The International Chamber of Shipping, representing international trade associations BIMCO, ICS, INTERCARGO, INTERTANKO and WSC, is calling on member states of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to make progress on key challenges around the global sulphur cap to avoid compromising safety or unfairly penalising individual ships.
It notes there is ‘no transitional period’ for the use of 0.5% sulphur limit after 1 January 2020.
“But something of this magnitude has never previously been attempted before on a worldwide basis. The industry will do its utmost to be fully compliant to the extent that this is under its control,” it says.
“But safe and successful implementation will necessitate the supply of fuels, in ports around the world, which are compatible as well as legally compliant.
“With the scale of the technical challenges involved and the likelihood of teething problems, it will be important for port state control authorities to exercise a pragmatic and realistic approach to enforce compliance during the initial months of the global switchover, which will come into effect at the stroke of midnight in just 18 months’ time.”
As such, it notes the trade associations have co-sponsored a number of submissions to IMO to help smooth the implementation of the global 0.5% sulphur in fuel cap, in advance of the critical meeting that will be held in London during the second week of July.
These submissions include papers on:
ICS notes of ships trading in ECAs primarily changed to ISO 8217 distillate fuel oils in 2015.
However, in 2020, as well as using distillates to comply with the 0.5% sulphur cap, many ships will have to use blended fuel oils and new products which are outside of the ISO 8217 standard.
On top of the absence of global standards for many of the new blended fuels that oil refiners have promised, there are potentially serious safety issues, including those related to the use of compliant but incompatible bunkers.
“The industry is fully committed to successful implementation of the global sulphur cap on 1 January 2020, and welcomes the significant environmental benefits this will bring, as agreed by IMO Member States and as re-confirmed by the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee in April 2018,” it explains.
“Through their own proposed standard implementation plan, ship owners and ship operators are committed to do what is necessary and what is under their control to meet the standards required.
“But the worldwide implementation of this game-changing new regulatory regime will be far more complex than the previous introduction of sulphur Emission Control Areas for shipping not least because of the sheer magnitude of the switchover and the quantities and different types of fuel involved.”
Published: 19 June, 2018
HFO produces higher levels of air and climate pollutants than any other marine fuel, and its use must be banned in the Arctic, says World Wide Fund For Nature.
Use of DF engines in new ships and scrubbers allow firm to mitigate expected higher cost of low-sulphur fuel.
For the purpose of facilitating smooth and consistent implementation of the global 2020 sulphur cap.
Values close to recent 0.5% sulphur trade levels, potentially signalling a pricing shift ahead of IMO 2020.
Hiap Seng Engineering in Southeast Asia’s biggest tank lift to expand facility with 67,000 cbm of storage.
Update fails to answer number of enforcement policy questions raised by IMO 2020, says Winston & Strawn lawyer.
Buyers can nominate deliveries on platform and plan operations together with suppliers following ‘one single truth’ concept with all players aware of what has been agreed when and by whom, says DNV spokesman.
Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.
Cost of alternative bunker fuels, bunker operations and technology advancement are some considerations to be examined by the maritime industry, says Neo, director of SDE International Pte Ltd.
Kim Hyung Joon and Han Donghoon were planning to join the Singapore entities of Hartree Group - either Hartree Partners Singapore Pte Ltd or Hartree Marine Fuels - in October, discovered management.
‘When you think of Helmsman on the next occasion, think of us as lawyers with expertise in various fields. Come to us before a problem develops. It’s the process that matters,’ says Tang Chong Jun, Executive Director.
Bernard Chew was a former shareholder of MB Marine and was an authorised signatory of the company’s cheques at the material time, according to court documents obtained by Manifold Times.
