Pacific Green Technologies highlights LSFO as ‘GHG timebomb’
Scrubber technology firm Pacific Green Technologies (PGT) on Thursday (10 February) published the following article outlining reasons why gas scrubbers are better for the environment than burning low sulphur fuel oil:
On 1 January 2020, the maritime industry changed tack.
To comply with IMO 2020, most of the world’s shipping fleet switched from high sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) to low sulphur fuel oil (LSFO).
After decades of use, HSFO was effectively banned, though an exception was made for shipowners who chose to fit an exhaust gas cleaning system, or marine gas scrubber.
This last decision could have been one of the best the IMO made in the process of establishing new sulphur oxide (SOx) emissions targets.
Contrary to the hysteria calling for the total elimination of heavy fuel oil from the global marine energy mix, the combination of HSFO and a scrubber continues to gain credibility as the most environmentally sound response to satisfying new greenhouse gas (GHG) limitations.
The motivation for the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO’s) new regulation was a need to lower the sulphur content of marine fuel to 0.5% or below.
But, as more scientific evidence emerges, it seems there may have been gaps in the IMO’s thinking. Perhaps insufficient consideration was given to the full environmental impact of burning LSFO.
Gas scrubbers are better for the environment
Low sulphur fuels contain lower levels of SOx and nitrogen oxides (NOx) than HSFO.
However, research recently submitted to the IMO by Germany and Finland confirms that the overall effect of burning LSFO is environmentally negative.
Very low sulphur fuel oil was only developed recently in order to create a fuel that would comply with the IMO’s 2020 SOx requirements. It has not had widespread use for a prolonged period of time.
It is not fully understood.
The Finnish/German paper details the results from controlled burnings of various marine fuels, and blended LSFO showed a marked increase in black carbon emissions.
Second only to CO2 in terms of the maritime industry’s contribution to climate change, black carbon is a dangerous greenhouse gas. It is responsible for 7% to 21% of shipping’s overall GHG equivalent impact.
Despite the IMO’s proposed commitment to reducing carbon emissions – the organization has set an ambitious target of halving maritime production of GHG by 2050 – the explosion in LSFO use could spell disaster for its air pollution negation strategy.
Environmental pressure groups have taken notice.
Dr Sian Prior, Lead Advisor to the Clean Arctic Alliance, views the use of LSFO as a significant risk.
“If immediate action isn’t taken by the International Maritime Organization, the shipping industry’s use of VLSFO – introduced to comply with the 2020 sulphur cap – will lead to a massive increase in black carbon emissions, and this will both accelerate the melting of Arctic sea ice and have a major impact on Earth’s climate,”
Seas at Risk, a coalition of European NGOs focused on the protection of marine ecosystems, has also voiced alarm. John Maggs is a Senior Policy Advisor for the group:
“There are serious questions to be answered about how these blended super pollutant ‘Frankenstein’ fuels ever came to market, especially as the IMO has spent almost a decade considering how to reduce black carbon emissions from shipping.”
The recent study found that “new blends of marine fuels with 0.50% sulphur content can contain a large percentage of aromatic compounds which have a direct impact on black carbon emissions”, and “demonstrated that the combustion of fuels with higher aromatic content emits higher concentrations of black carbon.”
Thanks to the fuel price spreads, scrubbers save money too
When burnt, LSFO blends showed a 10% to 85% increase in black carbon emissions compared to heavy fuel oil, and between 67% to 145% increase when compared to marine-quality distillate fuel.
Distillate fuels, however, have their own questionable carbon record.
A study published last year by the independent Norwegian research organization, SINTEF, considered the full lifecycle of marine fuel production. It found that the global production of LSFO emits far more GHG than the production of HSFO.
In the report, SINTEF’S Chief Scientist, Dr Elizabeth Lindstad, concludes that, measured from well to wake, using HSFO with an exhaust gas cleaning system (marine gas scrubber) was the most environmentally beneficial way of meeting IMO 2020 requirements.
Her views are corroborated by the findings in Germany and Finland’s latest paper, which has been submitted for discussion at the next meeting of the IMO’s Sub-Committee On Pollution Prevention And Response (PPR7).
The submission includes a call to phase out fuels with high black carbon emissions.
Shipowners who have fitted their vessels with scrubbers may have a wry smile at this proposal.
They will be comfortable in the knowledge that, despite burning high sulphur fuel oil, their ships emit cleaner exhaust gases than the thousands of vessels using LSFO.
And, thanks to the fuel price spreads, they’re saving money too.
Photo credit: Cyprien Hauser
Published: 11 February, 2020
Taiwan applies for tougher restrictions on bunker, aviation, and land-based fuels
0.5% sulphur cap will apply for Taiwanese international and domestic vessels by 1 July 2020, even though it is not a member of the IMO, states government.
