Independent maritime research consultancy Drewry Tuesday launched its Cost Impact Calculator to help shippers prepare for and better understand fuel costs post-IMO 2020 in cooperation with both shipper members of the Drewry Benchmarking Club and other parties.
The Cost Impact Calculator is a new BAF formula and fuel cost benchmarking service to complement its existing range of ocean freight procurement support services.
“With the compliance window to the IMO’s low-sulphur rule change in January 2020 rapidly closing, our analysis of the topic has highlighted widespread unease and uncertainty among shippers,” said Philip Damas, Head of Drewry Supply Chain Advisors.
A recent survey of global shippers and freight forwarders conducted by Drewry found three quarters of respondents had yet to receive information from their carriers on how they planned to recover the fuel cost increases widely anticipated to accompany the regulatory change.
Over half of respondents did not consider their service providers’ existing approaches as either fair or transparent.
“These research findings are amplified by the complexity of the issues in play; the cost recovery models, the lack of cost transparency etc.,” added Philip Damas.
“Thorough preparation, information-sharing and changes to fuel charge contractual terms are now required.”
The new Cost Impact Calculator responds to these concerns through a new range of fuel cost verification services alongside Drewry's existing freight procurement and cost benchmarking products to help medium and larger Beneficial Cargo Owners (BCOs) better understand their fuel cost exposure and mitigate future cost increases.
Based on independent “futures” prices, low-sulphur marine fuel prices per tonne will be 55% higher than current high-sulphur fuels and Drewry considers that the probable “worst case” scenario is that fuel costs (paid by carriers) and fuel surcharges (paid by shippers) in global container shipping will increase by 55-60% in January 2020.
Drewry is currently working with other shipper groups to obtain more information on current versus the likely post-IMO fuel consumption mix. Further, the consultancy has already requested detailed fuel data and BAF policy information from several carriers.
Published: 17 October, 2018
‘This biofuel bunker delivery represents a new chapter for Eng Hua as we are now moving with the times towards the era of decarbonisation,’ Mike Sin, Director at Eng Hua, tells bunkering publication Manifold Times.
MPA has also asked Glencore to improve its internal procedures to ensure that prompt action is taken in future when it becomes aware of, or reasonably suspects, any irregularity in fuel quality, it states.
Dynamic Asset Investments Limited and Goldsland Holdings Co Ltd helped Vermont UM Bunkering maintain a “Cash Float” of about SGD 100,000 to facilitate “buyback” bunker transactions at Singapore port.
Senior Cargo Officer gained SGD 48,800 worth of commission from “buyback” bunker transactions and illegally obtained SGD 410,712.257 by cheating Vermont, a Singapore court heard on Thursday (21 July).
Firm hopes to leverage partnership in Greece as a springboard to expand into neighbouring and overseas markets including Europe and China, says Robin Van Elderen, Regional Head Bunkers, Europe, Sing Fuels.
Singapore can help less developed countries in SouthEast Asia through ‘piloting and scaling fuels and technology as well as a leading hub for green finance’, said DNV Group President and CEO Remi Eriksen.