Connect with us

Business

Singapore: Latest Covid-19 measures cause confusion, disruption for bunkering and surveying sectors

IBIA Asia, ABIS, sources from Singapore’s bunkering and surveying companies, and an industry veteran share with Manifold Times the issues expected from MPA’s latest Covid-19 measures.

Admin

Published

on

Surveyor checking level

The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) in the week ending January 17, 2021 issued several measures to prevent the further spread of Covid-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) within the shipping community in Singapore.

Amongst initiatives were mandatory contactless bunkering operations to be conducted effective 15 January, a prioritised vaccination programme for bunker surveyors and shore-based maritime personnel, and the revised Port Marine Circular (PMC No. 04 of 2021).

Additionally, MPA had earlier introduced a stop in crew change operations in the week ended January 10 for the bunkering sector.

Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times spoke to several sources within the marine fuels and surveying sectors; many were keen to support the initiatives but seemed to believe the latest changes could adversely affect waterfront operations.

KUDOS TO MPA FOR MAINTAINING ‘BALANCING ACT’

“The intention is a positive one. I believe MPA has taken a pragmatic approach in enhancing Singapore’s continued positon as the world’s largest bunkering port while at the same time putting in place rules and additional controls to mitigate the spread of Covid-19 within the republic’s shipping sector,” said the Director of a Singapore-based bunker surveying firm.

“This is no simple task and the issue is a sensitive one as the port authority has got to balance requirements coming from government ministries while at the same time ensuring that bunkering and Singapore’s maritime sector does not come to a halt.

“To me, the surveyor’s role is now more important than ever as with the latest changes there will be not be a representative from the bunker tanker present onboard the receiving vessel during marine refuelling operations.

“As such, the surveyor has now got to ensure the mass flow meter (MFM) documentation, and other aspects of the operation, such as sample collection are well taken care of while passing the proper details back down to the bunker tanker.”

The owner of another bunker surveying company was pleased the Singapore government and MPA have prioritised vaccination for bunker surveyors and shore-based maritime personnel at no additional cost.

However, he opined that the introduction of contactless bunkering operations has created certain issues which needed clarification.

“With contactless bunkering, marine fuel suppliers are now pin pointing that sampling procedures conducted onboard a receiving vessel without the witness of a cargo officer or surveyor are not credible and not in compliance with SS 648,” he said.

“Surveyors will not be able to do their job if they cannot board the bunker tanker to inspect the security seals on the MFM bunkering system.

“Also, it seems certain players in the bunkering and surveying sectors have been caught unaware of any industry briefings on PMC No. 04 of 2021. The rollout of this PMC seems to be scattered as not everyone in the sector had the invite to the online briefing.”

COMMENT FROM BUNKER ASSOCIATIONS

Several parties contacted by Manifold Times were confused with the language used in paragraph 10 of PMC No. 04 of 2021 which stated:

Shore-based personnel who have carried out a job on board an ocean-going vessel in the port of Singapore must not, in the next 7 days, go on board a harbour craft or pleasure craft, to carry out a job.

In addition, they believed following paragraph ‘B’ of the Precautionary Measures for Contactless Operations document will lead to further disruption of operations. Paragraph ‘B’ states:

A bunker surveyor must not, for the duration of his/her assignment to carry out work onboard any receiving vessel, board any bunker craft for any purpose.

Association of Bunker Industry (Singapore) ABIS 

“We understand the seriousness of the Covid-19 situation and we also do not want to increase the local cases in Singapore,” said ABIS President Daniel Phua.

Phua noted certain words within PMC No. 04 of 2021, specifically ‘harbour craft’ and ‘pleasure craft’, were not clearly defined; which may result in confusion within the bunkering and general maritime community.

“Regarding the policy where a surveyor cannot be allowed to go onboard ‘harbour craft’ and ‘pleasure craft’ for seven days after working on an ocean-going vessel, we are unsure if the certain ships include ferry services such as launch craft,” he asks.

“If yes, the next question will be to ask how does the surveyor get transportation from the pier to the client vessel? At the very least, launch craft should be exempted from the restrictions as it is a means of transportation for bunker surveyors.”

Phua also voiced concerns from bunker suppliers that the new method of having bunker samples taken onboard the receiving vessel due to contactless bunkering operations creates issues in the event of disputes.

“Since IMO 2020 there have been cases of fuel quality problems. If the bunker tanker is not monitoring or ensuring that the proper sample is being taken from the vessel manifold, it may potentially cause bigger commercial losses in the event of a fuel quality dispute,” he explains.

“Since no one from the bunker tanker is now going onboard the receiving vessel, does that mean our Singapore bunkering standard SS 648 doesn’t apply during this period? If so, will there be an official exemption stating this and for how long a period?

“This is important as all bunker surveying firms are certified under ISO 17020 which assess the company under the SS 648 standard. If the surveyor cannot be assessed under SS 648, how can the company be certified to continue operations?”

Phua confirmed all ABIS members, including its eight bunker surveying firms, support the Singapore government and MPA’s vaccination programme for the republic’s maritime sector.

