The International Maritime Organization (IMO) rule to cap the limit of sulphur content in marine fuel from the current 3.5% to 0.5% from 2020 will cause ‘huge disruption’ for the shipping sector, says the head of the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) oil industry and market division, according to Reuters.
The development is caused by the shipping industry and oil refineries not doing enough to prepare for the change.
“The reality is that the industry has already passed the date beyond the smooth transition,” says Neil Atkinson at an Oslo energy seminar. “We don’t think it’s going to be a smooth transition.”
The change will cause in increase in demand for lower sulphur marine fuel, and a drop in high sulphur fuel oil demand by 2-3.5 million barrels per day (bpd).
Atkinson noted a lack of investment for scrubbers by shipowners and the IEA being concerned about the availability of low sulphur marine fuel for non-scrubber equipped vessels.
“There will be a scramble for new compliant fuel […] it could be a huge issue in terms of a spike in prices for marine fuel and a very, very disruptive market, and that’s only 18 months away,” he said.
Meanwhile, analysts at KBC noted approximately 40% of Middle Eastern and European oil refineries not ready for the new IMO rules as the 2020 deadline is now too close for new refinery upgrades to be ready in time.
“There is going to be a huge disruption in the shipping markets, particularly in those markets where (there) is rigorous enforcement,” Atkinson said.
Source: Reuters
Published: 19 April, 2018
ICS issues updated guidance to help shipowners comply with new UN IMO 2020 regulations.
Star Bulk expects average cost, including installation, to be below $2 million per vessel.
Firm creates webpage comprised of a fuel option evaluator and guidance documents for shipowners.
Shengli’s storage and transportation system have been adjusted to ensure the low-sulfur crude oil can be transported directly to the Dongying crude oil depot, it said.
Japanese engineering firm discusses LNG bunkering and why hybrid electric vessels may trend in shipping.
VLSFO was earlier alleged to cause an increase in black carbon emissions as it is more aromatic than HSFO - IBIA sheds light on such ‘unintended consequences’.
Buyers can nominate deliveries on platform and plan operations together with suppliers following ‘one single truth’ concept with all players aware of what has been agreed when and by whom, says DNV spokesman.
Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.
Cost of alternative bunker fuels, bunker operations and technology advancement are some considerations to be examined by the maritime industry, says Neo, director of SDE International Pte Ltd.
Kim Hyung Joon and Han Donghoon were planning to join the Singapore entities of Hartree Group - either Hartree Partners Singapore Pte Ltd or Hartree Marine Fuels - in October, discovered management.
‘When you think of Helmsman on the next occasion, think of us as lawyers with expertise in various fields. Come to us before a problem develops. It’s the process that matters,’ says Tang Chong Jun, Executive Director.
Bernard Chew was a former shareholder of MB Marine and was an authorised signatory of the company’s cheques at the material time, according to court documents obtained by Manifold Times.