Taiwan’s efforts to apply 0.5% sulphur cap at commercial ports prove effective
Taiwan first started implementing the sulphur cap in 2018 and even offered a subsidy to those who wish to switch to compliant fuel; SOx emissions have since reduced by 40%.
EU transport ministers back lower emissions for shipping sector
Declaration targeting a ‘carbon-neutral and zero pollution’ maritime sector was signed in an informal meeting; draft to be presented at next full council meeting.
Cargill and partners launch maritime decarbonisation program in Singapore
With ten other industry leaders, it aims to unite startups and industry players to test transformational technologies that reduce CO2 emissions.
IBIA: Call for IMO database on local and regional EGCS discharge restrictions
‘The database would presumably be managed by the IMO,requiring all members to report on specific restrictions in ports and waters under their jurisdiction,’ says IBIA Director.
IBIA statement on EGCS discussion at IMO’s PPR meeting: Avoid confirmation bias
IBIA urges IMO to avoid implementing a ‘one size fits all’ policy for EGCS emission guidelines by requiring relevant evaluations and scientific backings from specific areas.
Wärtsilä: Long live the internal combustion engine
‘What strikes us is that the combustion engine is extremely fuel flexible and only minor changes are needed to adapt it to new fuels,’ says Wärtsilä manager.
Geospock: Mapping maritime’s journey to zero-carbon with big data
‘Maritime has the opportunity to tackle sustainability by embracing data and developing a hub for maritime intelligence,’ says Maritime Business Development Manager.
EU funding boosts vessel fuel efficiency mission of SeaTech consortium
Developing ultra-high energy conversion and renewable energy propulsion to lower emissions and bunker costs.
ICS reminder: Ships can be detained under IMO 2020 rule from 1 March
Major port state regimes have already made clear they will rigorously enforce sulphur requirements, says ICS.
IBIA: Update on IMO Arctic HFO usage and carriage ban
IMO’s PPR Sub Committee to amend July 2024 usage and carriage ban, with caveat to extend usage for domestic shipping.
IMO: Strategies to meet GHG strategy discussed at Sweden meeting
Expert workshop held at World Maritime University, jointly organised with International Transport Forum and Nordic Energy Research.
Clean Arctic Alliance highlights loophole in HFO draft regulation as ‘outrageous’
Alliance calls for IMO to remove loopholes in draft regulation which leave the Arctic exposed to HFO for another decade until July 2029.
IMO calls for ‘urgent need’ to reduce GHG emissions from shipping
GHG reduction requires ‘new zero-carbon marine fuels or propulsion technologies,’ says Kitack Lim.
BIMCO joins Japan on proposal to regulate carbon intensity of existing ships
Package of amendments to environmental guidelines has been submitted to the working group on GHG reductions.
ECSA publishes position paper in response to EU Green Deal
Welcomes EU climate change ambition by outlining eight points where it can work with the shipping industry.
Clean Arctic Alliance welcomes Canada’s backing of heavy fuel oil ban
IMO must ‘not entertain any arguments calling for a delay or exemptions’ in implementation of Arctic HFO ban, says Dr Sian Prior.
Rotterdam in partnership to build battery/hydrogen fuel infrastructure
Forms agreement with E.ON and DeltaPort to implement battery container or hydrogen refuelling services in pilot project at Wesel.
IMO PPR committee to finalise verification guidelines for fuel oil carriage ban
Sub-committee will also revise 2015 Guidelines for scrubbers; develop measures to protect the arctic environment; and more.
Clean Arctic Alliance: Will London shipping summit act to protect Arctic from spills and emissions?
Clean Arctic Alliance reiterates its request for the IMO to urgently require all ships operating in the Arctic to switch to distillate fuels, in order to significantly reduce black carbon emissions.
DNV GL on HSFO carriage ban: Compliance is the only option
HSFO carriage ban effective from 1 March is an attempt to ensure transparency and that ships are not unjustly penalised.
Clean Arctic Alliance urges industry to reduce black carbon emissions
Dr. Prior names several other platforms for debate, but highlights main issue is the urgent need for IMO members to increase efforts to reduce black carbon emissions.
ABS and ClassNK grant AiP to Kawasaki Heavy Industries for LPG marine fuel design
‘LNG as fuel is attracting widespread attention as an environmentally friendly option, but LPG as fuel has advantages over LNG,’ says ABS spokesman.
IBIA replies to Clean Arctic Alliance in open letter on black carbon emissions
Suggests upcoming IMO Pollution Prevention and Response Sub-Committee to be ‘the most effective forum’ to progress Dr Prior’s debate.
Ammonia as carbon neutral fuel has high commercialising probability, says Korean Register
KR issues ‘Forecasting the alternative marine fuel: Ammonia’ technical information; comparing different types of carbon-neutral alternative fuels.