“We intend to fully comply with the vaccination programme but would like to seek clarification on whether vaccinated personnel would still be subjected to the 7-day restriction of boarding harbour crafts as per PMC No. 04 of 2021,” Phua asks.

“We suggest MPA to hold a more open dialogue with various stakeholders including bunker surveyors, shipping agents, maritime technicians, and more.”

International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA) Asia

The Regional Manager of Asia at the International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA), meanwhile, says they are aware of the situation and are in the midst of collecting further information to assist MPA.

“We have received feedback from bunker industry stakeholders who have expressed concerns and need some clarification regarding the recent Port Marine Circular No. 04 of 2021,” noted Alex Tang.

“They support the Covid-19 precautions and procedures such as the increased frequency on Rostered Routine Testing (RRT) and vaccinations.

“As part of IBIA’s commitment to support the bunker sector, we are currently compiling a list of concerns and clarifications regarding the recent Port Marine Circular No. 04 of 2021.

“IBIA Asia will provide feedback from the industry to the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore.”

SINGAPORE BUNKER SUPPLIERS SHARE THOUGHTS

Singapore-based bunker suppliers which Manifold Times spoke to anticipate operational disruptions in light of PMC No. 04 of 2021 which restricts shore-based personnel to board harbour craft and pleasure craft for seven days after working on an ocean-going vessel.

“Such a situation will result in an increased cost for harbour craft players if the movement of shore-based personnel such as service engineers are restricted,” said the owner of a bunkering firm.

“Bunkering firms which are engaged in the harbour craft business typically engage shore-based service engineers supplied by dedicated service engineering firms to maintain their bunker tankers.

“With PMC No. 04 of 2021, we are expecting these service engineering firms to split their teams which will result in either increased costs or delayed maintenance as their engineers who worked on ocean-going vessels will now not be able to get onboard bunker tankers.

“I have a business to continue and building upon the crew change restrictions implemented in early January, this latest development is going to be very challenging and we expect the cost to skyrocket.”

A source at another Singapore bunkering firm, meanwhile, believed the latest Covid-19 measures could be better managed if they were rolled out in a step-by-step manner.

“As an international shipowner, my shore-based staff have very specialised tasks to perform on both our bunker tankers and oceangoing ships; it now seems they can now only do one job every 7 days and this is going to cause a lot of delays,” he said.

“Further, this group is now being told to go for vaccination at the same time.

“I believe this flow can be better organised if they are first told to go for vaccination as fast as possible, and then be subjected to the 7-day restriction thereafter.

“We can use contractors for the same job but they will jack up the price as with the new changes maximisation on their side is no longer available.”

A BUNKER INDUSTRY VETERAN SPEAKS UP

Rounding up, Singapore bunker industry veteran Simon Neo shared his thoughts of the situation with Manifold Times by explaining certain issues need more clarity from the port authority.

“For physical bunker suppliers, the issue with contactless bunkering is how do we know the sample collection on the receiving vessel will be properly carried out when there is no surveyor in attendance,” he explained.

“Additionally, in the event of a bunker spill due to an unsecured flange connection, and the connection isn’t done by bunker tanker crew due to contactless bunkering, who would then be liable for damages?

“These are just some of the very basic things that need to be addressed.”

Neo further highlighted a potential regulatory issue due to the stoppage of bunker tanker crew changes at Singapore port effective 7 January.

“Certain crew onboard bunker tankers have licenses that need to be renewed and they have to go back to their country of origin to conduct this administrative task,” he says.

“Let’s say a marine engineer has to go back to his country for renewal of license and the bunkering employer has arranged for this. Now with the block of crew change, the marine engineer has an expired license and is stuck operating onboard the bunker tanker; does this mean the manning requirement is still being met?

“Also, it seems bunkering firms are unable to use local Singapore engineers to fill in for marine engineers with expiring licenses due to the stoppage of crew change. With such restrictions, does this mean the bunker tankers can temporarily operate even though licenses onboard have expire? It seems all these questions have not been answered.”

The latest Covid-19 measures also introduced a host of other issues for bunker cargo loading operations at terminals, shares Neo.

“Terminal personnel such as Loading Masters, Cargo Inspectors and the Mooring Gang [to connect the loading arm to the bunker tanker inlet manifold] have to jump from ship to ship, including oceangoing ships and bunker tankers, and communicate with crew and officers onboard as part of their jobs,” he says.

“Based on the present PMC No. 04 of 2021, all these cannot be done. I think the industry needs more clarity.”

Like the others interviewed by Manifold Times, Neo was supportive of the actions taken by MPA but believed more work needs to be done through engagement with the rest of the bunkering and surveying players.

“The bunkering and surveying sectors support the actions of the port authority, but the port authority needs to look at resolving certain operational issues and consult with them on how changes should be implemented,” he states.

“We also have to ensure that quarantine procedures are consistent and follow the Ministry of Health’s guidelines and requirements.”

Note from the Editor: PMC 04 was released on Thursday (14 January) and the industry interviews above were conducted between 18 to 19 January 2021. We believe the information provided is accurate in accordance to the dates before further announcements; Manifold Times is aware the relevant authorities are in the midst of taking action and it will only be a matter of time before the issues mentioned are completely resolved. #maritimesgsteadylah

 

Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 20 January, 2021

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

“Lucia Cosulich” enters final preparation ahead of bunkering operations

Following the delivery of the ship in China, it will now enter the final preparation phase ahead of its next operational steps, strengthening the Group’s ability to provide reliable bunkering solutions.

