Connect with us

Analysis

JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (June 2022)

China’s bonded bunker fuel sales moved lower to around 1.55 mln mt in June when most ports remained short of fuel, down 2.5% from May, JLC’s data shows.

Admin

Published

on

Screenshot 2022 07 13 at 11.15.42 AM

Beijing-based commodity market information provider JLC Network Technology Co. recently shared its JLC China Bunker monthly report for June 2022 with Manifold Times through an exclusive arrangement:

Bunker Fuel Demand

Bonded bunker fuel sales continue downtrend in June

China’s bonded bunker fuel sales still went downhill in June when most ports remained short of fuel. China’s bonded bunker fuel sales moved lower to around 1.55 mln mt in the month, down 2.5% from May, JLC’s data shows.

Chimbusco and Sinopec sold about 580,000 mt and 660,000 mt of bonded bunker fuel in June, JLC’s data indicates. Bonded bunker fuel sales for SinoBunker and China ChangJiang Bunker (Sinopec) were 65,000 mt and 35,000 mt, respectively. Around 193,800 mt of of sales were made by suppliers who held local licenses, with PetroChina accounting for 75,400 mt.

An insufficiency in supply still hampered bonded bunker fuel sales during the month, causing a drop-off in sales at ports including Zhoushan and Dalian. In addition, sky-high fuel oil prices and low freight rates also made the Southern barge market run tight, limiting the sales volume.

China’s bonded bunker fuel exports rallied in May amid increasing production of low-sulfur fuel oil (LSFO) and a new batch of LSFO quotas.

China’s bonded bunker fuel exports climbed to 1.48 million mt in May 2022, up 14.9% month on month but down 9.18% year on year, according to data from the General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China (GACC).

Among May’s exports were approximately 1.40 million mt of heavy bunker fuel and 72,900 mt of light MGO, accounting for 95.07% and 4.93% respectively.

State-owned enterprises exported about 1.26 million mt of bonded bunker fuel in the month, accounting for 85.37% of the total, while exports by independent enterprises settled at 216,100 mt, accounting for 14.63%.

Screenshot 2022 07 13 at 11.15.42 AM
Screenshot 2022 07 13 at 11.15.54 AM

Domestic bunker fuel demand holds steady in June

Domestic bunker fuel demand remained largely stable in June, owing to a mix of conditions when buyers raised their bids amid robust crude prices and tight supply but some ship owners suspended shipping due to high costs and excess shipping capacity.

The demand for domestic-trade heavy bunker fuel was around 320,000 mt in the month, growing by 10,000 mt or 3.23% month on month. Meanwhile, due to higher electricity consumption in the southern regions during hotter weather and more shipping of the fuel for power generation, demand for light bunker fuel increased by 10,000 mt, or 7.14%, to roughly 150,000 mt.

Bunker Fuel Supply

Bonded bunker fuel imports rise on stock shortage in May

China’s bonded bunker fuel imports saw a bounce in May as some Chinese bonded bunker suppliers were running out of their inventories.

The country imported about 354,200 mt of bonded bunker fuel in May 2022, rising 15.64% from a month before, according to the data from the General Administration of Customs of PRC (GACC).

Although the imported sources still lacked price advantages, some buyers had to purchase imported low-sulfur resources after using up their inventories as home-produced low-sulfur resources struggled to meet domestic demand. The supply of bonded bunker fuel was even suspended in certain places.

Despite a month-on-month rise, however, the arrivals of the imported bunker fuel were still relatively dull. On a year-on-year comparison, the bonded bunker fuel imports plunged 57.84% in May, GACC data shows.

Underlying the slump were steep import costs amid excessive freight rates for the cargoes and high premiums for imported bonded bunker fuel. In addition, the supply of low-sulfur fuel oil (LSFO) continued to tighten in Singapore and Malaysia, the two critical suppliers of LSFO to China, forcing most domestic buyers to give priority to domestic low-sulfur resources.

In terms of the source country, the UAE maintained its first place by exporting 202,800 mt of bonded bunker fuel to China, accounting for 57% of China’s total bonded bunker fuel imports. Malaysia climbed to the second place with 82,900 mt, accounting for 24%. The followings were Russia and South Korea, with 40,000 mt from Russia and 28,000 mt from South Korea, accounting for 11% and 8% respectively. The imports from Singapore tumbled to merely 500 mt, accounting for 0.14%.

