metric tonnes (mt) worth approximately USD 30 billion in 2019.

“Even half a percent error results in huge amount of money unaccounted for, hence the stakes are very high,” he says while adding, “the equipment, process, mechanism used for the meter verification has to be sophisticated, traceable and reliable.”

According to Pang, there are tangible and intangible benefits of using the master MFM.

“One of the major tangible benefits include control of oil loss, which can help in significantly improving the mass balance of an end user’s asset,” he explains.

“The MFM verification operation becomes much faster using the master meter. As a result, the downtime of the board tanker is reduced substantially. Overall expenditure around the verification is also drastically cut down.

“Above all, embracing the traceable Master Meter verification will further enhance the credibility and trust of Singapore as an international bunkering port.”

Endress+Hauser – manufacturer of the master meter

The Endress+Hauser master MFM built for supporting Singapore’s bunkering sector is among the most accurate manufactured in the world, Mohamed Abdenbi, Business Process Consultant – Bunkering & Fuel Supply Chain points out.

“Endress+Hauser has put in a lot of efforts in conceptualising, designing, engineering and manufacturing this Master MFM system which will provide a reliable, sustainable MFM life cycle management infrastructure to support the whole bunkering industry,” he said.

“When producing a master meter at Endress+Hauser, utmost professional care is taken to manufacture the MFM with the tightest production tolerances. This is only possible under the supervision of most experienced Endress+Hauser quality control specialists.

“The master meter, during its manufacturing process has undergone rigorous calibrations, first a bidirectional calibration with water, at our ISO/IEC 17025 accredited calibration lab in Switzerland which has a best measurement uncertainty of 0.015%.

“It was then calibrated with its skid assembly using fuel oil of similar viscosity and properties at an internationally recognised, ISO/IEC 17025 accredited, independent hydrocarbon flow facility in Europe.

“During the hydrocarbon calibration the master MFM from E+H is linearized over achievable Reynolds number, a superior method providing the most accurate and traceable reference for the MFM in the field for custody transfer purposes.”

According to Abdenbi, although a duty meter installed on the bunker tanker (intended for custody transfer) and the master meter have similar components and design, both serve different purposes.

“The sole purpose of the master meter is meant to determine possible drift of the duty MFM during meter verification and is not supposed to be used for custody transfer measurement,” he highlights while adding the use of a master MFM for verification is a common practise in the world of custody transfer.

“Besides bunkering, other areas of the oil & gas industry which have been using Coriolis master meters for decades to prove duty MFMs include terminals with trucks, rail cars and ship loading stations as well as pipeline transfer stations.

“Besides the oil & gas industry, other industries which are using master meters for frequent verification with great success are food & beverage, life sciences, chemicals, and more.

“The reasons master meters are being used in these industries are accuracy, simplicity of operation, low operating costs, proven in use and its ability to fulfil the transparency requirement from regulatory bodies for audit purposes.

“Given the benefits and simplicity of MFMs in terms of operation and maintenance, more and more industries are using MFMs and master meters not only for the custody transfer points but also for the process applications as well.

“You cannot manage what you can’t measure accurately. If the data from the field is not accurate and reliable, even having a very sophisticated supervisory system will not help to achieve the desired efficiency in operations.”

 

Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 9 October, 2020

Continue Reading

Business

Shell MGO bunker heist: Bunker clerk pleads guilty to helping Sentek acquire misappropriated fuel

Wong Wai Meng, who received more than USD 286,000 from Sentek Marine & Trading for his assistance, pleaded guilty to 12 counts of intentionally helping the firm acquire the misappropriated marine gas.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Ekaterina Bolovtsova on PEXELS

A bunker clerk, Wong Wai Meng, who received more than USD 286,000 (SGD 384,681) from Singapore-based Sentek Marine & Trading (Sentek) for his assistance, pleaded guilty to 12 counts of intentionally helping the company acquire misappropriated marine gas oil, The Straits Times reported on Friday (29 November).

The 58-year-old Singaporean was employed at the Sentek when he assisted in acquiring more than 28,000 metric tonnes (mt) of the misappropriated fuel worth USD 13.58 million (SGD 18.26 million). 

Wong committed the offences over 46 occasions between August 2014 and December 2017.

Wong is among the three bunker clerks previously employed by Sentek, who were charged for offences under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (CDSA) and the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA).

Another bunker clerk among the three charged, Wong Kuin Wah, 61, was sentenced to seven years and six months’ jail on 18 November for his role in misappropriating more than 27,000 tonnes of gas oil worth around USD 12.8 million (SGD 17.2 million).

The third individual who was charged, Boo Pu Wen, reportedly passed away in July 2023 and had his charges abated following his death, meaning Boo’s court proceedings over his 19 charges at the time came to an end. 