Admin

Published

on

By

“Lucia Cosulich” enters final preparation ahead of bunkering operations

Fratelli Cosulich Marine Energy on Thursday (2 July) celebrated the delivery of Lucia Cosulich at Taizhou Maple Leaf Shipyard in China.

The vessel is the second of four sister methanol-ready IMO II bunker tankers developed within the Group’s fleet expansion programme and follows the launching ceremony held on 2 May 2026.

Designed to support the Group’s bunkering operations and future fuel requirements, Lucia Cosulich is part of the new generation of vessels developed by Fratelli Cosulich Marine Energy to combine operational reliability, safety and fuel flexibility.

Lucia Cosulich will now enter the final preparation phase ahead of its next operational steps, further strengthening the Group’s ability to provide reliable bunkering solutions.

“We wish Lucia Cosulich and her crew fair winds on the next stage of her journey,” the company said. 

Related: Fratelli Cosulich launches second methanol-ready bunker tanker in China

 

Photo credit: Fratelli Cosulich
Published: 3 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Business

Glencore backs FincoEnergies’ biofuel growth with majority stake acquisition

With Glencore’s support, FincoEnergies is well positioned to continue expanding its offerings in biofuels across multiple transport segments and to increase its presence in new geographies.

Admin

Published

on

By

fincoenergies logo

Dutch biofuel supplier FincoEnergies on Thursday (2 July) announced the completion of global commodities trader Glencore’s acquisition of a majority stake in the company, forming a partnership with Coloured Finches.

FincoEnergies said its fuel distribution and logistics infrastructure, customer relationships and expertise in downstream fuel transportation will be complemented by Glencore’s global scale, sourcing capabilities and experience across the energy value chain.

With Glencore’s support, FincoEnergies added it is well positioned to continue expanding its offerings in biofuels and decarbonisation solutions across multiple transport segments and to increase its presence in new geographies.

Jan-Willem van der Velden, FincoEnergies CEO and Founder, said: “Today marks an exciting next step for FincoEnergies. Glencore already knows our business well, and this builds on years of collaboration, trust and shared ambition. With Glencore’s support and global reach behind us, we are in a strong position to continue growing our business and supporting our customers as demand for lower-carbon fuel solutions continues to evolve.”

Maxim Kolupaev, Head of Glencore Energy UK, said: “Glencore’s investment in FincoEnergies strengthens the presence of our business in Northwest Europe and creates a strong platform for future growth. We are looking forward to continuing to work closely with the FincoEnergies team and building on the successful relationship we have already developed together.”

Manifold Times previously reported FincoEnergies signing an agreement with Glencore for the acquisition of a majority shareholding in the FincoEnergies Group in a partnership with Coloured Finches.

Related: Glencore acquires majority stake in Dutch biofuel supplier FincoEnergies

 

Photo credit: FincoEnergies
Published: 3 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders down 11.6% in H1 2026

In total, 137 alternative-fuelled vessels were ordered in the first half of 2026 compared to 155 in the same period in 2025.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders down 11.6% in H1 2026

Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform showed a total of 15 new orders for alternative-fuelled vessels were placed in June 2026.

This consisted of 10 orders for LNG-fuelled vessels, nine of which were car carriers and one a CO2 carrier. The remaining five orders were for LPG/ethane carriers.

Two LNG-bunker vessels were also ordered in June, bringing the total in this segment to seven so far in 2026.

In total, 137 alternative-fuelled vessels were ordered in the first half of 2026, down 11.6% from 155 in the same period in 2025. 

Over half of these (73) were for LNG-fuelled vessels, with most coming from the container (42) and car carrier (21) segments. LPG/ethane carriers were also prominent, with 55 new orders, a significant uptick compared to the first half of 2025 (15). The remaining orders were for vessels fuelled by methanol (2), ethanol (2), ammonia (4), and hydrogen (1).

Deliveries in the first half of the year point to continued uptake of alternative-fuelled tonnage across several segments, with 61 LNG-fuelled vessels and 38 methanol-fuelled vessels delivered so far in 2026.

More recently, Exmar took delivery of what it described as the first oceangoing dual-fuel ammonia vessel, marking a step beyond earlier ammonia-fuelled deliveries, which have largely been associated with pilot or demonstration projects rather than commercial deployment.

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders down 11.6% in H1 2026

Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “What we can take away from the first half of 2026, in terms of the alternative-fuels orderbook, is that we have a market progressing at different speeds depending on segment economics, fuel availability, and the regulatory landscape. Shipowners and other stakeholders are pursuing different pathways based on their individual priorities and requirements.

“LNG remains the leading near-term fuel option, with order activity continuing to be led by containers and car carriers. LPG and ethane carriers have also accounted for a significant share of activity in the first half of the year, while developments in areas such as ammonia and ethanol show that multiple pathways continue to be explored.”

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 3 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending