It is inadvisable to depend on using the Rights of Retention clause in contracts to claim back bunkers in the event of a dispute, says the Senior Partner of Singapore-based legal firm JTJB LLP.
“A clear point from the OW Bunker debacle is the bunker suppliers right of retention to title claims, which is generally found in all standard terms and conditions,” Danny Chua told delegates at the IBIA Asia Bunker Symposium.
“It is very clear in the OW bunker case that bunkers supplied are meant to be consumed and therefore retention of title clause is generally quite useless.
“This is because by the time you want to effect any recovery of your bunkers on board they will either have been co-mingled with other marine fuel or have already been consumed.
“So therefore that clause is only good in theory.”
A bunkering firm encounters the same amount of credit risk when dealing with shipowners, operators or charterers and cannot arrest a vessel when dealing with an intermediary.
The only answer for a bunkering firm wishing to insulate its credit risk is to seek insurance, recommends Chua.
“From the experience of the OW bunker demise, not many creditors here had taken out credit insurance and this was sad because a lot of the victims in the OW bunker collapse were physical suppliers,” he says.
“Nowadays, each stem runs into at least a million dollars. It is a fair bit of debt to recover and if you do not have credit risk insurance you are really out on a limb.”
The IBIA Asia Bunker Symposium is held as part of Asia Pacific Maritime 2018.
Photo credit: Nadiah Zulkifle, IBIA (Asia)
Published: 16 March, 2018
Copies of the notice of the meeting on 5 August have been circulated to the contributories and creditors of the Company by post and/ or email.
Authorities made a record of administrative violations and escorted the fishing vessel to Vung Tau city for further investigations, according to the Vietnamese authority.
Covers a range of illicit activities including illegal oil bunkering, crude oil theft, piracy, and more.
Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services, Oldendorff Carriers, Lloyd’s Register and organisers took part in a Bunker Quality Claims Webinar moderated by Manifold Times on 10 November.
Vessel TG 90659 TS was found to be behaving suspiciously by the patrol team of Region 4 Command at about 0920 am on Tuesday (7 April).
Mismanagement would have been detected much earlier if Deloitte auditors ‘carried out the audits of the plaintiff's financial statements properly’.
Glander International Bunkering (Norway) AS seeking payment of USD 115,963.52 (not including contractual compensation and interests) from the vessel’s demise charterer, according to court documents.
“In TotalEnergies, we already have projects along the e-Fuel value chain, from green electricity and green / blue hydrogen to e-Fuel production that will be integrated along the marine fuels value chain in time to come,” shares Louise Tricoire.
Buyers can nominate deliveries on platform and plan operations together with suppliers following ‘one single truth’ concept with all players aware of what has been agreed when and by whom, says DNV spokesman.
Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.
Cost of alternative bunker fuels, bunker operations and technology advancement are some considerations to be examined by the maritime industry, says Neo, director of SDE International Pte Ltd.
Kim Hyung Joon and Han Donghoon were planning to join the Singapore entities of Hartree Group - either Hartree Partners Singapore Pte Ltd or Hartree Marine Fuels - in October, discovered management.
