Connect with us

Alternative Fuels

IBIA puts spotlight on alternative bunker fuels during IMO’s GHG negotiations

GHG emission reductions must be on a Well-to-Wake basis to be truly sustainable; production of low-GHG fuels should not cause overall lifecycle emissions to increase, says IBIA.

Admin

Published

on

post 56649

The International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA) on Tuesday (4 July) released an article on IBIA sharing perspectives of alternative bunker fuel producers to the IMO during the Intersessional Working Group on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships (ISWG-GHG 15):

IBIA brought the perspectives of alternative fuel producers to the IMO during the Intersessional Working Group on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships (ISWG-GHG 15), the week-long meeting that has set the scene for crucial negotiations to finalise the IMO’s revised GHG Strategy during MEPC 80.

We held a presentation to elaborate on points made in ISWG-GHG 15/3/5 – a paper we developed in cooperation with the Ammonia Energy Association (AEA), the Methanol Institute (MI) and the European Biodiesel Board (EBB).

IBIA’s Director and IMO Representative, Unni Einemo, set the scene with the following key messages:

  • IBIA members are increasingly involved in the supply of alternative fuels, or are preparing to do so
  • IMO’s GHG emission reduction targets must be supported by regulations to guarantee steady growth in the uptake of low and zero emission fuels and technologies, otherwise progress will be too slow
  • The supply side needs a clear demand signal to make the necessary investments in the production and distribution of low and zero emission fuels and technologies
  • GHG emission reductions must be on a Well-to-Wake basis to be truly sustainable; production of low-GHG fuels should not cause overall lifecycle emissions to increase
  • Default Well-to-Tank emission values can form a baseline, but should be sufficiently conservative to encourage producers to demonstrate better performance through relevant certification and verification schemes
  • The IMO’s LCA framework should enable fuel producers to make use of relevant and credible GHG intensity certification schemes

During our presentation, Conor Fürstenberg Stott showed the potential for producing low-carbon ammonia and the work AEA is doing on developing a certification scheme for ammonia to account for the GHG emissions associated with production. Matthías Ólafsson (MI) shared forecasts for the growth in bio-methanol and e-methanol production, highlighting also the growth in newbuilds that are ready to use methanol as fuel. Cailean Macleod (EBB) highlighted facts regarding both the prospects and challenges for using sustainable biofuels in the maritime sector.  To round up the session, Ed Glossop, Head of Sustainable Operations at Bunker Holding Group shared observations on the energy transition as seen from a world-leading marine fuel re-seller.

It was a great example of IBIA bringing industry stakeholders with shared interests together to bring a strong message to the IMO about the policy tools we need to get the transition to sustainable marine energy well and truly underway.

You can read our submission here: ISWG-GHG 15/3/5

You can see the presentation here: CLICK HERE

Related: IMO summary on Intersessional Working Group on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships

 

Photo credit: IBIA
Published: 5 July, 2023

Continue Reading

Methanol

China: CHIMBUSCO Jiangsu completes methanol bunkering operation in Taizhou

Firm successfully delivered 79.5 metric tonnes of methanol bunker fuel to container ship “NCL VESTLAND” using a mobile methanol bunkering skid at Taizhou Sanfu Marine Engineering.

Admin

Published

on

By

China: CHIMBUSCO Jiangsu completes methanol bunkering operation in Taizhou

CHIMBUSCO Jiangsu on Tuesday (3 December) said it successfully refuelled the new methanol dual-fuel powered 1,300TEU container ship NCL VESTLAND at Taizhou Sanfu Marine Engineering.

The total amount of methanol bunker fuel delivered to the boxship was 79.5 metric tonnes.

CHIMBUSCO Jiangsu said the implementation of bunkering operation marked a major breakthrough for the company in the application of alternative fuels for ships, marking its ability to supply methanol marine fuel to ships on a regular basis.

A mobile methanol bunkering skid jointly developed by CHIMBUSCO Jiangsu and COSCO (Lianyungang) Liquid Loading & Unloading Equipment was used for the bunkering operation, which was successfully completed in 2.5 hours. 

In a separate statement, COSCO Shipping said the bunkering operation represented CHIMBUSCO Jiangsu’s first marine methanol fuel supply onshore.

The mobile methanol filling skid operates using the pump as its power source to facilitate simultaneous unloading and refuelling tasks. 

This skid includes several key functional modules, each of which is highly integrated. This integration ensures a safe and efficient process for transferring methanol fuel from tankers to a vessel’s fuel bunker, while also enabling seamless operation and intelligent management. 

The mobile methanol filling skid offers flexibility, requires low initial investment, and boasts a rapid bunkering rate of 180 cubic metres (m3) per hour. 

It stands as an optimal solution for methanol bunkering in the era before widespread adoption of methanol bunkering vessels. Additionally, it can provide bunkering support for shipyards to test new vessels and meet the bunkering requirements of the shipyard,” it added. 

