Integr8 Fuels, the bunker trading and brokerage arm of Navig8, on Friday (29 May) published an article outlining the increasing importance of factoring bunkering lead times for different voyage requirements considering current market conditions that affect both HSFO and LSFO; it was written by Senior Research Analyst, Anton Shamray:
The key factors that are worth considering when buying bunker fuel are quality, availability and price. Excluding quality, availability and the relative price paid generally tend to correlate with the lead time, which is the difference between the enquiry/stem date and the start of the delivery window.
Following the IMO2020 transition, longer lead times have become key to securing bunker fuel while paying a competitive price. Shipowners who delay stemming risk non-availability and having to burn a more expensive compliant fuel instead. Book too early and potentially face cancellation costs or delays.
Comparing the lead time then and now
Lead time used to be somewhat less important prior to the IMO2020 switch, with plentiful HSFO availability globally. In most cases, the ability to stem HSFO as and when required meant that many stems were booked close to delivery.
Figure 1 shows the progression of the average lead time for HSFO and VLSFO, which started to increase mid-2019 and has now stabilised at a much higher level of around 8.5 days, up from 5 to 6 days in the previous years.
While HSFO is still relatively tight, VLSFO lead time may potentially start to decrease in the current well supplied market. And there is a human element too.
Figure 1. Average HSFO and VLSFO lead time of Integr8 Fuel stems, days
Some operators and buyers at times may have potentially faced non-availability earlier this year so buying strategies were adjusted to accommodate for longer lead times. Some of them would continue to habitually stem early despite the changing market dynamics so the industry may not get back to the shorter lead times seen previously.
With the change in the average lead time, the distribution by the lead time bracket has also changed. Having analysed over 5,000 stems, Figure 2 compares the shares of Integr8 Fuels HSFO and VLSFO stems by lead time in Jan-May 2019 and Jan-May 2020 respectively.
In Jan-May 2019, around 1 in 4 HSFO stems were booked two or less days in advance. With VLSFO only 1 in 6 stems are booked with such a short lead time.
The shape of the HSFO distribution was clearly skewed towards shorter lead times with few bookings over 9 days in advance. The VLSFO distribution is more even and, with 1 in 3 stems booked over 9 days in advance, there is a clear trend towards longer lead times.
Getting the lead time right
Getting the lead time right is very important. Short lead times risk non-availability or a relatively expensive price paid. While some may argue long lead times are always beneficial, these are also associated with risks.
One of these risks is the change in voyage orders, with vessels trading on the spot being particularly vulnerable. Should the destination port change, where bunkering has already been arranged, the owner risks racking up cancellation fees, unless a change of supply port has been agreed with the supplier where possible or the market moved up since fixing.
The other risk lies in facing unexpected bunkering delays due to congestion or bad weather, particularly for bunker-only calls. Both are very hard to predict over a week ahead and such delays can be very costly. Lastly, the vessel itself may arrive late at the bunkering port causing delays in bunker supply.
With all the benefits and risks in mind, based on the continuous market monitoring and the thousands of stems concluded, Integr8 Fuels currently estimate the optimal lead time on average of at least 6 days where possible for VLSFO and slightly longer for HSFO. Distillate only bookings can generally be concluded with much shorter lead times without any issues.
While the optimal lead time varies by vessel type, port and fuel, continuously monitoring these changes is now more important than ever given the new market realities and the many associated risks that can have an impact on PnL.
Photo credit and Source: Integr8 Fuels
Published: 1 June, 2020
Caroline Yang, President of SSA, addresses issues earlier raised by players; including PMC No. 04, the seven-day restriction, contactless bunkering, sampling point, hose connection, and more.
IBIA Asia, ABIS, sources from Singapore’s bunkering and surveying companies, and an industry veteran share with Manifold Times the issues expected from MPA’s latest Covid-19 measures.
The top three positive movers in the 2020 bunker supplier list are Hong Lam Fuels Pte Ltd (+13); Chevron Singapore Pte Ltd (+12); and SK Energy International (+8), according to MPA list.
‘We will operate in the Singapore bunkering market from the Tokyo, with support from local staff at Sumitomo Corporation Singapore,’ source tells Manifold Times.
Changes include abolishing advance declaration of bunkers as dangerous cargo, reducing pilotage fees on vessels receiving bunkers, and a ‘whitelist’ system for bunker tankers.
Claim relates to deliveries of MGO to the vessels Pacific Diligence, Pacific Valkyrie, Pacific Defiance, Crest Alpha 1, and Pacific Warlock between March 2020 to April 2020.