It is inadvisable to depend on using the Rights of Retention clause in contracts to claim back bunkers in the event of a dispute, says the Senior Partner of Singapore-based legal firm JTJB LLP.
“A clear point from the OW Bunker debacle is the bunker suppliers right of retention to title claims, which is generally found in all standard terms and conditions,” Danny Chua told delegates at the IBIA Asia Bunker Symposium.
“It is very clear in the OW bunker case that bunkers supplied are meant to be consumed and therefore retention of title clause is generally quite useless.
“This is because by the time you want to effect any recovery of your bunkers on board they will either have been co-mingled with other marine fuel or have already been consumed.
“So therefore that clause is only good in theory.”
A bunkering firm encounters the same amount of credit risk when dealing with shipowners, operators or charterers and cannot arrest a vessel when dealing with an intermediary.
The only answer for a bunkering firm wishing to insulate its credit risk is to seek insurance, recommends Chua.
“From the experience of the OW bunker demise, not many creditors here had taken out credit insurance and this was sad because a lot of the victims in the OW bunker collapse were physical suppliers,” he says.
“Nowadays, each stem runs into at least a million dollars. It is a fair bit of debt to recover and if you do not have credit risk insurance you are really out on a limb.”
The IBIA Asia Bunker Symposium is held as part of Asia Pacific Maritime 2018.
Photo credit: Nadiah Zulkifle, IBIA (Asia)
Published: 16 March, 2018
The EFCC filed an application to arrest the MD for failing to appear three times to provide his testimony in a fraud investigation worth USD 213 million, reports Bloomberg.
Dan-Bunkering's management hopes for a quick conclusion after eight Danish authorities investigates alleged irregularities in 2015-2017, states official response.
‘The total amount of gratification involved is the highest ever in a local corruption case and there was a sustained period of offending,’ said CPIB DPP at the State Courts of Singapore.
Mok’s offence affected public confidence in the use of the MFM system onboard Singapore bunker tankers, and caused an embarrassment to the MPA, said Deputy Public Prosecutors.
Fines for shipping companies to start from SEK 5,000, reaching a maximum of SEK $1 million.
New regulatory requirements for reporting ship energy consumption has taken effect, says West of England.
‘We are here to transfer the extremely valuable knowledge gained over the past six years to the maritime sector, such that our customers are comfortable in the use of such biofuels,’ states CEO Olivier Baiwir.
Newly appointed Anthony Mollet speaks to Manifold Times about his role, vision, value proposition and plans for the Marine Fuels Alliance to become a wide-reaching and engaging bunkering industry association.
SFP will be retrofitting VPT’s existing bunker vessel with its Full Electric Ready (FER) system and seeks to commission the vessel in the second quarter of 2022, CEO of SFP George Lee tells Manifold Times.
Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services, Oldendorff Carriers, Lloyd’s Register and organisers took part in a Bunker Quality Claims Webinar moderated by Manifold Times on 10 November.
‘Though it did introduce temporary commercial and operational disruptions, we took a constructive view of the situation and chose to use this event as a learning opportunity,’ shares a Consort Bunkers spokesperson.
Gealubes Consulting & Trading, the authorised marine business distributor of PANOLIN EALs at Singapore port, shares a two-part education series on Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants on Manifold Times.
30 Nov 2021
