Independent maritime research consultancy Drewry Tuesday launched its Cost Impact Calculator to help shippers prepare for and better understand fuel costs post-IMO 2020 in cooperation with both shipper members of the Drewry Benchmarking Club and other parties.
The Cost Impact Calculator is a new BAF formula and fuel cost benchmarking service to complement its existing range of ocean freight procurement support services.
“With the compliance window to the IMO’s low-sulphur rule change in January 2020 rapidly closing, our analysis of the topic has highlighted widespread unease and uncertainty among shippers,” said Philip Damas, Head of Drewry Supply Chain Advisors.
A recent survey of global shippers and freight forwarders conducted by Drewry found three quarters of respondents had yet to receive information from their carriers on how they planned to recover the fuel cost increases widely anticipated to accompany the regulatory change.
Over half of respondents did not consider their service providers’ existing approaches as either fair or transparent.
“These research findings are amplified by the complexity of the issues in play; the cost recovery models, the lack of cost transparency etc.,” added Philip Damas.
“Thorough preparation, information-sharing and changes to fuel charge contractual terms are now required.”
The new Cost Impact Calculator responds to these concerns through a new range of fuel cost verification services alongside Drewry's existing freight procurement and cost benchmarking products to help medium and larger Beneficial Cargo Owners (BCOs) better understand their fuel cost exposure and mitigate future cost increases.
Based on independent “futures” prices, low-sulphur marine fuel prices per tonne will be 55% higher than current high-sulphur fuels and Drewry considers that the probable “worst case” scenario is that fuel costs (paid by carriers) and fuel surcharges (paid by shippers) in global container shipping will increase by 55-60% in January 2020.
Drewry is currently working with other shipper groups to obtain more information on current versus the likely post-IMO fuel consumption mix. Further, the consultancy has already requested detailed fuel data and BAF policy information from several carriers.
Published: 17 October, 2018
‘The JMs have failed to discharge their duties by blindly helping the Banks mount a false case against the Defendant,’ wrote defence lawyers representing former IPP Director Dr Goh Jian Hian in court statement.
Lead prosecutor Andreas Myllerup Laursen aims for a fine and a prison sentence in the so-called Syria case scheduled to commence in Odense, Denmark on 26 October, writes the Danish publication.
In a modern re-telling of the story of David versus Goliath, local bunker barge owners/charterers successfully resisted claims brought in the Singapore courts by Phillips 66 for misdelivery of bunkers.
Bunker barge owners and operators; traders and suppliers; banks, including players in other countries, will have to re-examine respective operations, advises Helmsman Associate Director Jonathan Tan.
Vopak BL was a non-essential document with no contractual force and had no effect as a contract of carriage or as a document of title, states written Judgement issued by Singapore Court of Appeal.
Dwivedi Vivek Kumar ended his tenure as Global Head – Bitumen & Shipping & Regional Head – APAC at GP Global APAC on 10 November 2020 due to internal structuring of the GP Global Group.