Screenshot 2022 07 13 at 11.16.29 AM

Domestic blended bunker fuel supply remains in rise in June

Chinese blenders supplied around 380,000 mt of heavy bunker fuel in total in June 2022, a buildup of 50,000 mt or 15.15% from the previous month, JLC’s data shows. As for light bunker fuel, the domestic marine gas oil (MGO) supply stood at around 170,000 mt in the month, rising by 20,000 mt or 13.33% from May.

The blended bunker fuel supply expanded from the month before on the strength of improving demand following the easing of virus-related limitations and the increased restarts of refinery production in June.

In detail, the supply of low-sulfur asphalt had indeed shrunk, since profits from the coking and low-sulfur bonded bunker fuel sectors looked more encouraging. Meanwhile, available resources of shale oil and light coal tar were also under a cut during the month, albeit not a sharp one when market activity remained fair with blenders’ stable procurement. Going against the others, coal-based diesel supply was bumped up amid remarkable unit margins, by which a marked uplift was seen in the overall oil product output throughout the month.

Screenshot 2022 07 13 at 11.16.52 AM

Bunker Prices, Profits

Screenshot 2022 07 13 at 11.17.46 AM

Screenshot 2022 07 13 at 11.17.58 AM

Screenshot 2022 07 13 at 11.18.08 AM

Editor
Yvette Luo
+86-020-38834382
[email protected]

Sales (Beijing)
Tony Tang
+86-10-84428863
[email protected]

Sales (Singapore)
Ginny Teo
+65-31571254
[email protected]
[email protected]

JLC Network Technology Co., Ltd is recognized as the leading information provider in China. We specialized in providing the transparent, high-value, authoritative market intelligence and professional analysis in commodity market. Our expertise covers oil, gas, coal, chemical, plastic, rubber, fertilizer and metal industry, etc.

JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report is published by JLC Network Technology Co., Ltd every month on China bunker market, demand, supply, margin, freight index, forecast and so on. The report provides full-scale & concise insight into China bunker oil market.

All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be photocopied, reproduced, retransmitted, put into a computer system or otherwise redistributed without prior authorization from JLC.

Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (May 2022)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (April 2022)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (March 2022)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (February 2022)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (January 2022)

Note: China-based commodity market information provider JLC Technology has been providing Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times China bunker volume data since 2020. Data from that period is available here.

Photo credit: JLC Network Technology
Published: 13 July, 2022

Continue Reading

Research

Yamna identifies five potential global ammonia bunkering hubs

Unlike methanol, ammonia is not constrained by biogenic CO2 availability, and its production process is relatively simple.

Admin

Published

on

By

Yanma projected ammonia bunkering hubs

Specialised green hydrogen and derivatives platform Yamna in early December identified several potential ammonia bunkering hubs around the world.

The hubs are Port of Rotterdam, Port of Algeciras, Suez Canal, Jurong Port, and Port of Salalah.

“The shipping industry faces an ambitious challenge: reducing emissions by 20% by 2030 (compared to 2008 levels) and achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, in alignment with IMO targets,” it stated.

“Achieving these goals in the medium to long term depends on the adoption of alternative low-emission fuels like green ammonia and methanol.

“Among these, ammonia is attracting growing interest as a viable option. Unlike methanol, it is not constrained by biogenic CO2 availability, and its production process is relatively simple.”

However, the firm noted kickstarting ammonia bunkering on a large scale required four enablers to align:

  • Ammonia fuel supply
  • Application technology
  • Bunkering infrastructure
  • Safety guidelines and standards

It believed ammonia bunkering hubs will first emerge where affordable and scalable ammonia supply is available.

Yanma Why use ammonia for bunkering fuel

 

Photo credit: Yanma
Published: 31 December 2024

Continue Reading

Research

Port of Long Beach releases Clean Marine Fuels White Paper

Document intended to prepare and position the port and its stakeholder for adopting low carbon alternative fuels.

Admin

Published

on

By

Clean Marine Fuels Port of Long Beach (December 2024)

The Port of Long Beach (PLB) in late December released the Clean Marine Fuels White Paper as part of efforts to identify solutions capable of reducing emissions from ships.

“To understand the opportunities and challenges related to the adoption of clean marine fuels, the Port of Long Beach hired ICF Consulting to develop this white paper as an educational resource and guidance document,” stated PLB

“This document is also intended to prepare and position the port and its stakeholder for adopting low carbon alternative fuels.

“The white paper provides high level information on the array of currently available low carbon marine fuels, along with an exploration of the potential infrastructure needs for their deployment.”

The document covers the use of different types of clean bunker fuels such as green hydrogen, green methanol, green ammonia, renewable LNG and biofuels for shipping.

“The shift to clean marine fuels is no longer optional but a necessity for the sustainability of the maritime industry,” stated PLB in its closing remarks.