Former Shell employees, who were key members of a group who dishonestly misappropriated fuel from Shell Pulau Bukom, were sentenced to jail in court earlier.

Earlier coverage of developments by Manifold Times regarding the Shell MGO bunker heist can be found below:

Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-Shell employees sentenced to more than 23 years in prison each
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-Shell employees plead guilty to multiple offences
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-Shell employee receives over 16-year jail sentence
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-Intertek Surveyor sentenced to four months’ jail for corruption
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-Intertek Surveyor pleads guilty to corruption charge
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Shell Process Technician receives 195-month jail sentence
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Police seize property, cars, watches from ex-Shell Bukom Process Technician
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-Shell blending specialist jailed over USD 956,000 worth of misappropriated gasoil
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Former Intertek, Inspectorate surveyors receive fines, jail sentences
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-CCIC Singapore surveyor pleads guilty to misconduct, receiving USD 12k in bribes
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-Process Technician receives 184-month prison sentence over illicit involvement
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Syndicate member’s nephew jailed over concealment of safe containing valuables
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: 12 former surveyors from Intertek, Inspectorate, CCIC, SGS charged for corruption
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Former Shore Loading Officer receives 29-year jail sentence over total 85 charges
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-Process Technician received minimum SGD 735,000 in benefits, faces 43 charges
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Ex-Shell employee admits leading role in illicit operation
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Sentek ex-Director faces 40 fresh charges
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Two former Shell employees jailed over theft
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: High Court affirms ‘Prime South’ forfeiture to Singapore State
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Three ex-Shell employees charged with bribing surveyors
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Second ex-Shell employee pleads guilty to nine charges
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: First ex-Shell employee to plead guilty over involvement
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Director of Singapore bunkering firm released from police custody
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Oil tanker ‘Prime South’ forfeited by State Courts of Singapore
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist: Director of Singapore bunkering firm face charge at State Courts
Related: Shell Singapore oil heist: Third offender pleads guilty for gas oil theft
Related: Captain of “Prime South” jailed in Shell Pulau Bukom gas oil theft
Related: Shell Singapore oil heist: Ex-Chief Officer of Prime South jailed
Related: Singapore: Shell MGO bunker heist amount balloons to USD$142 million
Related: Shell MGO bunker heist update: Fresh charges issued at Singapore court
Related: Shell Singapore oil heist: More charges issued at court
Related: Shell Singapore oil heist: Breakdown of stolen oil cargoes
Related: Intertek Singapore employee among Shell oil heist suspects

 

Photo credit: Katrin Bolovtsova
Published: 2 December, 2024

Continue Reading

Biofuel

Singapore: GCMD introduces new technique for FAME bio bunker fuel fingerprinting

Fingerprinting identifies feedstock origins of FAME-based biofuels used in shipping industry; can be used as a potential tool to detect fraud in marine fuel supply chains and ensure biofuel authenticity.

Admin

Published

on

By

Singapore: GCMD introduces new technique for FAME bio bunker fuel fingerprinting

The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) on Monday (2 December) released its latest report, presenting a new technique that creates a fingerprint for Fatty Acid Methyl Esters(FAME) bio bunker fuels.

This fingerprint identifies the feedstock origins of the FAME-based biofuels used in the shipping industry.

GCMD said FAME fingerprinting is needed as the shipping sector is increasingly using biofuels, such as FAME, to reduce its GHG emissions. With that, concerns have arisen regarding the legitimacy of biofuels and whether they are truly sustainable. 

Industry bodies are seeing a rising number of cases mislabelling biofuels purported to be made from recycled oils and fats, while suspicions persist that they might be produced from cheaper and less sustainable virgin oils.

“To address these concerns, FAME fingerprinting can be used as a potential tool to detect fraud in marine fuel supply chains and ensure biofuel authenticity. By providing a physical validation method that complements existing certification schemes, FAME fingerprinting can help justify the green premium with genuine environmental benefits and safeguard the integrity of marine fuels supply chain,” GCMD said. 

FAME fingerprinting is based on the principle that the fatty acid profile of FAME is unique to its feedstock and can be preserved during feedstock transesterification to produce FAME. The "fingerprint" can then be compared against a database of known fatty acid profiles to identify the feedstock origin. 

GCMD worked with VPS who modified existing fuel testing methods to carry out sample analyses using a gas chromatograph with flame-ionisation detection, an instrument commonly found in fuel test laboratories. 

The analysis takes about an hour, comparable to the turnaround time for current marine fuel quality testing in the supply chain. 

“We have tested this method on a variety of FAME samples from different suppliers, including virgin oils, used cooking oils, palm oil mill effluent, beef tallow and food waste and were able to identify the feedstock origins for each sample,” GCMD added.

