The North P&I Club on Monday presented the following list of ports banning scrubber discharges in their waters:
Exhaust gas cleaning systems (EGCS) – more commonly referred to as scrubbers – are an accepted equivalent measure in complying with the IMO 2020 global sulphur cap. The use of scrubbers has split the shipping industry. Ports around the world are looking at the impact of scrubber use in their waters.
A number of ports and regions have already stated that they will not allow the discharge of washwater from scrubbers.
The table below summarises North’s understanding of the positions taken by ports that have or will prohibit the use of scrubbers, or have placed conditions on their use.
This information is to the best of our knowledge and is for guidance only. For up to date and definitive information, contact the local authorities or agents.
|Country||Port||EGCS discharge allowed?||Comments|
|Belgium||All||No||Belgian federal law states discharge only allowed in coastal and open seawaters when at least 3nm off coast
Discharges must not imperil EU Water Framework Directive objectives.
Flemish regional law also confirms discharge not allowed in ports or inland waters.
|Germany||Inland Waterways , canals and ports within inland waterways||No||See the Convention on the Collection, Deposit and Reception of Waste Produced during Navigation on the Rhine and Inland Waterways (CDNI)
|Ireland||Dublin||No||Refer to Port of Dublin's NOTICE TO MARINERS No. 37 of 2018 Prohibition on the Discharge of Exhaust Gas Scrubber Wash Water
|Latvia||All Ports||Conflicting advice||EUROPEAN COMMISSION REPORT (2016): Allowed – no restrictions, but national authorities are of the position that open-loop scrubber discharge should be prohibited in territorial waters and ports
ABS Report (2018): Prohibited in port waters
Correspondents Pandi Balt Ltd advised in August 2018 that washwater discharges currently allowed under regulations but likely to be prohibited in future
|Lithuania||All Ports||Conflicting advice||EUROPEAN COMMISSION REPORT (2016): Allowed – no restrictions (in accordance with IMO Washwater Guidelines MEPC 184(59)).
ABS Report (2018): Prohibited in territorial waters and ports
We understand Lithuanian authorities are studying whether EGCS wash water discharges have serious impacts on the marine environment or not. When results will be clear, conclusions will be provided.
|United States||Californian Ports and Waters||No||The Californian ARB OGV regulations stipulate only distillate fuels can be used to comply with the 0.1% sulphur limit Changeover to compliant distillate fuel (MGO or MDO) prior to entering Californian waters|
|United States||Connecticut Ports and Waters||No||Discharge of exhaust gas scrubber washwater into Connecticut waters from any vessel is prohibited
VGP 2013: 6.5.9 Discharge of exhaust gas scrubber washwater into Connecticut waters from any vessel covered under the VGP or sVGP is prohibited.
This condition is necessary for compliance with CGS section 22a-427, Standards No.1, 2, 9, 12, 14, 15, and 24 of the CT WQS.
|United States||Hawaii Ports and Waters||Yes – conditional||Additional requirements under VGP 2013 Section 6.6.
The State of Hawaii (Clean Water Branch) issued 'Blanket Section 401' Water Quality Criteria (WQC). This covers 27 categories of effluent discharge from an applicable vessel (EGCS washwater being one) that have received the best control or treatment into waters of the State of Hawaii incidental to the normal operation of the applicable vessels
|United Arab Emirates||Abu Dhabi Ports||Yes – conditional||Abu Dhabi Ports Company Policy: Sludge generated from exhaust gas scrubber washwater discharge must not be discharged into port waters. Exhaust gas scrubber washwater discharge may only be discharged in port waters if free from pollutants. Any exhaust gas scrubber sludge should be discharged from a vessel to an ADPC licensed waste disposal contractor
|Singapore||Singapore||No||Ban on the use of open loop scrubbers expected to take effect on 1 January 2020|
Source: The North P&I Club
Published: 4 December, 2018
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.
‘We [Consort Bunkers] have the opinion that the bunker business in Singapore is not related to the widely reported earlier cargo commodity trading mishaps,’ company source tells Manifold Times.