The following article discussing JVs between ship owners and commodity firms has been written by Victorian Green and Nick Purnell of international legal firm Clyde & Co; it has also been shared with Manifold Times:
The implementation on 1 January 2020 of the global sulphur cap on marine fuels is expected to give rise to potential opportunities and risks in relation to issues such as the availability of marine fuels, the quality of marine fuels, increased cost and availability of credit, and price volatility. In response to these issues, the Marine team at Clyde & Co is seeing an increased prevalence of joint ventures in the marine industry between ship owners and commodity traders, driven by a desire to utilise economies of scale, pool resources, and improve competitiveness.
We have also seen an increase in joint ventures established in the marine industry and bunker market to enable knowledge sharing between entities, both to enable one partner to enter a new geographical market as well as to enable a partner to expand its skills and experience in a market sector through a joint venture with an established supplier.
Whilst there are clear benefits to joint ventures, it is important to be cognisant of and protect against the risks when entering into such an arrangement. Building a successful joint venture arrangement requires clear agreement at the outset on the venture's objectives.
Key considerations include:
Consideration as to where to incorporate the joint venture company and which law should govern the transaction documents may be required. Given the international nature of the marine industry, decisions will be driven by matters such as each party's tax considerations, their own countries of incorporation/operations and the location of the joint venture's assets.
2. Control and Restrictions
How will the joint venture be managed on a day to day basis? Will the directors be prevented from undertaking certain activities without consent of both shareholders? There is a delicate balance to be struck between protecting shareholders through approval provisions whilst ensuring that the joint venture company operates efficiently without expending too much shareholder management time. Often forgotten too is the culture/management style of the joint venture company which needs to be carefully considered in order to ensure smooth integration and co-operation. Will the joint venture company be restricted from any activities? For example, the parties may wish to prevent the joint venture from directly competing in any way with its shareholders.
3. Contribution of Assets
What will each party bring to the table? Will this be tangible assets, cash, or otherwise? If one party's contribution is knowledge/experience, how can this be valued? Are there any implications of one party transferring knowledge or assets to the joint venture (for example, IP, or tax implications)?
How will the joint venture company be financed? If, as is common, in addition to each party's equity investment, third party debt is also required, consideration will need to be given to how security will be provided. This will generally be limited to the vessels themselves. If one or both parties are also to provide debt, discussions around how to protect that financing will be required, particularly where third party debt is also provided, which will generally have priority.
Joint venture partners will be required to share confidential information with each other in forming the joint venture. Each may discuss matters such as their financing arrangements, accounting positions and assets among other things. It is important to consider how to protect this confidentiality.
Key to the extraction of profits is the mechanism for how the joint venture company decides how and when any distributions will be paid. This requires discussion at the outset and a specified dividend procedure.
How and when will either party be permitted to sell its shares in the joint venture company? Will there be circumstances where either party will be forced to sell its shares in the joint venture company? Can one party buy out another company in certain circumstances and should the other party have a right of first refusal? Will a contributing party be entitled to have its contributed assets returned to it? Consideration of future scenarios should be given at the outset so as to account for the various exit routes with detailed exit and buyout procedures in the joint venture agreement.
Joint ventures provide clear benefits but require careful consideration of the various commercial and legal aspects to ensure that the agreements reflect each party's requirements and will last the course. With its market leading Marine team, specialism in the bunker market, and significant experience in international marine transactions, Clyde & Co is well placed to assist with the intricacies of joint ventures in a marine context.
Source: Clyde & Co
Published: 13 September, 2019
Garren Hay will be responsible for sales of the PANOLIN range of Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants for the Singapore sole distributor agent Gealubes Consulting & Trading Pte Ltd.
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.