 

Photo credit: CHIMBUSCO Jiangsu
Published: 6 December, 2024

Continue Reading

LNG Bunkering

SEA-LNG: Invest more in LNG bunker vessels, supply and liquefaction infrastructure

LNG bunker market, while growing substantially, is lagging and concerns persist regarding the ability to supply the rapidly growing fleet of LNG-fuelled vessels.

Admin

Published

on

By

SEA-LNG: Invest more in LNG bunker vessels, supply and liquefaction infrastructure

Industry coalition SEA-LNG on Thursday (5 December) said that while the approximately 2,200 LNG-fuelled vessels and LNG carriers represent only ‘two minutes into the hour’ of the global fleet of approximately 60,000 deep sea vessels, it remains an adolescent fuel that is maturing significantly faster than other alternative bunker fuels. 

However, it said the LNG pathway still needs more investment, especially in landside facilities for liquefaction near ports, bio and synthetic methane production and bunkering capacity worldwide.

This year has witnessed unprecedented investment in the maturing and scaling of LNG from ship owners.  LNG is starting to dominate as the preferred future fuel pathway. 

However, the bunker market, while growing substantially, is lagging and concerns persist regarding the ability to supply the rapidly growing fleet of LNG-fuelled vessels.

Peter Keller, Chairman, SEA-LNG, said: “With high profile owners now choosing the LNG pathway, we anticipate this trend will continue and accelerate through 2025 and beyond.”

“As the various alternative fuel pathways mature, there is a growing realisation that, despite previous aspirations, some alternative fuel pathways – like the LNG pathway – are more practical and realistic than others.”

“While investment in newbuild LNG-fuelled ships is robust, we need to see the same for bunker vessels, supply and liquefaction infrastructure. As the LNG pathway continues to mature and the use of liquefied biomethane and eventually e-methane increases, the delivery of the fuel to vessels must be assured and the investment gap closed.”

Keller added: “There are approximately 60,000 deep sea ships on the water and, today, we’re looking at around 600 LNG capable ships afloat with a further 600 on order. There are another 1,000 LNG cargo carriers and bunker vessels of varying sizes.”

“While that’s a small percentage of the global fleet, as the clock ticks towards shipping’s emissions reduction targets, the LNG pathway is maturing far faster than other alternative fuels.”

According to DNV there are currently 54 methanol vessels and 2 ammonia vessels on the water.

There are aspects of LNG usage that are fully mature – safety for one. LNG is easy to transport, poses minimal, if any, risk to marine environments, has a low flammability range and is non-toxic. Effective regulations, standards and guidelines for safe operations are widespread, and LNG has been shipped around the world for almost 60 years without any major incidents at sea or in ports.

Keller continued: “When compared to traditional fuels, LNG is more of a teenager with all the growing pains, challenges and victories associated with adolescence.”

“But it is maturing all the time as the market continues to grow, new build orders continue to rise, and the LNG pathway with biomethane and eventually e-methane produced from renewable hydrogen, gains acceptance globally.”

“Shipping stakeholders are investing in LNG because it provides a low risk, incremental pathway for decarbonisation, starting now.  The other alternative fuels are basically toddlers by comparison.  And when it comes to safety, some are mere newborns!”

Another critical need in the maturing process during a period of increased regulation of carbon emissions is the adoption of standardised chain of custody models on a worldwide basis. 

Chain of custody models are becoming increasingly important to maritime decarbonisation as they provide mechanisms to verify that the fuels used are low carbon. 

Such verification creates investor confidence in new fuel supply chains and accelerates the transition to low-carbon fuels, enabling early adoption in conditions of limited supply. 

“They will create a market for green fuels by connecting buyers to fuel producers away from bunker ports enabling faster scaling and providing flexibility to shipping companies at lower cost,” SEA-LNG added.

 

Photo credit: SEA-LNG
Published: 6 December, 2024

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

GAC: Does Sweden’s alternative fuel development risk worsening a maritime Catch-22?

GAC Sweden’s Nils Igelström says Sweden faces having a surplus of renewable fuel options with limited access to wider European market; collaboration and clarity is needed to prevent stalling in shipping’s energy transition.

Admin

Published

on

By

GAC: Does Sweden’s alternative fuel development risk worsening a maritime Catch-22?

Sweden leads Europe in developing alternative fuels, driven by its 2045 net-zero emissions target and the IMO’s 2050 decarbonisation goal, and it is now making bold advances in renewable fuel options for commercial shipping. 

It is also investing heavily in infrastructure to support the development of biofuels, liquefied biogas and natural gas, and synthetic fuels like eMethanol. Many of these projects, although relatively nascent, showcase the country’s bold vision to lead the alternative fuel development pack.

Groundbreaking

In May 2023, Sweden broke ground on the FlagshipONE facility in Örnsköldsvik, targeting annual production levels of 50,000 tonnes of carbon-neutral eMethanol by combining carbon dioxide and green hydrogen for commercial shipping.

In February 2024, Jämtkraft AB launched NorthStarH2, with the goal of producing up to 100,000 tonnes of eMethanol each year to support Sweden’s green electricity supply and maritime needs.