ICCT analysis points to ‘damning climate indictment of LNG as marine fuel’, says Stand.earth
ICCT report indicates the predominantly-methane-based LNG marine fuel traps 86 times more heat in the atmosphere than the same amount of CO2 over a 20-year time period.
Clean Arctic Alliance urges IMO to prohibit ‘super pollutant’ VLSFO and LSHFO
VLSFO and LSHFO usage will contribute to a massive increase of Black Carbon emissions which represent 7% to 21% of shipping’s overall GHG equivalent impact on the climate.
IMO 2020 regulation could have negative health and climate impacts, says research author
Dr Daniel Lack says cost-cutting group of oil refiners using residual fuel blends could send ship-source black carbon emissions soaring overnight.
China MSA publishes Guidance for Supervision and Management of Air Emissions from Ships
The Standard Club provides a summary of key points for IMO 2020 enforcement in Chinese waters by local port state authorities.
Global Maritime Forum: Approximately USD 1-1.4 trillion needed to achieve IMO 2050
Significant investments needed to decarbonise shipping can only be expected to happen if there is a long term commercially viable business case.
Safe Bulkers extends scrubber partnership with Alfa Laval through service agreement
‘The Alfa Laval Service Agreement will help us safeguard long-term performance, for example by using data analysis to keep systems performing at their peak,’ says Dr. Loukas Barmparis.
ABB presents recommendation for zero-emission marine technology to US Congress
‘ABB encourages the Subcommittee to set an ambitious, long-term national plan to achieve zero emissions for all vessels under its operation,’ says Peter Bryn.
BIMCO ‘concerned’ by EC intent to include international shipping in ETS
Very practical reasons for not taxing marine fuels as ships would simply bunker outside the EU, it says.
T&E analysis of MSC shipping GHG emissions in EU is inaccurate, it says
MSC clarifies only 40-45% of the 11 million mt of emissions were actually in the EU, unlike what T&E stated.
Debunkering of marine fuel from wrecked “Golden Ray” completed
More than 320,000 gallons of oil and water mixture removed from 26 fuel tanks inside the car carrier.
Environment group adds MSC to list of top 10 EU GHG emitters in 2018
The maritime sector is exempt under EU law from paying tax on its fuel, a subsidy worth €24 billion a year.
Port of Qinhuangdao issues incentives to vessels using low sulphur fuels
Priority given to the ships using 0.1% sulphur limit fuel oil to load and unload, and depart from the port.
Thai space agency detects 20,000 litre bunker spill from sunken tanker
Golden Bridge 2 had about 104,000 litres of bunkers onboard when it sank at Chao Phraya River on Tuesday.
Singapore Green Ship Programme, Green Port Programme extended
Singapore programmes to benefit environmentally friendly ocean-going and domestic commercial vessels.
ECSA rectifies Clean Shipping Coalition statement on ‘slow’ IMO talks
‘IMO Intersessional Working Group was good and fruitful preparatory work,’ it states in response to CSC.
IMO talks in ‘slow lane’ over speed reduction measures, says T&E
Proposed measure to certify ships that limit engine power ‘unambitious, opaque, and susceptible to cheating’.
IMO makes ‘positive progress’ in goal-based emissions reduction approach
There was no appetite for a prescriptive speed reduction regulation, says the UK Chamber of Shipping.
IMO pushes forward with work to meet ship emission reduction targets
IMO shares summary of Intersessional Working Group on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships meeting.
Vitol Group acquires Sinanju Tankers Holdings; gains foothold in Singapore bunker ops
The Singapore Bunkering license holding entity has been renamed Vitol Bunkers (S) Pte Ltd and from 1 April 2020 all bunker deliveries will be carried out by Vitol Bunkers (S) Pte Ltd.
PMI Trading responds to Nustar Energy over alleged off-spec bunker fuel supply at Houston
Seeks to enforce either arbitration clause under contract or to dismiss NuStar and TPP respective liability claims, according to documents obtained by Manifold Times.
‘Minimal disruption’ to Singapore bunkering operations despite COVID-19, confirms MPA
‘We are closely monitoring the rapidly developing COVID-2019 situation while remaining committed to working with the bunkering industry to ensure minimal disruption to bunkering operations and services.’
Photo Essay: “Marine Vicky” in multi-agency emergency preparedness exercise at Singapore port
The emergency preparedness exercise involving SCDF, PCG, MPA, and Sinanju was carried out on the LNG dual-fuel bunker tanker at Raffles Anchorage on 17 March, learned Manifold Times.
Singapore bunker players continue Business Continuity Plans in response to COVID-19
Manifold Times checks along the bunker supply chain on how various companies are managing operations after the republic entered DORSCON Orange in response to COVID-19.
Survey: Singapore physical bunker players not as widely hit, despite fall in crude oil prices
Manifold Times checks with industry players on how the recent sharp fall in crude oil prices have affected each node along the marine fuels supply chain in Singapore.