Manifold Times previously reported Captain Rahul Choudhuri, President, Strategic Partnerships at marine fuels testing company VPS, forecasting the use of finger printing technology today will likely establish a blueprint of how future alternative bunker fuels’ feedstocks are authenticated.

Captain Choudhuri said this when he gave an update of VPS’ biofuels finger printing trials with GCMD.

Note: The full report, titled ‘Rapid forensic analysis of FAME-based biofuels: Potential use of its fingerprint as a fraud detection tool’, can be downloaded here

Related: Marine Fuels 360: Fingerprinting to play key role in proving biofuel feedstock authenticity and beyond, says VPS
Related: GCMD-led consortium completes trials of sustainable biofuel bunker supply chains
Related: Dr. Nicholas Clague shares VPS’ experience with alternative bunker fuels
Related: Dubai: Shipowners and peers discuss realities of biofuel adoption at VPS Biofuels Seminar
Related: Singapore: VPS panel discussion presents a masterclass in shipping’s biofuel bunker adoption issues to the deck

 

Photo credit: Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation
Published: 2 December, 2024

Continue Reading

Methanol

PLAGEN to produce and supply green methanol bunker fuel with Latvia plant

Korean firm’s MoU with AE Risinājumi will see construction of Latvia’s first commercial-scale green methanol production plant, which will supply green methanol to ships in EU’s maritime fleet.

Admin

Published

on

By

PLAGEN to produce and supply green methanol bunker fuel with Latvia plant

South Korean clean energy firm PLAGEN on Friday (29 November) signed an MOU with Latvian company, AE Risinājumi, for the production of green methanol in Latvia at the “2024 Latvia-Korea Business Forum” hosted by the President of Latvia.

The agreement will result in the construction of Latvia's first commercial-scale green methanol production plant, which will supply green methanol to ships in the EU's maritime fleet, contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transportation.

PLAGEN's MoU aims to produce 20,000 metric tonnes (mt) of green methanol per year and will begin feasibility studies in the first half of 2025, and full-scale production will begin in 2028.

With 53% of Latvia's land area covered by forests, timber production and wood processing make a significant contribution to Latvia’s economic production, which generates a large amount of forest residues and wood wastes. In addition, Latvia also has an abundance and low price of renewable electricity from wind power. 

Latvia is one of the most competitive countries in the European Union, as it can produce clean methanol at a competitive price by using abundant wood waste as a raw material and renewable electricity from cheap wind power.

The use of abundant forest residues and wood wastes as a feedstock and cheap renewable electricity from wind power makes it possible to produce green methanol with a competitive price, making Latvia is one of the most competitive countries in the EU.

In the European Union, the European Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS) will come into effect in 2025, requiring shipping companies to purchase carbon credits for their greenhouse gas emissions.

In addition, the EU is implementing FuelEU Maritime, which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2% below the 2020 average by 2025 and 80% by 2050. This is expected to result in an energy transition to green methanol.

In July 2023, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted a revised strategy that calls for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships to net-zero by or around 2050, and plans to introduce full-scale regulations from 2027, and shipping companies have begun ordering methanol-powered ships fueled by green methanol, a carbon-neutral fuel.

“We expect to start producing green methanol in Latvia in 2028, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions from EU maritime transport vessels and contribute significantly to the revitalization of the Latvian economy and national energy security,” said John Kyung, CEO of PLAGEN.

In November 2024, PLAGEN completed the purchase of an industrial complex and received a government permit for the construction of the country's first green methanol plant in Dongjeom Industrial Complex in Taebaek City, Gangwon-do. 

The project, which will produce 10,000 mt per year, is scheduled to begin construction in the first half of 2025 and begin production in the second half of 2027.

Related: Korea: Taebaek City and PLAGEN to build green methanol bunker fuel plant
Related: Korean firm PLAGEN plans green methanol production project for bunkering

 

Photo credit: PLAGEN
Published: 2 December, 2024

Continue Reading
Advertisement
  • RE 05 Lighthouse GIF
  • Consort advertisement v2
  • Aderco advert 400x330 1
  • EMF banner 400x330 slogan
  • SBF2
  • v4Helmsman Gif Banner 01

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS

  • SEAOIL 3+5 GIF
  • 102Meth Logo GIF copy
  • Singfar advertisement final
  • Triton Bunkering advertisement v2
  • HL 2022 adv v1


  • E Marine logo
  • PSP Marine logo
  • Synergy Asia Bunkering logo MT
  • Auramarine 01
  • Mokara Final
  • endress
  • pro liquid
  • 300 300
  • Central Star logo
  • Golden Island logo square
  • 400x330 v2 copy
  • VPS 2021 advertisement
  • Advert Shipping Manifold resized1
  • Headway Manifold

Trending