It is inadvisable to depend on using the Rights of Retention clause in contracts to claim back bunkers in the event of a dispute, says the Senior Partner of Singapore-based legal firm JTJB LLP.
“A clear point from the OW Bunker debacle is the bunker suppliers right of retention to title claims, which is generally found in all standard terms and conditions,” Danny Chua told delegates at the IBIA Asia Bunker Symposium.
“It is very clear in the OW bunker case that bunkers supplied are meant to be consumed and therefore retention of title clause is generally quite useless.
“This is because by the time you want to effect any recovery of your bunkers on board they will either have been co-mingled with other marine fuel or have already been consumed.
“So therefore that clause is only good in theory.”
A bunkering firm encounters the same amount of credit risk when dealing with shipowners, operators or charterers and cannot arrest a vessel when dealing with an intermediary.
The only answer for a bunkering firm wishing to insulate its credit risk is to seek insurance, recommends Chua.
“From the experience of the OW bunker demise, not many creditors here had taken out credit insurance and this was sad because a lot of the victims in the OW bunker collapse were physical suppliers,” he says.
“Nowadays, each stem runs into at least a million dollars. It is a fair bit of debt to recover and if you do not have credit risk insurance you are really out on a limb.”
The IBIA Asia Bunker Symposium is held as part of Asia Pacific Maritime 2018.
Photo credit: Nadiah Zulkifle, IBIA (Asia)
Published: 16 March, 2018
Tugboat crew was caught buying bunker fuel from a Singapore-registered tanker.
Credit Suisse Singapore applied for the vessel sale in August, and anyone with a claim against the vessel should contest within 90 days of the payment.
Changes took effect from 19 December 2018 at 0001 hours, according to Port Marine Circular No.10 of 2018.
The Constanta Tribunal on 27 February 2019 approved the application for detention at Constanta port.
5,869 dwt vessel was involved in an alleged unauthorised anchoring incident in the East Johor Sea on Monday.
OFAC placed Maritime Assistance LLC and five vessels under sanctions after co-investigation with the FBI.
Octamar™ Ultra HF, Octamar™ Complete, and Octamar™ F35C were found to have improved the fuel economy while reducing exhaust gas and other emissions of marine engines in a series of trials, states report.
Disposal of evidence has resulted in Singapore not being able to provide full details to the United Nationals Panel of Experts which sought information regarding the case, says Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
‘We are proud to be amongst the first to show the successful steps taken by Singapore’s bunkering ecosystem to remain forward thinking and relevant,’ Choong Sheen Mao, Director of EMF, tells Manifold Times.
‘With the launch of a common data infrastructure, Kenoil aims to continue achieving an end to end visibility and transparency on the bunker data supply chain,’ states Kenoil Managing Director.
Digitalization can help shipping achieve its decarbonization goals but only if human factors are considered enough when introducing smarter maritime operations with ‘user-friendly’ technology.
Anand S/O Omprekas, Noruliman Bin Bakti, and Muhammad Khairul Asri Bin Mohamad Hanafiah were tasked to verify the quantity of cargo supplied to vessels by Shell Eastern Petroleum Private Limited.
