UK-based accounting firm Ernst & Young (EY), the court appointed interim judicial managers of Ocean Tankers Pte Ltd (OTPL), said that they have reason to doubt the authenticity of OTPL’s claim of exposure involving bills of lading (BL), reported The Business Times.
According to initial investigations by EY, the claims of nearly USD 1 billion involve at least 42 transactions reportedly issued by OTPL involving voyages that did not take place or did not correlate to relevant cargo for the named vessel.
EY’s findings also stated that it was not uncommon for the vessel operator to be unaware that the BL even existed.
OTPL had also allegedly grossly overstated its potential exposure claims in director Evan Lim Chee Ming’s affidavit where he said OTPL was exposed to USD 2.67 billion whereas EY found these claims amounted to USD 984 million.
EY also noticed transfers totalling USD 19 million to the Lim family classified as ‘repayment of shareholders’ loan’ timed right before OTPL was scheduled to be restructured.
Subsequently, EY has since issued letters to the Lim family requesting the sum be repaid to OTPL citing ‘unfair preferences’ as the amount was categorised under capital reserve in OTPL’s audited balance sheet ending 31 March, 2019.
Since then, EY has put forward two proposals to the Lim family on how to salvage and restructure OTPL and are waiting to gage their interest in the matter pending a meeting between the two parties this week.
Related: Judicial managers of Ocean Tankers to present restructuring proposals to owners
Related: Ocean Tankers: Notice to prove debt or claim published by interim judicial managers
Related: ‘Reasonable prospects’ to keep Ocean Tankers as a going concern, states Director
Related: Singapore: Ocean Tankers, a separate entity of Hin Leong, seeking judicial management
Related: Singapore High Court concedes interim judicial management to Hin Leong Trading
Related: Report: Hin Leong Trading appoints PwC as interim judicial manager
Related: Singapore’s Police Force commence investigations into Hin Leong Trading
Related: Sembcorp Cogen aborts gasoil supply and storage contract with Hin Leong Trading
Related: Winson Group and ZenRock Commodities reassure fiscal stability despite Hin Leong fiasco
Related: Report: Sinopec expresses interest in Hin Leong Trading stake of Universal Terminal
Related: Report: Hin Leong Trading founder gave instructions to hide USD 800 million losses
Related: Singapore: Ocean Bunkering Services to discontinue marine fuel deliveries
Related: Hin Leong in debt restructuring exercise; Ocean Tankers a separate entity, says CEO
Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 14 July, 2020
Garren Hay will be responsible for sales of the PANOLIN range of Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants for the Singapore sole distributor agent Gealubes Consulting & Trading Pte Ltd.
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.