But the development of alternative fuels goes beyond eMethanol. In August 2024, ScanOcean partnered with Vegoil to introduce a marine fuel derived from hydrotreated vegetable oil produced in Sweden. The tanker vessel Key Fjord successfully took on that product as bunker fuel at the Port of Oskarshamn, marking a step towards making biofuels commercially viable for maritime use.

Such developments highlight Sweden’s leadership in the development of greener fuel options for maritime use. But supply issues could put the brakes on by limiting their market reach.

Bunker fuels supply

The risk of oversupply

Shipping faces a ‘Catch-22’ scenario with alternative fuels: low adoption limits the infrastructure development while companies delay investing in newbuilds or retrofits until fuel supply chains expand. 

This production-market access disconnect risks oversupply in Sweden’s alternative fuel market, restricting access to the wider European maritime sector.

Nils Igelström, Managing Director at GAC Sweden, highlighted the challenge of balancing production and demand for renewable marine fuels: "Sweden is producing some of the most advanced renewable marine fuels, but cargo owners are unwilling to pay higher freight costs. Without buyers, the environmental benefits remain unrealised, stalling progress towards decarbonisation."

Despite interest from shipowners, low demand highlights the need for better market access. 

“Companies like Preem, lead the development of alternative fuels, but oversupply persists,” added Igelström. “With heavily investments in refineries and fuel development, these facilities will continue producing fuels regardless of current demand. However, the priority now is ensuring these fuels reach the market effectively.”

Nils Igelström Managing Director, GAC Sweden

Nils Igelström Managing Director, GAC Sweden

Beyond the Baltic

Supply chain bottlenecks of alternative fuels, including logistical challenges and limited port infrastructure in other parts of Europe, hinder the export of surplus alternative fuels and can lead to higher costs and regulatory complexities. This uneven distribution particularly affects vessels that do not have easy or regular access to the North and Baltic seas. 

“If a vessel calls at Gothenburg regularly, fuel supply isn’t an issue,” said Igelström. “But in areas lacking necessary infrastructure, accessing Sweden’s alternative fuel supplies is challenging. With availability limited to Sweden or Finland or Germany, shipping companies hesitate to invest in greener vessels without certainty of supply.” 

Igelström also emphasised the need to improve accessibility across Europe to encourage investments and support the maritime sector’s green transition. 

The cost factor

Logistical challenges raise costs, with bunkering accounting for up to 50% of a vessel’s daily operating costs. Greener alternatives, according to the World Economic Forum, can cost up to four times more than traditional heavy fuel oil. For an industry with tight margins and volatile freight rates, zero-emission shipping significantly increases the cost of goods. 

A study by Drewry estimated that switching to green methanol would increase fuel costs by 350%, equivalent to an additional US$1,000+ per 40 feet container shipped from Asia to Europe.

“There is a big price gap between renewables and fossil fuels. Exporting Sweden’s alternative fuels further increases costs, but that’s a necessary step to achieve shipping’s green potential,” Igelström said.

Collaboration and clarity

Shipping thrives on clarity, but gaps in regulatory goals, infrastructure, and environmental policies hinder the development of an effective green fuel supply chain.

“Shipping companies need certainty,” Igelström noted. “With tight margins, they can’t risk fuel unavailability, especially where delivery points are scarce. Collaboration across Europe is essential to build a uniform supply chain that ensures renewable-powered ships can operate globally. Policymakers, industry leaders, and international organisations must unite to create conditions for renewable fuels to succeed.”

Sweden is working with partners in Finland, Iceland and the Faroe Islands, leading the charge in devising a supply chain that can support the maritime sector’s access to green fuels. 

In May 2024, the Nordic Maritime Transport and Energy Research Programme launched the STORM project to address supply barriers, assess fuel suitability, and propose solutions to accelerate the green transition. Sweden’s leadership in this initiative highlights its commitment to not only fuel development, but also market accessibility. 

“Sweden is doing its part to drive shipping’s fuel transition through fuel development and regulatory frameworks. However, Europe must collaborate to efficiently distribute surplus renewable fuels across the continent,” Igelström concluded.

 

Photo credit: GAC Sweden
Published: 6 December, 2024

Continue Reading
Advertisement
  • Consort advertisement v2
  • RE 05 Lighthouse GIF
  • Aderco advert 400x330 1
  • EMF banner 400x330 slogan
  • v4Helmsman Gif Banner 01
  • SBF2

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS

  • SEAOIL 3+5 GIF
  • 102Meth Logo GIF copy
  • HL 2022 adv v1
  • Triton Bunkering advertisement v2
  • Singfar advertisement final


  • PSP Marine logo
  • E Marine logo
  • metcore
  • Central Star logo
  • Synergy Asia Bunkering logo MT
  • Mokara Final
  • Auramarine 01
  • CNC Logo Rev Manifold Times
  • Cathay Marine Fuel Oil Trading logo
  • endress
  • Advert Shipping Manifold resized1
  • 400x330 v2 copy
  • VPS 2021 advertisement
  • Headway Manifold

Trending