“This transition, while presenting challenges such as high costs, limited fuel availability, and the need for extensive infrastructure development, is advancing due to evolving policy frameworks and growing industry commitment.

“Addressing these obstacles will require targeted initiatives and robust collaboration between public and private sectors. Continued policy support, government funding, and sustained industry commitment will be essential to driving this progress and ensuring the long-term sustainability of maritime operations.”

Editor’s note: The 123-page Clean Marine Fuels White Paper may be downloaded from the hyperlink here.

 

Photo credit: Clean Marine Fuels White Paper
Published: 26 December 2024

Continue Reading

Port & Regulatory

Clyde & Co: FuelEU Maritime Series – Part 6: Legal issues

Bunker purchasers should consider the wording of their bunker supply contracts carefully and ensure that they are comfortable with the contractual provisions.

Admin

Published

on

By

CHUTTERSNAP MT

Global law firm Clyde & Co on Thursday (19 December) released the final instalment of its six-part series uncovering the FuelEU Maritime Regulation.

In it, the firm looked at the legal issues that could potentially arise between various parties, such as owners, charterers, ship managers, bunker suppliers, and ship builders, as a result of the compliance requirements imposed by the Regulation.

The following is an excerpt from the original article available here:

Bunker supply contracts - legal issues

Both vessel owners and bunker purchasers will want to ensure that they are able to take advantage of the preferential treatment provided under the FuelEU Regulation for consuming renewable fuels, including biofuels and renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBOs) (such as methanol and ammonia).

Article 10 of the FuelEU Regulation states that such fuels must be certified in accordance with the Renewable Energy Directive (RED) 2018/2001. If the fuel consumed by the vessel does not meet the applicable standards or have the appropriate certification, then it “shall be considered to have the same emissions factors as the least favourable fossil fuel pathway for that type of fuel[1].

In order to confirm that the fuel complies with greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity and sustainability requirements, the vessel owner and bunker purchaser will want to ensure that the bunker supplier provides the appropriate certification required under the FuelEU Regulation. The EU has required certification of such fuels, with the aim of guaranteeing “the environmental integrity of the renewable and low-carbon fuels that are expected to be deployed in the maritime sector.”[2]

The FuelEU Regulation provides that the GHG intensity of fuel is to be assessed on a “well-to-wake” basis, with emissions calculated for the entire lifespan of the fuel, from raw material extraction to storage, bunkering and then use on board the vessel.

Vessel owners and bunker purchasers will, therefore, need to be mindful of the importance of establishing how “green” the fuel actually is, and of the risk of bunker suppliers providing alternative fuels that will not allow for preferential treatment under the FuelEU Regulation.

It would, therefore, be advisable for bunker purchasers to consider whether the wording of their bunkering supply contracts is sufficient to ensure that the fuel is properly certified under the FuelEU Regulation. This could include contractual provisions that require the supplier (i) to provide a bunker delivery note (BDN), setting out the relevant information regarding the supply (such as the well-to-wake emission factor), and (ii) to provide the necessary certification under a scheme recognised by the EU.

Bunker purchasers should also be mindful that bunkering supply contracts often contain short claims notification time bars and provisions restricting claims for consequential loss. Issues could therefore arise where a purchaser tries to advance a claim against the supplier for consequential loss due to a lack of certification, but the bunker supplier argues that such losses are excluded under the terms of the bunker supply contract.

Bunker purchasers should therefore consider the wording of their bunker supply contracts carefully and ensure that they are comfortable with the contractual provisions.

 

Photo credit: CHUTTERSNAP from Unsplash
Published: 26 December 2024

Continue Reading
Advertisement
  • Aderco Manifold Website Advert EN
  • Consort advertisement v2
  • EMF banner 400x330 slogan
  • v4Helmsman Gif Banner 01
  • RE 05 Lighthouse GIF
  • SBF2
  • Sea Trader & Sea Splendor
  • Zhoushan Bunker

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS

  • HL 2022 adv v1
  • Singfar advertisement final
  • Triton Bunkering advertisement v2
  • MFT 25 01 E Marine Logo Animation
  • SEAOIL 3+5 GIF


  • Mokara Final
  • Auramarine 01
  • PSP Marine logo
  • Golden Island logo square
  • NW Logo advertisement
  • Trillion Energy
  • Synergy Asia Bunkering logo MT
  • Central Star logo
  • Energe Logo
  • Cathay Marine Fuel Oil Trading logo
  • Advert Shipping Manifold resized1
  • VPS 2021 advertisement
  • LabTechnic

Trending